Skip to main content
Topic: Toyota sucks (Read 4464 times) previous topic - next topic

Toyota sucks

Reply #30
In 98 or 2000 i believe it was mitsubishi was raided by puppieseenese swat for covering up many problems that they had starting in 71. Thats pretty bad 30 some years of horrible products and you have to be raided by the puppies swat to have these files released?

Toyota sucks

Reply #31
Quote from: JeremyB
Rocks don't always need to be exciting. I'd guess a large number of Camry/Accord/Altima owners don't really care about "driving excitement". They want a solid, reliable car with a good resale value. In that respect, the Camry and Accord are a toss-up. Look up the specs between the two, it's like they copied each other.

My mother just bought an '06 Camry. She originally went to get and Accord (because the Civic she had previously did well) but the dealer dropped the ball. She ended up getting the Camry.

I thought about sending her off to test-drive a Fusion, but I didn't want to hear her complain if it ever broke down. Toyota and Honda have quite a reputation for reliability, even if it isn't totally true at this time. Plus, if the Fusion takes after most other Fords, the re-sale value is going to be sub-par compared to the Camry/Accord.


WOW! HONDA HAS A BRUTAL REPUTATION FOR RELIABILTY AS OF LATE, go look it up for yourself on the web there are plenty of recalls out there that dont even make the 6 o clock news yet alone the 11 o clock news...
:birdsmily:

2.5" Cat Back Exhaust, CenterForce Stage 2 Dual Friction Clutch, B&M Ripper Shifter, T3/T4 Turbonetics 63 A/R Turbo, Rods Stainless Tubular Ceramic Coated Header, Boost Controller @ 15Psi, Kirban AFPR, 42lb Injectors, 190LPH Walbro Fuel pump, Ranger Roller Cam, 3" Aluminum Intake Tubing, K&N Cone,  KYB Struts, Koni Red Horizontals/Verticals, Eibach Sportline Springs, Racer Walsh C/C Plates, Polyurethane Bushings, 17x9 Cobra R Wheels

Toyota sucks

Reply #32
Quote from: EricCoolCats
Maybe a little perspective...

Toyotas, Hondas, Nissans, even BMW's are now made in America. The U.S. has opened the doors for its own domestic car competition to come on in, build a plant, build cars, hell, we'll even give them tax incentives to do it. Land of the free? Yes. However, I find it ironic that the U.S. would shoot itself in its own foot just to get businesses to relocate to this country. America is therefore its own competition.

On the other hand...there are a lot of good, hard-working people at those plants. And they have the right, no, the OBLIGATION to drive what they build, at least in brand name. The Chevy Cobalt is built 25 miles from where I live. We are bombarded with ads on TV from car dealers, mostly of GM origin. As a Ford guy, do I complain? No. Those people at the plant keep our sad local economy going. The only way they will continue to do so is to buy what they build. This is a matter of pride, sure, but the economic impact is far reaching, moreso than any other industry I can recall. It doesn't matter if the car is a GM, Ford, Mopar, Nissan, etc.--the net result is the same.

One thing the foreign brands have proven is that the 'old way' of thinking in Detroit will no longer be enough for the Big Three to compete in its own country. It was looooooong overdue, but the typical American consumer ignored that for too long. Now, with new domestic-foreign competition, the American car companies don't look so bright, do they? At the same time the consumers caught onto that, since the level of expectations has risen dramatically in recent years.

A good deal of sales have undoubtedly happened due to the perceived 'quality' issue. I will be the first to admit that American car parts are maybe not the best when viewed globally. But they are inexpensive and usually readily available. A comparable foreign car part, even if made/assembled in America, can arguably be of better quality....but Lord have mercy if you ever need to replace it--it's going to be an expensive bill. Some parts can only be obtained from their source origin countries too---mmmmm, foreign shipping. Lovely. This is the only area where the Big Three can hold its own ground anymore. They will not win the parts war on quality but they will NOT be outdone in price and sheer volume. OK, it's a stalemate that we win by default. Woohoo. But it is at least something to counter the quality Kool-Aid that the foreign automakers expect us to drink without question.

