Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: My T-bird is a fatty (Read 4436 times) previous topic - next topic

My T-bird is a fatty

So I finally got my 88 T-bird on a scale today. Where my dad works they have a large scale that they use to measure pallet weights that is big enough to fit a car on. I brought my T-bird over today to see how heavy it is. Mind you my car has every option except a sunroof. With nothing in the trunk but the stock mini spare, jack, and tire iron and 3/4 of a tank of gas (my usual race set up) the car weighs 3598lbs. Add me at 153lbs and the race weight comes out to 3751lbs! My T-bird is a fatty:hick:
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #1 –
Wow , that makes my car a fatty too .
Fox-less at the moment

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #2 –
I'll weigh the Sport next week (Wednesday)and post the results of that in an "as daily driven" state of being.. I can say the Sport has minimal options....Power seat,a/c,no light options......But with all of the changes,it's hard to say what the end results will be...

5 speed
aluminum drive shaft
headers
x-pipe (no cats)
aluminum radiator

BUT,soon,I'll have a power passenger seat,full sound deadener in the whole cabin and the entire trunk except the trunk lid. I'll do a re-weigh after that work.Stay tuned......
'88 Sport--T-5,MGW shifter,Trick Flow R intake,Ed Curtis cam,Trick Flow heads,Scorpion rockers,75mm Accufab t-body,3G,mini starter,Taurus fan,BBK long tube headers,O/R H-Pipe, Flowamaster Super 44's, deep and deeper Cobra R wheels, Mass Air and 24's,8.8 with 3.73's,140 mph speedo,Mach 1 chin spoiler,SN-95 springs,CHE control arms,aluminum drive shaft and a lot more..

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #3 –
Those power seat tracks are friggin' heavy.
I cant decide between dual power or manual (If the luxury outweighs the performance). ;)
~Project ThunderStorm = '84 Charcoal Thunderbird - First Car - Long Time Work in Progress~
~Project (No Name Yet) = 1970 Plymouth GTX/RR "Clone"~

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #4 –
Yeah and you wonder why it's slower than you expected lou ;)
 
1/4 tank, me (140) same trunk contents as you mentioned mine is 3680.
 
The silver car is 3400 even, with NOTHING in the its trunk, same gas and of course same me lol. Thats got no A/C components, no moonroof manual sport seats, T5 not an AOD, couple other small things gutted maybe. Optioned out, these things pack on a lotta mass. Still makes new cars look like real fatties though....
1987 20th Anniversary Cougar, 302 "5.0" GT-40 heads (F3ZE '93 Cobra) and TMoss Ported H.O. intake, H.O. camshaft
2.5" Duals, no cats, Flowmaster 40s, Richmond 3.73s w/ Trac-Lok, maxed out Baumann shift kit, 3000 RPM Dirty Dog non-lock TC
Aside from the Mustang crinkle headers, still looks like it's only 150 HP...
1988 Black XR7 Trick Flow top end, Tremec 3550
1988 Black XR7 Procharger P600B intercooled, Edelbrock Performer non-RPM heads, GT40 intake AOD, 13 PSI @5000 RPM. 93 octane

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #5 –
My turbo car is #4040lbs with me and 1/2 tank of fuel


The Blk cat is #3200 with me and bout 10 gal fuel

 Still has pwr seat and windows  but the seats are aftermarket  fuel cell no sound deadning




SCT Tuned by Me(Greg@SpeedyDyno.com)

E.T. 10.28 @ 136.5 MPH 1/4 mile: List of Mods; 351 EFI, AFR heads,AOD,Rousch 13in frt brakes,11in rear brakes, AirRide Tech air ride system, Sub frame connetors,2400 RPM stall, 3.50,BBK shorties,T62PT Turbos  air to air intercooled, Home built kit.
Car weights 3705lbs without driver:burnout:

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #6 –
I forget what mine weighed exactly, but I think it was in the range of 3300. That's with a subwoofer and two amps in the trunk, subframe connectors, an 8.8" TC rear and a 5-speed. It was a low optioned car (A/C, cruise, tilt, PW/PM/PL, but nothing else)
2015 Mustang GT Premium - 5.0, 6-speed, Guard Green - too much awesome for one car

1988 5.0 Thunderbird :birdsmily: SOLD SEPT 11 2010: TC front clip/hood ♣ Body & paint completed Oct 2007 ♣ 3.55 TC rear end and front brakes ♣ TC interior ♣ CHE rear control arms (adjustable lowers) ♣ 2001 Bullitt springs ♣ Energy suspension poly busings ♣ Kenne Brown subframe connectors ♣ CWE engine mounts ♣ Thundercat sequential turn signals ♣ Explorer overhead console (temp/compass display) ♣ 2.25" off-road dual exhaust ♣ T-5 transmission swap completed Jan 2009 ♣

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #7 –
I brought my 'underbird to the flour mill I pick up from, at work. With a full tank of gas it was 3600lbs, exactly.

