Skip to main content
Topic: 1967 here i come.... (Read 7793 times) previous topic - next topic

1967 here i come....

Here's the baby i bought Today.....  :locked:  :D  :deal:  :rolleyes:  :flip:

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #1
..

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #2
There is no engine, need brake job .... paid 1300$Can
The frame, Body is straith and interior is VERY clean.
It need inspection...

All electric... Windows, Antenna, driver seats and A/C!!

I'm buying a 460 with tranny for 600$CA to put in it :D

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #3
nice project :)
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
1974 maverick lsx powered turbo car SOLD
1973 maverick Tijuana Taxi Tribute
1957 chevy LSX Turbo project (race car)
Owner of Joe Dirt Fabrication

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #4
 looks cool :D  :bowdown: . I want to get a 67-69 Bird one day to. 460 huh. Shouldn't be to hard to put in there. 68 and 69 Birds had 429 Thunderjets so you should be able to get that 460 in there no problem. A little work and you'll be drivin in style.
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #5
now thats a "THUNDERBIRD"!!!!

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #6
What, no Cougar? :eek:

Maybe you're trying to break your curse. ;) Nice 'bird, though. I allways thought the '67-69 were the only true muscle car T-birds. Good buy, too.

:canada:

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #7
Quote from: oldraven
What, no Cougar? :eek:

Maybe you're trying to break your curse. ;)



thanks...
And yes... i hope the curse will go away....  :D

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #8
curse! not with that bueaty! nice car. have you seen gas prices lately. maybe you want to put a turbo 4 into that thing..

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #9
That Tbird is a little big for a 2.3 turbo! There is a 69 (basically the same with a little different grill trim) in my Tbird club and I have seen one up close. They are about 2-3 feet longer and about 1-2 feet wider than a fox Bird and they weigh around 4,000 lbs. I know that with a 429 and a C6 these Birds would run to 60 in about 9 or so seconds. With a built 460 his car should be much quicker. Oh and just so you know 67 was the last year for Ford FE big blocks in Thunderbirds. They had a 300 hp 390ci standard or a 340 hp 428ci optional. In 68 they switched to the 385 serries 429. From 70-76 the 429 was standard with the 460 optional.
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #10
Yeah I still say inline 6
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

 

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #12
cool car...I like the mid 1960's to mid 70's birds

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #13
Quote from: Funky Cricket
curse! not with that bueaty! nice car. have you seen gas prices lately. maybe you want to put a turbo 4 into that thing..


I did see the gas price... but my car is my drug....  :rolleyes:
I have no choise.... I will pay to get more! :D  :tg:
Too much addictive...  :crazy:


Quote from: thunderjet302
That Tbird is a little big for a 2.3 turbo! There is a 69 (basically the same with a little different grill trim) in my Tbird club and I have seen one up close. They are about 2-3 feet longer and about 1-2 feet wider than a fox Bird and they weigh around 4,000 lbs. I know that with a 429 and a C6 these Birds would run to 60 in about 9 or so seconds. With a built 460 his car should be much quicker. Oh and just so you know 67 was the last year for Ford FE big blocks in Thunderbirds. They had a 300 hp 390ci standard or a 340 hp 428ci optional. In 68 they switched to the 385 serries 429. From 70-76 the 429 was standard with the 460 optional.


It weight (with original 390) 4350lb according to the license.
I knew about the last series of the FE engine. That's why I choose a 460. They made it until 1996? (if im right)


Quote from: Haystack
Yeah I still say inline 6

Yeah right!  :crazy:  :flip:  nice try....  :giggle:  :giggle:
My 1st car was a 1982 "Mustang L" (no X) with an inline six... I swear!, NEVER AGAIN! This engine is strong, but suck at acceleration... Maybe i could use an inline 6 on a lawnmower...  :giggle:

Re: 1967 here i come....

Reply #14
Here's an idea (put the guns down while you read this): How about a nice late model 7.3 Powerstroke turbodiesel? It would probably fit and would probably produce more power than the factory 390 did. In fact it would probably produce more torque than any Ford car ever produced, and you'd probably do better than 35MPG while you're about it. Get one of those Banks power chips and you'd be smoking the tires all the way to the bank :D And if you REALLY wanna stick it to the government, run home heating oil in it instead of diesel. It's illegal because you're not paying road tax on heating oil, but in the days of buck-and-a-half gas, who cares???

If I had a garage I would build something like that - big, bloated, classy, stinky, loud and cheap to run :D
2015 Mustang GT Premium - 5.0, 6-speed, Guard Green - too much awesome for one car

1988 5.0 Thunderbird :birdsmily: SOLD SEPT 11 2010: TC front clip/hood ♣ Body & paint completed Oct 2007 ♣ 3.55 TC rear end and front brakes ♣ TC interior ♣ CHE rear control arms (adjustable lowers) ♣ 2001 Bullitt springs ♣ Energy suspension poly busings ♣ Kenne Brown subframe connectors ♣ CWE engine mounts ♣ Thundercat sequential turn signals ♣ Explorer overhead console (temp/compass display) ♣ 2.25" off-road dual exhaust ♣ T-5 transmission swap completed Jan 2009 ♣