Are foreign (or domestic-foreign) cars made better? Is their quality really that much better? They want you to think that. Truth is, they helped the Big Three close that gap. Again, the bars are constantly being raised, and the level of expectation continues to climb. Well, the American cars are also climbing up the scale, but the media--the unmitigated purveyor of many untruths--never seems to dwell on that. What is sadly obvious is that the Big Three are not innovating so much anymore...they are relegated to playing catch-up in nearly every situation. But they can certainly compete on a quality level. A quick look at the JD Power survey (http://consumercenter.jdpower.com/) will show as much. Even base Fords are above the industry average now. So...that pretty much shoots any argument down from foreign carmakers.

It does boil down to the product. And frankly, there isn't a whole lot to get excited about when looking at what the Big Three are offering. We have some pretty awesome cars available--Corvette, Mustang, 300C, Viper--but they are niche cars, low-volume production, not mainstream as they may have been even 15-20 years ago. In other words, not everyone wants one of those cars. They seem to want something a little more practical. Sometimes the vehicle that gets the job done best, no matter how unattractive the body styling is, will get the sale. How else can the sales of the Camry, Accord, and even the Aztek be explained?! ;) I think what handicaps Detroit cars is that they usually do one thing great, but other things not as well as the competition. The Accord and Camry aspire to do all things well, with nothing really ever standing out. That's their modus operandii. And apparently there are just truckloads of vanilla, plain-Jane lemmings clamoring for such vehicles. And since these cars are relatively reliable, and every year we're reminded of this, and people "hear good things about them" from others...guess who gets the sale. This completely bypasses any offering from Detroit, even if they actually have a worthy or emerging competitor (such as the Fusion, and perhaps even the new Impala SS). In order for the Big Three to ever regain sales like they did 15 years ago, they must break this aforementioned cycle of ownership, and the only way to effectively do that is to offer product that will outdo their competition. So far that's not happening, but they definitely have the means to do so. It is probably just a matter of time.

One thing remains constant: the dealership is the ONLY bridge between the consumer and the car manufacturer, period. How one is treated at the dealer will absolutely make or break the car company. In this respect, the American way of doing business cannot win in its present condition. The Big Three need to get their collective act cleaned up, their commitment to the buyer renewed, and the old way shoved out the door. This is the area where foreign automakers seem to have a great advantage, but it's not like we can't see that. Certainly the Big Three know this. They simply choose not to act upon it, perhaps smug in their current old-school capabilities, that maybe the old way is better, that maybe another heyday of Detroit iron will magically return. While they keep dreaming, American consumers are going with the companies that treat them the best. And they aren't the Big Three.

That being said...I completely agree with the title of this thread. :)


well said..except i would much rather own a ford 500 or fusion over a accord or camry mainly because of how cheap they look
:birdsmily:

2.5" Cat Back Exhaust, CenterForce Stage 2 Dual Friction Clutch, B&M Ripper Shifter, T3/T4 Turbonetics 63 A/R Turbo, Rods Stainless Tubular Ceramic Coated Header, Boost Controller @ 15Psi, Kirban AFPR, 42lb Injectors, 190LPH Walbro Fuel pump, Ranger Roller Cam, 3" Aluminum Intake Tubing, K&N Cone,  KYB Struts, Koni Red Horizontals/Verticals, Eibach Sportline Springs, Racer Walsh C/C Plates, Polyurethane Bushings, 17x9 Cobra R Wheels

Toyota sucks

Reply #33
Quote from: Thunder Chicken
Know why TV's are assembled in puppiesan and Malaysia? 'Cuz RCA can't afford to pay Americans $60k/yr to screw circuitboards into housings when Malaysian workers will do it for $60/day.