Considering I'm getting the two cylinder bolt-on done, I'm going to take a weekend and remove all of the sound deadening material and whatever else I might be able to remove to lose some dead weight.
If worms had daggers, birds wouldn't f**k with 'em

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #8 –
Thinking mine's going to also be around 4000 when I'm done.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
***** Project "EVOLUTION" 1987 Cougar LS  & 1985 Cougar Convertible *****
[/COLOR]
5.0 HO 306 roller block, machined GT-40P heads, Wiseco dished forged pistons, Eagle forged floating I-beam connecting rods, Lunati pushrods, ARP bolts, Scorpion aluminum 1.6 rockers, Comp Cams Magnum 266HR, Explorer intake, 65mm TB, MAF Conversion, 19# injectors, Ford Racing stainless P-headers, 2-1/2" cat-less exhaust w/ Flowtech Afterburner lers , SC AOD with 2800 BDR torque converter, 3.73 T-Lok rear, CHE rear control arms, full 2-1/2" frame w/1" jacking rails & seat supports, Rear disk brakes, Turbine wheels, All original interior w/ floor shift upgrade .......
Pretty much every panel on my 87 is new, rebuilt, or re constructed. :D
Join us on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_137541156293768&ap=1
 

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #9 –
Mine weighed 3760 with me(200Lb), mini spare, 3/4 tank and a small tool bag, this is with dual power seats and all options in place... It should weigh right around 3500Lb without the extras, maybe down to 3450 when low on gas...

BTW I weighed it my self on VMP's scales... To be sure they were correct, I checked the difference with me out of the car, dropped to 3560 exactly...

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #10 –
I bet mine weighs 38 more lbs than yours because of the iron heads and the ECC equipment.

I'm not taking any weight out of the car as it's not a track car and I like all my my comfort stuff. It's still not running too bad as a 93 Mustang Cobra with basically the same engine will run a 14.5 stock on street tires. That car only weighs about 3250ish lbs. Mine still needs a bit more power though;)
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #11 –
Mine was 3835lbs last time I went to the track...I'm 250, it had an iron-headed 351w, T-5, all a/c components(just didn't work), a jumper box in my trunk with spare tire, jack, tire iron and a big ol' box of tools in the back seat.

I'm just hoping my '85 CV coupe is under 4000lb with the 351W in it....according to the title it's 300lbs lighter than the 'Bird.  And it certainly doesn't "feel" like a heavy car.  I'll have to weigh it when my boss takes his Nova to the track.
Project 3G: Grandpa Grocery Getter-'85 Crown Vic LTD 2-door, 351W with heavily ported/polished GT40 heads, heavily ported/polished Typhoon Power Plus upper & lower intake, Comp Cams 265DEH retarded 1*, FAST EZ-EFI, HD T5, 8.8" 3.73 trac lock with extra clutches, 3G alt. swap, '99 CVPI front brakes, '09 CVPI rear disc brakes, '00 CVPI booster&m/c + wilwood adj prop valve.

Parted & Gone-'88 T-bird Sport, 351W swap, ported GT40 heads

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #12 –
Wow....I am surprised to see 5.0 T-Birds/Cougars weigh that much.

Our Gray 83 T-Bird w/460 weighs 3350 lbs w/o driver (w/draglites)

The Maroon 460 TC weighs 3450 w/o driver using stock wheels and an all cast iron BB.
Alan Mackin--Semi Professional Ford der
83 T-Bird 460
83 T-Bird Heritage 5.0
84 T-Bird 5.0
86 T-Bird Turbo Coupe NHRA Stocker & Super Stocker
87 T-Bird Turbo Coupe
88 Bronco II Drag truck 302
95 Mustang GT auto
2004 F-350 CC Dually V-10

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #13 –
It's not the engine it's all the options. Dual power seat tracks and the motors and sensors for the automatic climate control add a bunch of weight....
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

My T-bird is a fatty

Reply #14 –
Optionless FTW

As soon as I get mine back on the road I'm gonna go weigh it. I'm really thinking it won't be very much with NO options inside, AC removed, 5-speed, oh yeah, and a half aluminum V6
--SteveN 👍
[thread=28690]1988 Cougar V6[/thread]
2012 F-150 3.7L