Rear Coilover conversion
Well after a very long cold winter in the great white north, my Windsor stroker is built and on the way! Right on I can hardly wait but the whole build of my car will not be done until next spring...
What I am wanting to get done this summer is a tough rear end and room for big enough slicks to get some serious power down at the track. I took my car down to a shop today and talked to the owner about getting the work done. I am undecided on which route to go. It will cost serious money either way but I am thinking of going with a fab 9 rear with an 8.5 legal cage and have the car back halved. If I go that route I will be able to fit 14x32x 15 slicks with a four link setup. It is not cheap the shop says that they can do it for under 15k. I was expecting this but not sure that I need to do this. I am still thinking of building a fox stang 8.8 and run a coilover conversion using the che control arms. The engine was dynoed at 491hp and 500 ft lbs with 8.5 to 1 compression ratio and running a carb. I am planning on using a fast xfi setup with the fully ported eddie jr manifold and Wilson elbow with an accufab 90mm tb. The engine is built to run at 14lbs of boost so with the Turbonetics T-76 I have I am thinking 800hp @ 10 to 12 lbs will be a conservative number. I am going to run a G Force G101a qith a long v gate shifter and I am thinking of about a 3.55 rear gear ratio. What I am wondering is should I go with a fox 8.8 built with 35 spline axles ect and maybe a mini tub and stuff in the biggest slick I can fit? I know that there are a lot of guys running very quick with a 28x10.5 slick but I have never run a car at this power level before and I want to make sure traction will not be an issue. I do know that fast has an option of traction control wonder if that might be a way to go? I already have a lot sunk into the engine, turbo and related parts and my cash is limited so if I can save some on the back half of the car it would be nice as long as I can get traction...
Any ideas and or suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark