a VERY DIFFERENT approach to porting Reply #30 – March 30, 2012, 11:41:06 PM On an engine where getting air in and out quickly increases performance, I think you have to be an idiot to think restricting air will help and engine. Quote Selected
a VERY DIFFERENT approach to porting Reply #31 – March 31, 2012, 04:07:26 AM its not a matter of restricting, its a matter of optimization. We all know bigger is not always better. If it was we would all have 6" dual smoke stacks on our cars. Its tuning (no not like imports like to use the word) but "fine tuning" engine components. HP2G has proved to the world that improving the efficiency of EVERY part of the engine not only improves mileage dramatically but it also does wonderful things for power. Its just a shame they dont want to share their research with the rest of us. Quote Selected
a VERY DIFFERENT approach to porting Reply #32 – April 02, 2012, 08:36:09 PM Quote from: atroxr7;385665If it was we would all have 6" dual smoke stacks on our cars. bite your tongue! i would rather run stock exhaust.. stacks are ridiculous and stupid, i wish they were illegal.. especially with the morons with cummins diesels put a 10" stack in the center of the bed :barf: Quote Selected
Topic: a VERY DIFFERENT approach to porting (Read 5176 times)
previous topic - next topic
