Skip to main content
Topic: Oh My... (Read 5853 times) previous topic - next topic

Oh My...

Reply #30
Quote from: HAVI;285786
  It was said that I don't take it seriously, I tried to prove otherwise, that's all.


I am sorry, I regret saying that and my mistake all the way around.

Oh My...

Reply #31
No need to be sorry, I understand completely where you were coming from.

If everything was going well in today's economy, we all would be discussing all the things we've been doing with our cars, car shows, new projects, etc....  Instead the majority is wound up and disgusted, and politics and people become the scapegoat, and it brings out the worst in many.  And that's not just this site, I've seen it on several other forums as well.  It's like a nationwide cabin-fever.....not healthy.
1987 TC

Oh My...

Reply #32
on topic,

Beck's speaker (and much smarter than I with law) said its perfectly legale to include these statement.

however, in stewardship of being a good and fair resource for people to try and partite in some form of madness to stimulate car sales, the govt knew what they were doing by adding this and its wrong. 

Seek
I to try to educate myself by asking why people on opposite sides of the spectrum think like they do.  My debates generally come equpped with substance , resources and fact as i think its the right thing to do so spouting off at the mouth doesnt happen.  The other person 9/10 times will be equipped with nothing more than techniques of speech that flip the topic and totally avoids the answeres. 

I swear, i have honestly asked people "XYZ" and it ends up being a generic answer or nothing answer/statement.  I actually heard someone on Hanity say he liked how our leader is doing and i told the wife,, "honey, now thats another person i would love to talk with, try and learn what it is i am not seeing".

This cars program is charity,,, wait until tax time when you have to report your rebate ........see if its added back into your gross income or not.

Yes, Beck is strung up high but again, simply saying he is offensive is not the topic nor does it have anything to do with the topic, but more to do with if he is right or wrong  and on the topic he speaks.

many people cant get past personality, i think thats where prior military people make out the most, we were blended with all walks of life and had to focus on the mission at hand.  Being offensive had very little to do with the progress of the mission.  There are a lot of people who are offensive but stating wild ideas of taking back your country , marching on DC, speaking out at town halls is only a small part being a american.  Doing the right thing and staing on topic is critical in times like these.

CNN is a little softer than Fox and recently after what they did to Lou Dobbs (cnn) , i got a little frustrated that he was told to shut his topic down, that I decided that station might be partiting in dis-infomation techniques. 

Atleast when you stare at someone on like O'Riley, he brings on board generally a dem, rep and middle to talk about a topic.  Yes even on fox, there is a guy who demands he has people from all likes to debate or work through a topic.

This topic is worth looking into more closely and also worth looking into and  comparing what other areas are being exploited like it. 

It wont be long before we all are forced accept the "mark" so to speak,, as in ,, we have no choice other than to sign or click here to accept this or that. 

I will stand up and rebel,, and become one of those so called paid or implanted town hall speakers about topics like this.

Oh My...

Reply #33
How is Glenn Beck a bigot?  I've never heard any bigotry out of his mouth.  He was one of the only talk show hosts bashing Bush and the repubs when they were spending like drunken sailors acting like 90's democrats.

Anyway, how can you be offended at the fist post since it brought out a warning that everyone should heed?  Who cares who points it out.

Oh My...

Reply #34
I read this rant today which perfectly to a "T" describes why I will never debate people who get their news from corporate media ws:

Quote
The point is simple: there is the truth, and there are lies. There is information, and there is deliberate misinformation. There are facts, and there are distortions of reality.

And if you don’t know the difference between them, that’s a shame. But that doesn’t mean that the sane, intelligent, fact-seekers among us are responsible for your idiocy – its existence, its perpetration, its promotion, or its consequences.

If you are reading this on a computer, you have access to the truth. Use it. If you’re a computer dummy who doesn’t know how to search out real information, ask someone to assist you. It’s that simple – so stop being simple-minded and get with the program.

If you honestly believe that someone like Rush Limbaugh is a straight-shooter who wouldn’t lie to you, do some research into his background. Then ask yourself if a drug-addled bigot who makes his living riling up hate and discord might not have a financial agenda in roping-in gullible people like you and keeping them as part of his “audience share” – the numbers upon which his income is based.

The same goes for Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, and the rest of their ilk. These people aren’t stupid – they make their living by spewing complete and utter bullshiznit, knowing that people like you ARE too stupid to question it, no matter how incredibly ridiculous it is.

