obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC October 11, 2011, 07:59:44 PM i love SC's just as much as fox birds, minus the 'luxary car' feel.. but this is a prime example of why i love them.. this car is just flat out mean.. makes me reeeaaaaalllllly miss my 89 SC 5spd :(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPFLP3yIzPM&feature=related Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #1 – October 11, 2011, 08:43:44 PM Wow....sounds AWESOME near its top end...guessing 6000+ RPM or so? Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #2 – October 11, 2011, 08:44:52 PM it says 7000rpm.. didn't know sc 3.8's could turn up that high Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #3 – October 11, 2011, 09:54:16 PM I'd love an SC. I'd love anything that's fast at this point... Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #4 – October 11, 2011, 10:17:58 PM always wanted to put an SC motor in a fox, even if it had to be a stang Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #5 – October 12, 2011, 10:02:49 PM I have an 89 SC 5 spd right now, but I can't say I love it. Gimme a fox any day. I know I need to change plugs and wires on it, but its currently running ok at 65K and I really have NO desire to change them. This is coming from the guy that strips cars to their shell to build them! Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #6 – October 12, 2011, 10:30:46 PM no one has the desire to change plugs on an SC.. the driver side plugs are a huge PITMFA.. mine wasn't stock though, i had a few SCP bolt ons with a jet chip, 10% pullies and shorty headers off an SN95 3.8.. she was fun to drive, until the inevitable head gasket failure.. i really miss her, she was a fun daily driveri'll give you an 87 TC with no motor for yours Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #7 – October 12, 2011, 11:36:30 PM you mean pass side plugs? It looks like the drivers is the easy side. Mines got a pulley and cold air intake, full exhaust except manifolds, centerforce dual friction, and ripper shifter. Its quick and all, just gets lousy mileage and doesn't have the looks of a fox. BTW why would I get rid of a running car for a roller? Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #8 – October 12, 2011, 11:53:53 PM Quote from: fordguy545;369996Gimme a fox any day. ^ :p lol i couldn't part with it though.. i get more attached to my cars than i do women.. sad, i know.. lol Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #10 – October 14, 2011, 05:33:41 PM One day I WILL own a 94 or 95 SC. I miss my 96 n/a to death I loved that car and was planning on doing an SC engine swap but the poor car was just dying a slow painful death and I had to put it down. I would love a freakin SC esp in 94/95 cause they got the new interior plus the bigger blower. Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #11 – October 14, 2011, 09:06:21 PM i don't care for the 94+ interiors, too modern for my taste.. but the M90 blower is great. i bought 1 for my SC from a junkyard donor that i never got to put on because of the stupid head gaskets >:l Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #12 – October 14, 2011, 10:09:14 PM I don't know what it is with those cars but I never liked them. I LOVE the Mark VIIIs. I LOVE the foxes, just can't get torqued up about those MN12s. Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #13 – October 14, 2011, 10:54:13 PM neither could i until i traded my cougar for my sc.. i bought it only because of the motor and fell in love with it after it's first trip out of the driveway.. the body just grew on me after that.. i still don't like the non-sc's though, the skirts and bumpers are what do it for me Quote Selected
obviously not a fox, but WOW.. nasty SC Reply #14 – October 14, 2011, 11:02:47 PM Every 89 up mn-12 I have ridden in just felt wrong. Hate the 4.6 too. Even with the extra 75 hp, still can't out run an 86 5.0 cougar. Quote Selected