Skip to main content
Topic: Weight Distribution? (Read 2591 times) previous topic - next topic

Weight Distribution?

Anyone know what the weight distribution is on our cars.

Specifically 87-88 Cougars with a 5.0 S.O.

Weight Distribution?

Reply #1
The old magazine articles I read list the '87 turbo coupe at 57/43...I figure the 5.0 cars are probably close to that.

Garrett H.
'94 F250 XLT- 4x4, 5 speed, 7.3 IDI Turbo Diesel, 4" intake, 4" exhaust, 5" turnout stacks, manual hubs, etc.
'87 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe
Engine, wheels, tires, etc!
Exhaust sound clip
Another clip

Weight Distribution?

Reply #2
I doubt that, I dont have exact numbers, but I would guess closer to 70/30
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

Weight Distribution?

Reply #3
Quote
I doubt that, I dont have exact numbers, but I would guess closer to 70/30


So....you're saying the back half of the car isn't nearly as heavy as the front? That all the weight is in the engine? Please, share your insight. :hick:

 

Weight Distribution?

Reply #4
70/30??  dude, it's not a frickin FWD!

Garrett H.
'94 F250 XLT- 4x4, 5 speed, 7.3 IDI Turbo Diesel, 4" intake, 4" exhaust, 5" turnout stacks, manual hubs, etc.
'87 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe
Engine, wheels, tires, etc!
Exhaust sound clip
Another clip

Weight Distribution?

Reply #5
Heck a new F-150 has a 57/43 weight distribution.  I doubt our cars are 70/30:rolleyes:
-- 05 Mustang GT-Whipplecharged !!
--87 5.0 Trick Flow Heads & Intake - Custom Cam - Many other goodies...3100Lbs...Low12's!

Weight Distribution?

Reply #6
I would imagine a Cougar would probably be more balanced than a Thunderbird - their longer roof makes 'em look more butt-heavy, anyway...
2015 Mustang GT Premium - 5.0, 6-speed, Guard Green - too much awesome for one car

1988 5.0 Thunderbird :birdsmily: SOLD SEPT 11 2010: TC front clip/hood ♣ Body & paint completed Oct 2007 ♣ 3.55 TC rear end and front brakes ♣ TC interior ♣ CHE rear control arms (adjustable lowers) ♣ 2001 Bullitt springs ♣ Energy suspension poly busings ♣ Kenne Brown subframe connectors ♣ CWE engine mounts ♣ Thundercat sequential turn signals ♣ Explorer overhead console (temp/compass display) ♣ 2.25" off-road dual exhaust ♣ T-5 transmission swap completed Jan 2009 ♣

Weight Distribution?

Reply #7
90/10 My car is plastic from the front doors back.

Weight Distribution?

Reply #8
Quote from: Haystack
I doubt that, I dont have exact numbers, but I would guess closer to 70/30



Try again.


Now, it's apples to oranges, but my '83 Tbird was 54/46 the last time I 4-corner weighed it. :hick:
Long live the 4-eyes!  - '83 Tbird Turbo - '85 Marquis LTS - '86 LTD Wagon-  '81 Granada GL 2dr

Weight Distribution?

Reply #9
well that is what I thought it was. Lemme check my papers, I had the front and the back weighed once.
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com