RCA assembled in mexico ;) or at least my RCA that i bought at wal-mart was

Toyota sucks

Reply #34
The ford focus is made in mexico and look at how cheap they are compared to other american made vehicles in thier class. Sorry but my next vehicle is a Focus , unless honda makes some more appealing cars. Like maybe bring the crx or prelude back and not totally ulgifiy them.

Toyota sucks

Reply #35
I hate that everybody always prays about how good the puppiesanese cars are and dont see the other side of the coin, Here is a recall for the 2001 camry read it
Summary of the Safety Concern:
      VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE FRONT SUB FRAME ASSEMBLY HAS NOT BEEN ADEQUATELY WELDED. 
Consequence:
      THIS CONDITION COULD CAUSE FAILURE OF THE ASSEMBLY FOLLOWING LONG-TERM USAGE, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Toyota sucks

Reply #36
it all comes down to opinion. I have no clue why the recalls on puppies cars arent as publically broadcasted as the domestic failures. I have noticed that tho.

Toyota sucks

Reply #37
Electronics made in puppiesan? You could probably count the number of electronic devices marketed by puppiesanese companies that are still MADE IN puppiesAN on one hand. puppiesan has as much outsourcing as the US does, because it can always be made cheaper in China.

Anyway, unions are a big part of the reason that everything is being outsourced today. I think unions were a hell of a lot more important in the early 1900's when workers were being royally screwed by big corporations. But today? They seem almost unnecessary in most instances. Now don't get me wrong, my dad was UMWA and today is in the umm...chemical, nuclear, petroleum & textiles? union? something like that. Unions are great when they protect the little guy (such as lawsuit protection etc) but otherwise...not so much.

Speaking of new vehicles? I find there to be very, very little on the market these days that is even remotely exciting. I hate about everything that is FWD and/or ugly so that rules out about 75% of what's out there :P I love the 2005 Mustang, I still like Super Duties although they are obscenely expensive, never had a problem with Rangers. Mazda has one or two cars that seem kinda cool. Can't really say much about any other manufacturers really...nothing really even piques my interest.

Oh, and one last thought-- The day I buy a Chinese car is the day I burn in hell.

Garrett H.
'94 F250 XLT- 4x4, 5 speed, 7.3 IDI Turbo Diesel, 4" intake, 4" exhaust, 5" turnout stacks, manual hubs, etc.
'87 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe
Engine, wheels, tires, etc!
Exhaust sound clip
Another clip

Toyota sucks

Reply #38
Mazda has a few good ones such as the RX-8 Shinka 6 spd 33g's
The Mazda Speed6  28g's  and the new MX-5 i like those new mx-5's they are bad ass little cars but for 27 g's i would rather buy a base focus and do some under the hood work.

 

Toyota sucks

Reply #39
Last year's Mazdaspeed Miata was really cool, but there's no way I could fit in one of those things.

Garrett H.
'94 F250 XLT- 4x4, 5 speed, 7.3 IDI Turbo Diesel, 4" intake, 4" exhaust, 5" turnout stacks, manual hubs, etc.
'87 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe
Engine, wheels, tires, etc!
Exhaust sound clip
Another clip

Toyota sucks

Reply #40
Indeed i would find it hard for me to probably fit in one me being 6 3 and about 280 pounds

Toyota sucks

Reply #41
We dont see this news in any US news

TOKYO (Reuters) - Toyota Motor Corp. (7203.T), puppiesan's biggest auto maker, said on Tuesday it would recall about 1.27 million cars in puppiesan -- its biggest ever -- including its Corolla and 15 other models due to troubles with their headlight switching systems.

Toyota declined to comment on the cost of the recall.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051018...oyota_recall_dc

Toyota sucks

Reply #42
well thats just what  me off the asians get off with looking so fresh and so clean over here when they really have recalls just like any other Car company. But no who will you see on the 6 oclock and 11 oclock Ford, GM, Chrysler.

Toyota sucks

Reply #43
I kind of think that the american companies have come up in quality and the foreign companies have come down a little in quality.  If you compare a 90 toyota camry to a 90 ford taurus there isn't much competition, but now days I don't see too much diff. 