If you truly believe that Obama’s healthcare reform program includes talking your grandmother into being euthanized – or any of the other  you’ve been hearing – you are an idiot, plain and simple. The facts about what is being proposed are out there, readily available. If you can’t be bothered to avail yourself of those facts, then shut up and allow those who can be bothered to inform themselves do the talking. We already have more than enough morons speaking out from a position of complete ignorance – you needn’t add to their numbers.

If you sincerely accept that someone like Orly Taitz, who can’t put a sentence together without making a public fool of herself, knows what she’s talking about, you are as much of a fool as she is – maybe more so.

If you believe that Sarah Palin’s ramblings – along with her hypocrisy, her questionable ethics, her complete inability to speak coherently or advisedly on every subject from how government operates to foreign affairs – qualify her as a leader of this nation or any other, you are just plain delusional.

The greatest threat to this country right now is the stupidity of people like you. In today’s technological world, there is no excuse for not being well-informed by reliable sources – not the gibberish you swallow from alleged “news organizations” that fill your head with nonsense because you are too lazy, or just too dumb, to allow a fact into your brainless head.

We all have our opinion as to whether the interests of our nation are best served by Democrats or Republicans, progressives or conservatives, far-leftists, far-rightists, centrists – or any combination of the above.

But on the topic of who can contribute the most to the serving the best interests of all citizens, there is one truth that is, on its face, self-evident: those of you who live in self-imposed ignorance, or hold onto your stupidity as though it was something to be proud of, are completely, unequivocally, and undeniably useless.

Abject Stupidity – we may never wipe it out in our lifetime. But if people like YOU can’t be bothered to get a brain, you can at least understand why the rest of us can’t be bothered to listen to a pointless word you say.

Are we elitists? You betcha! (Couldn’t resist translating that last comment into Palinese in an attempt to be understood by the intellectually impaired). We who seek out the real information behind proposed legislation and what it means are - you'll forgive me or not - bored to tears by those of you who can't conjure up the necessary energy to know what it is you're talking about BEFORE opening your big, fat mouths.

Debate the informed among us on the facts of an issue, and we’re all ears. We may not agree with you, but we are willing to engage in honest discussion.

But if all you are capable of is parroting the talking points spewed BY the ignorant FOR the ignorant, you will find that we who can actually THINK have better things to do than listen.

Got that? Good. It’s about time you finally got something.

It's a start.
11.96 @ 118 MPH old 306 KB; 428W coming soon.

Oh My...

Reply #35
Quote from: Cougar5.0;285865
I read this rant today which perfectly to a "T" describes why I will never debate people who get their news from corporate media      s:


Uuuuuhhhhhhhh......... yeah..... I'm done here.

Oh My...

Reply #36
actually cougar5.0,

what you posted reminds me of someone giving a good old fashioned butt chewing. 

sometimes people need woke up in various ways and to tell someone they are not informed, and are stupid for opening thier mouths on topics they dont know about is founded.  Heck, ive been told im an idiot here in the past and yes i have been guilty of speaking on topics i should not have.

Ive been told the same thng myself in the past ,, guess what?  I had to either STFU, or if i was interested in being involved then i needed to bring some founded substance to the discussion.

I have noticed something ,a word you have used a lot in the past which is "hypocrisy".  The wife also keeps an eye out for any and all hypocrisy and once found, any and all information from that source suddently becomes BS.  I cant get my head around it personally.  We all at points in our life have to be hppocritical even when raiising our children.  "do as i say,not as I do" ect ect.


Just the idea of my saying that the terms and conditons of the cars website is wrong, in another thread i say its perfectly legal and believe it is so. 
but.....read on........

during the times in which people wanted huge loans on houses they could not afford, the poor consumer out there was tricked because all the fine print was just too hard for us poor little stupid people to read.  The truth is, if you wanted the loan, you had to agree to all that fine print no matter what even if it said that lack of payments would result in us putting you into a jail cell somewhere.

I dono people,  it is what it is.  My apparent paranoia sometimes pays off.  I hope I am doing the right thing, doing the best thing possible and still trying to be a good father, friend and neighbor to people around me.  I hate chaos and more hate the source of it all and stuff like this only makes me worry that we will be looking for a way out when today we could have made more progress than 10years from now.

For the record Cougar5.0,
You have not said you agree or disagree to this cars terms and conditions,  only that you pointed out the source was not reliable.  No finger pointing here, i just wanted to point out that if you have an opinion on the topic, then share it or atleast stay on topic.  The distractions do nothing but extend the amount of time the solution is found.

