Skip to main content
Topic: silly people (Read 2261 times) previous topic - next topic

silly people

Reply #15
The reason I was given years ago for the Birds not getting the H.O. was clearence problems under the hood. But with all the Gt40 intakes on these cars now we know that wasn't really an issue.

silly people

Reply #16
Quote from: 1Bad88tbird;346901
The reason I was given years ago for the Birds not getting the H.O. was clearence problems under the hood. But with all the Gt40 intakes on these cars now we know that wasn't really an issue.

 
That's the silliest thing I have ever heard ..the HO is dimensionally identical to the  SO... someone fibbed to you years ago ..lol
Fox-less at the moment


silly people

Reply #18
Quote from: dragon574444;346848
Why didn't these cars get the H.O. anyway? The Mark VIIs got 'em.

Because Ford could not have Cougars + Birds leaving the factory as fast or faster than their darling Mustangs.  They even went to the trouble of designing the fake, more restrictive dual exhaust system that only went on the Cat/Bird platform, even though the Mustang system would have bolted up with a manifold change.  What should have been.........................

silly people

Reply #19
lmao.. a simple cam change would have de-tuned the HO enough to keep the birds/cats slower.. morons

silly people

Reply #20
Quote from: hwy73;346965
Because Ford could not have Cougars + Birds leaving the factory as fast or faster than their darling Mustangs.  They even went to the trouble of designing the fake, more restrictive dual exhaust system that only went on the Cat/Bird platform, even though the Mustang system would have bolted up with a manifold change.  What should have been.........................
Partly true but  85 Mustangs had the same "dual" exhaust set up as 88cat/ birds
Fox-less at the moment

silly people

Reply #21
a simple cam and throttle body change could really de-tune the motor enough that it couldn't touch the stang.. but why restrict the power? it was their last muscle car for crying out loud

 

silly people

Reply #22
Quote from: turbo_88_XR7;346973
a simple cam and throttle body change could really de-tune the motor enough that it couldn't touch the stang.. but why restrict the power? it was their last muscle car for crying out loud

So would the extra weight of a cat/bird
Fox-less at the moment


silly people

Reply #24
Yeah, I would think the extra weight of the car, along with all the options that our cars have would be enough. Oh well...
2002 Honda Civic EX

1984 Ford Thunderbird Elan
5.0 CFI, T5, Dual Exhaust

silly people

Reply #25
I'm not surprised, I saw a 1990 Super Coupe being advertised as turbocharged at our local Ford dealer.

IMO the Thunderbird didn't get the HO simply because Ford didn't want any potential infighting with its precious Mustang.
Matt
1984 Thunderbird - 89 302 HO, GT40 heads w/ Trick Flow springs, E303 cam, Edelbrock Performer 289 intake and 600 cfm 4bbl, Mustang headers, Jegs o/r H pipe, Dynomax lers, Mustang AOD and shifter, Mustang 8.8 w/ 3.73s, 3G alternator, Mustang front and rear sway bars, KYB SN-95 front struts and shocks, and 11" front brakes.

1988 Mustang GT - GT40 heads, Explorer intake, 70mm throttle body, 70mm MAF, Crane 1.7 rrs, E303 cam, Kirban Kwik shifter w/ Pro 5.0 deluxe handle, aluminum clutch quadrant and firewall adjuster, o/r h pipe, Dynomax lers, 3G alternator, aluminum radiator, and 3.27 gears.
 
1986 Cougar 5.0, 1989 Mark VII LSC 5 speed, 1980 Mercury Zephyr 4 door (sold)

silly people

Reply #26
I think most people that aren't otherwise familiar with the cars could fairly (though incorrectly) assume ford would use the same engine in these cars. Why have a suck version and throw it in a "flagship" car? I think until one actually becomes familiar with or owns one they wouldn't generally know otherwise. Similar to those that say the mark viii has "the same engine as a cobra"

Anyway, IMHO i think they never were equipped with the HO because it would have hurt the turbo coupe and in some part the mustang.
:america: 1988 Thunderbird Sport, Former 4.6 DOHC T56 conversion project.

Rest of the country, Welcome to Massachusettes. Enjoy your stay.

 
Halfbreed... Mango Orange Y2K Mustang GT
FRPP complete 2000 Cobra engine swap, T56 n' junk...
~John~

silly people

Reply #27
i wish the mark 8 had the cobra motor hiding under the hood.. lol

silly people

Reply #28
Quote from: turbo_88_XR7;346973
a simple cam and throttle body change could really de-tune the motor enough that it couldn't touch the stang.. but why restrict the power? it was their last muscle car for crying out loud

That really is basically what they did. The 86 stang had the same throttle body and heads as the 86-88 S.O. This is my theory on what happened. The 87 up body style was supposed to come out in 86. They decided not to put it through, for what ever reason and left it till 87. The 87 body style had under the car setup to run duels. I know of several sports and XR7's that had the dual hump crossmember in 87 as well. I honestly think that the sport and XR7 were going to get the H.O. and then last minute they decided not to. In 87, the ford truck started using e7's, as well as the mustang. Only the panthers, and cat/bird kept using the e6's and the exhaust manifolds.

My idea is, they decided to push the car forward as it was planned in 86, before the SEFI H.O. was really setup or standardized.
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com