There was a company in my area that was choked out by it's union and they went bankrupt then opened back up telling there employees that they are now going to make $12.00/hr opposed to the $25.00/hr they were making. I'm guessing they were thinning down the benifits as well.  I can't remember what they did, but it was some type of assembly work.  I need to look that up and see what ended up happening. 

I am not what you would call pro-union but the union does have it's place.  The majority of the time who ever has the power abuses it.  If the company has it's way everybody makes $5.00/hr and no benifits. (Ex. Wal-Mart, who got busted for screwing employees out of lunches and two hours each week) If the union has it's way the employees make $30.00/hr with every benifit possible.  It's finding that middle ground that's important, but hey when your making $30.00/hr with no job because the company you work for is out of business don't bitch when the best job you can find after that pays only $10.00/hr because that's the skill you have.  I hope you saved up some of that $30.00/hr instead of borrowing against every bit of it.

I personally don't have a problem with someone making twice what someone else makes doing the same skill job because they sought that oportunity and capatalized on it.  Good for them.  I don't think that any of us here would turn down $30.00/hr just because it came from union pressure.  But it is important to realize that if that job is no longer available be prepared to work for half what you were making.

Unions are not killing Auto Industry

Reply #44
I apologize for tossing in some 'I am too lazy to research numbers' such as "management makes a gazillion times more".  I am new to this forum.  I am very happy to see that little goes unbuttstuffyzed.

However, that does not deter my desire to make people aware of the fact that a reasonble case can be made for Unions being a great thing.

Pls note that UAW made cars,vans, trucks,suv's include MITSUBISH Eclipse, Galant, Endeavor,  MAZDA Tribute and Bseries Trucks, ISUZU I-series, TOYOTA  Tacomah and Corrola.  These puppiesanese manufacturers recognize the value of North American workers.

Here is what the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics has to say about the difference in Union Vs. Non-Union jobs.
"The latest data from the BLS show that union workers in the private sector earn significantly more than their non-union counterparts.  As the table below shows, the union advantage in wages and salaries was $3.96 per hour in June 2004; that's worth over $8,200 for full-time full-year workers.  The advantage grows to $9.66 per hour ($20,000 per year) when benefits are included in the calculation.

(I am having trouble posting table here please deal with it)
 
UNION Total Wage $20.25 Non-union Total Wage $16.29
Union Total Benefits $11.79  Non Union Benefits $6.09
Paid leave,supplemental Insurance, retirement Savings Union 2.16,1.04,3.36,2.27 Non-Union 1.42, .59, 1.46, .65
Legally required benefits Union $2.85 non-union $1.94.
Other Benefits (Severence pay, supplemental unemployment) Union .10 non-Union .03.

TOTAL COMPENSATION  Union = $32.04
TOTAL COMPENSATION NON-UNION = $22.38

If all the above translates in to approximately (after taxes) about $4,000 per month, how can a person think they are worth less?  Your very life is given to produce labor for another so that the other can earn from you.  I am not at all against the prinl, but, even for only putting on bumpers or driving a hi-low a good and loyal worker deserves to own a lower middle class home, a reasonable automobile, heating and airconditioning, reasonable clothing, and good health care and retirement benefits.  If your business model does not include living wages for me, then, hit the road! 

Stop thinking so little of unskilled labor.  What makes you think that middle management has so much skill?  Cheeze o peats, yeah, they went to college, yeah, they don't get dirty, but it aint that hard and it does not take that much talent.  However, when management collectively gets lazy, scared, content, greedy and loses the sense of mission, then the companies fold.  It is not because the people who put the car together can afford to go to the doctor in a new pair of jeans that the company folds, it is because the leaders do not lead, but rather feed, like bloodsuckers, on a machine that is making them a personal fortune.  If this thread continues, I will find more LIGITIMATE statistics about how much management "earns" compared to what they contribute Vs. the labor force.  (I very much believe in free markets, but I know that management thinks of workers as a cost-center, not as assets)