opinion on lowered vs stock stance Reply #30 – April 15, 2010, 07:27:54 AM Quote from: 50tbrd88;318298That's not lowered, that's f'n SLAMMED. lol. Looks bad ass and handles great too I bet.Slammed?!? Hell, I thought maybe he forgot to reinstall the springs! :eek:Looks great though!Shiny Side Up!Bill Quote Selected
opinion on lowered vs stock stance Reply #31 – April 15, 2010, 10:30:24 AM Quote from: gumby;318315uh....firm...yeah, thats it my spring rates are far from what most would consider for a street car, but coupled with high quality dampers the ride is very tolerable IMO.Well, the IRS on the rear helps with ride quality, as do the coil-overs on the front.Mine is currently lowered with FMS C-Kit springs on the front (with maybe a 1/8" spacer on top of the upper isolator) and SN-95 convert springs in the back with the rearward mounting point of the RLCA dropped 3/4". Quote Selected
opinion on lowered vs stock stance Reply #32 – April 15, 2010, 03:11:12 PM So what springs do you have? If there turbo coupe there about right. Everything on your car shows TC. Quote Selected
opinion on lowered vs stock stance Reply #33 – April 15, 2010, 04:43:59 PM Quote from: Chuck W;318376Well, the IRS on the rear helps with ride quality, as do the coil-overs on the front.well, yeah, theres that too :hick:i really need to get bustin on mine, and get it back together.... Quote Selected
opinion on lowered vs stock stance Reply #34 – April 16, 2010, 12:51:55 AM Quote from: Chuck W;318376Well, the IRS on the rear helps with ride quality, as do the coil-overs on the front.Mine is currently lowered with FMS C-Kit springs on the front (with maybe a 1/8" spacer on top of the upper isolator) and SN-95 convert springs in the back with the rearward mounting point of the RLCA dropped 3/4".Chuck can I have your C spring set? Please:DYour car is awesome. Quote Selected
Topic: opinion on lowered vs stock stance (Read 3810 times)
previous topic - next topic
