Video time again December 13, 2005, 10:51:54 PM Hopefully this time without the argument from the last one. :phttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6605730767077503480Tougher than they look, I'd say. Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #1 – December 14, 2005, 12:41:08 AM I`m pretty amazed with this....at 70 mph i believed that one of those would be an ironball....Does The Engine Disintegrated ? i didn`t see any engine Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #2 – December 14, 2005, 12:47:04 AM Not sure.. I don't recall if those were front engine or rear engine. All I know is that it's a little 3-cylinder turbo-diesel.Given the right situation, (and ONLY in that situation) I wouldn't mind driving something like that for the mileage.. but it would pretty much be if I went back to being a document courier, which isn't likely anytime soon. In that situation, it would hardly ever see the kind of speed they're showing in that video. (although, yes, a head-on impact with another car moving in the opposite direction at lower speeds would simulate the same impact ashiznitting a wall at 70) Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #3 – December 14, 2005, 01:05:07 AM Link dead ended me to a list of popular movies. But reading you guys comments I can tell you're talking about the SmartCar vs. Concrete Barrier video. Pretty ed amazing that the shiznitbox held up so well. Now where's the crash test where a fuel tanker goes ass-over-teakettle on top of the little rollerskate. Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #4 – December 14, 2005, 01:08:22 AM NSFW Warning on this one:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5492994624829138077You can't tell me this kid won't regret this forever. Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #5 – December 14, 2005, 01:13:13 AM I think it held together very well considering how hard the impact. Both doors functioned (Passenger's like nothing heppened).The shell barely bent on the drivers side I noticed.How did they get it to drive w/o a catapult or track ? Remote control I guess but it looked like seemless integration unlike the one Mythbusters used on the Crown Vic. Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #6 – December 14, 2005, 01:22:12 AM that's pretty good. I didn't think one of them would hold up that good. I still don't think I'de drive on though......What the hell's up with the cat video:shakehead Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #7 – December 14, 2005, 01:26:24 AM The car held up better than even I would've thought, and I don't really subscribe to that big-car bias that a lot of people have.As for the cat video.. I think that guy was trying too hard to be as dorky as the Star Wars Kid.. came close to succeeding, but not in a manner that would be as memorable as Internet oddities go. That was a "hey, look how odd I can pretend to be on camera" thing. Yawn. Wouldn't even merit posting on Consumption Junction. :p Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #8 – December 14, 2005, 01:29:44 AM Cant say anything that hasent been said about that smart other than the amazing fact that it was still in existance.And what the hell were you searching to find the guy dry humping the cat??? Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #9 – December 14, 2005, 01:31:33 AM I don't necessarly have a big car bias I'm just worried that with all the nut balls in Suburbans adn Expeditions that I might not be too well off in an accident. With the size of some of the vehicles we have here the Smart Car might not fare too well in an accident. Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #10 – December 14, 2005, 01:32:09 AM No shiznit, Brian.. wuzzupwiddat? :p Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #11 – December 14, 2005, 01:37:59 AM Quote from: thunderjet302I don't necessarly have a big car bias I'm just worried that with all the nut balls in Suburbans adn Expeditions that I might not be too well off in an accident. With the size of some of the vehicles we have here the Smart Car might not fare too well in an accident.I wouldn't have a problem driving that around town all day at 35-45 mph.. big SUVs (or as I call them now, "foofoo trucks") :p and all. 70 mph into a concrete wall and that's how it comes out? .. and it even moved the wall. Much more serious of an accident than that, and I think any car I'd be in would kill me anyway.. SMART car or otherwise. I have no illusions that driving my LSC into a brick wall at 70+, for example, wouldn't have me wearing a 5.0 HO as a belt buckle. I wouldn't even want to see how my truck would hold up to that. Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #12 – December 14, 2005, 01:42:11 AM I do have one problem with those cars tho what the hell is a 6''3' guy such as myself susposted to do for room in one of those and furthermore what kinda injuries am i going to sustain because this thing was built to break around me? Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #13 – December 14, 2005, 01:48:04 AM Sometimes it's better if the car breaks around you and you don't break. The height thing I couldn't tell ya. Mabey they need a tall roof version or something:D . Oh that 5.0 HO would be one hell of a heavy belt buckle;) . Quote Selected
Video time again Reply #14 – December 14, 2005, 01:50:28 AM Appropriately enough, the cat came up under "random" videos. Quote Selected
Topic: Video time again (Read 2107 times)
previous topic - next topic
