Skip to main content
Topic: Lincoln MC and Mustang Booster who is running? (Read 4411 times) previous topic - next topic

Lincoln MC and Mustang Booster who is running?

Reply #15
Xxx
I spend money I don't have, To build  cars I don't need, To impress people I don't know

HAVE YOU DRIVEN A FORD LATELY!!

Lincoln MC and Mustang Booster who is running?

Reply #16
I'm disagreeing with you on this on Tom.  I measured the brake pedal on my 93 Fox Coupe and calculated a 3.4:1 ratio.  This is also the same ratio that Jack Hidley (Maximum Motorsports) has posted on several sites when discussing brakes on these cars as well as how to modify the pedal for manual brakes.

If your calculations on the TC pedal are correct then just about any combination on a Fox Mustang that has power brakes should have the same results on a Thunderbird with a Fox Mustang pedal assembly.  I used a Fox Mustang pedal assembly on my 83 T-Bird with zero issues.

Darren

83 351W TKO'd T-Bird on the bottle


93 331 Mustang Coupe - 368 rwhp

Lincoln MC and Mustang Booster who is running?

Reply #17
my fox mustang brake/clutch pedal was identical to my 87 bird one when I did the t-5swap. I saw no difference in mounting or length
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

Lincoln MC and Mustang Booster who is running?

Reply #18
Xxx
I spend money I don't have, To build  cars I don't need, To impress people I don't know

HAVE YOU DRIVEN A FORD LATELY!!

Lincoln MC and Mustang Booster who is running?

Reply #19
I just measured my stock aod pedal assembly, it was about 14" over all, 10" from nub to center of brake pedal. interestingly, this would give me about a 2.5/1 ratio, which doesn't make any sense to me.
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

 

Lincoln MC and Mustang Booster who is running?

Reply #20
Haystack,

No, that gives you a 3.5:1 ratio.  You need to measure from the center line of the pivot point of the break pedal to the center of the break pedal pad (X).  Then you need to measure from the center line of the pivot point to the center line of the brake rod attachment point on the break pedal (Y).  Divide X/Y = Brake Pedal Ratio.  In your case you are saying that X=14" and to find Y you need to subtract 10" from 14" to get 4".  This gives you 14/4 = 3.5.

Darren

83 351W TKO'd T-Bird on the bottle


93 331 Mustang Coupe - 368 rwhp

Lincoln MC and Mustang Booster who is running?

Reply #21
Tom,

From your pictures both brake pedal lengths are 13".  On the left you have a 9-1/2" measurement from the center of the break pedal pad to the center of the brake rod attachment point and a 3-1/2" measurement from the center of the brake rod attachment to the center line of the pivot point of the break pedal arm.  This is an overall length of 13" on the one the left.  The one on the right is 9" & 4" which is an overall length of 13".  The one on the left has a ratio of 3.7 and the one on the right has a ratio of 3.25.  This is all based on the picture you provided which I am doing quite a bit of assuming on the measurements as the pictures are not quite straight on and I cannot see where the end of the tape is on the break pedal arm pivot point.  I was pretty sure you would have taken that measurement from the center line but I cannot tell.  Also, if you would post the Ford part number stamped in the arm it would help as well.

Darren

83 351W TKO'd T-Bird on the bottle


93 331 Mustang Coupe - 368 rwhp

Lincoln MC and Mustang Booster who is running?

Reply #22
Well GOOD MORNING guys, I didn't follow this over the weekend but appears there was some back and forth. I only see one side of it now but I appreciate the replies. From what I follow from Aero's posts there was some debate over pedal effort. Parts should be in this week, but I"m pulling the motor to weld up the engine bay but will post results soon as its back on the road.
88 Turbocoupe: Coast High Performance 331 kit 28oz balance, Comp XE264HR14 cam, 58cc 185 afr heads, 1.7 roller rockers, Mass-Flo EFI (was POS to setup and their techline is a joke at best)
Full 1 5/8 primary equal length headers, 2 1/2 exhaust, Full manual reverse VB c4 and baked off clear coat "BECAUSE RACECAR"