I disagree with the terms and conditions of the cars program as it is real and is public information to be viewed and accepted by anyone out there. 
I just have one more thing to ask of anyone out there because this isnt the first time ive been told that getting my information from the media is wrong.................

Where should I get my information from?

Oh My...

Reply #37
The CARS program is shiznit, and it's going to come around and bite everyone in the ass.

(Don't mistake this for me being anywhere close to conservative in my political leanings...very far from it.  A bad idea is a bad idea, no matter where it comes from)
Long live the 4-eyes!  - '83 Tbird Turbo - '85 Marquis LTS - '86 LTD Wagon-  '81 Granada GL 2dr

Oh My...

Reply #38
This thread has already gotten far more political than we generally allow on this forum, but what the hell, I'll throw some gas on the fire before it gets really ugly and inevitably closed. Time to push this thing off a cliff:

I would be really surprised if the disclaimer on the CARS site wasn't a product of the Dept of Homeland Security, and is likely buried somewhere on every gov website. You know, that same Dept of Homeland Security, the one trampling all over civil rights and liberties of US citizens daily, that is a Bush legacy. I don't know what's more deplorable: The Republicans' very active and very blatant (and very sadly, apparently successful) attempts at dividing the country, or the fact that many people are falling for the propaganda, and in turn spreading it themselves with no regard whatsoever as to its truthfulness (the ignorant, factless statements being made all over the place about C4C, such as what happens to the car when it's turned in, and people claiming you have to pay taxes on the grants are but two examples out of about eleventy billion). It's almost like the Republicans are gunning for civil war and are using any stupid old thing they can come up with to try to start it, including something that is likely very much a product of their own policies (the cars.gov disclaimer), and other things that are definitely  products of their own policies (the shiznitty economy, the auto bailout, which was a legacy of Bush, the even bigger banking bailout, which was another legacy of Bush, etc), not to mention things with no basis in truth whatsoever (Obama's birth) but they've grabbed it and run with it simply because it's another wedge to divide the nation. It took Bush 8 years to wreck the economy, yet Republicans are turning on the propaganda machine against Obama because he couldn't turn it around in less than 200 days? Bush gave away three quarters of a trillion dollars to the banks with no strings attached, yet the Republicans are gleefully watching Obama twist in the wind while trying to come up with ways to pay for it? They're resisting everything Obama tries to do, throwing up every roadblock they can, then very publicly chastising him for not doing it?

Republicans can cry about Obama all they want, but it is the Republicans that are driving your country into the shiznitter with their hypocrisy, underhanded tactics, propaganda, etc. Divide and conquer, that is their goal.

And don't mistake me for some left-leaning loon, either. I am no liberal. I believe in capital punishment, I believe in stricter sentences for criminals, I am against governments supporting private businesses and I own and use guns (hunting rifles, anyway). I drive a big, polluting V8 T-Bird with no catalytic converters. I resent every nickel that goes to the taxman, especially when I see those nickels being wasted on the aforementioned corporate bailouts, or even worse, supporting a lazy bum of a woman whose sole means of earning a living is to keep herself constantly knocked up so she can stay on welfare indefinitely.

I'm no right wing nut job either. Being Canadian, and having experienced firsthand that just about all of the propaganda spread by US conservatives about public health care are untrue and the few tidbits that have some truth to them are far outweighed by the benefits, I fully support it. I also believe that the state should not be legislating morals, and that everyone should be given the same rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (and this includes gay marriage, immigration, freedom from religious persecution, etc). I think that corporate lobbying should be outlawed, as it is nothing more than legalized bribery (just as gov't should not be running private industry, private industry should not be running the government). And while I do not think the government should be paying for private business, I do believe they should be regulating it. Not excessively regulated, of course, but regulated just enough to keep it honest, both to shareholders and to the public (the lack of which being what got the economy to the point it is today).

Now, let's see how long it is before the insults start flying and the thread is locked (which will show, once and for all, why we cannot allow political discussions on this forum).
2015 Mustang GT Premium - 5.0, 6-speed, Guard Green - too much awesome for one car

1988 5.0 Thunderbird :birdsmily: SOLD SEPT 11 2010: TC front clip/hood ♣ Body & paint completed Oct 2007 ♣ 3.55 TC rear end and front brakes ♣ TC interior ♣ CHE rear control arms (adjustable lowers) ♣ 2001 Bullitt springs ♣ Energy suspension poly busings ