Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: rear end (Read 3259 times) previous topic - next topic

rear end

what size rear end does an 89 cougar have

Re: rear end

Reply #1 –
one that will not work in a fox body cougar.
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

Re: rear end

Reply #2 –
Guess your makin your rounds with questions again.  89's have independent rears Not worth the hassle....
-- 05 Mustang GT-Whipplecharged !!
--87 5.0 Trick Flow Heads & Intake - Custom Cam - Many other goodies...3100Lbs...Low12's!

Re: rear end

Reply #3 –
you all make me ****in laught

Re: rear end

Reply #4 –
it, I can't vote lower than one star.. :disappoin
 

Re: rear end

Reply #5 –
Quote from: Bird351
it, I can't vote lower than one star.. :disappoin


But you did give it a good mad face.
I give it  :mad:  :mad:

Re: rear end

Reply #6 –
The never-before-seen :mad: in a Z formation..? :wtf:


I guess that would be something like:

:mad:-:mad:-:mad:
-----:mad:--
----:mad:---
---:mad:----
--:mad:-----
:mad:-:mad:-:mad:

Re: rear end

Reply #7 –
Quote from: im gay as hell
you all make me ****in laught

truth must be funny, because an 89 rear wont work
It's Gumby's fault.

Re: rear end

Reply #8 –
d00d if he wunts to mawd his kar wit an 89 reer he will do it, u r idiots 89 is simuler to a fawks bodee becuz it has teh sayme rufe-lyne and ther-4 the reer end wil bolt rite in LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!teeeheehehehehezers lol

Re: rear end

Reply #9 –
PS - so I'm not a total idiot, I believe the rear end housing is probably a 7.5" unless maybe it's a supercharged model (no you can't use the blower on your car, never) then it may be an 8.8"  Either way it's not compatible with your car.

Re: rear end

Reply #10 –
yeah, they're 7.5 unless it's a SC, at least, the wife's 89 is a 7.5...
'98 Explorer 5.0
'20 Malibu (I know, Chevy, but, 35MPG. Let's go brandon, eh)

Re: rear end

Reply #11 –
I'm pretty sure 91+ V8 MN12 models all had the 8.8 pumpkin, some with traction-lock, some without. In Mark VIII's, it was aluminum.
2015 Mustang GT Premium - 5.0, 6-speed, Guard Green - too much awesome for one car

1988 5.0 Thunderbird :birdsmily: SOLD SEPT 11 2010: TC front clip/hood ♣ Body & paint completed Oct 2007 ♣ 3.55 TC rear end and front brakes ♣ TC interior ♣ CHE rear control arms (adjustable lowers) ♣ 2001 Bullitt springs ♣ Energy suspension poly busings ♣ Kenne Brown subframe connectors ♣ CWE engine mounts ♣ Thundercat sequential turn signals ♣ Explorer overhead console (temp/compass display) ♣ 2.25" off-road dual exhaust ♣ T-5 transmission swap completed Jan 2009 ♣

Re: rear end

Reply #12 –
hhahaha ...you guys keep sayin rear end ...


.....sorry

Re: rear end

Reply #13 –
yeah I thought that this was over after my post.
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

Re: rear end

Reply #14 –
You guys are forgetting 2 things:

First, you can do anything you can put your mind to... thats what my teachers told me.

Second, with a little jb weld and some ler tape you could fab up some badass brackets to fit in that rearend!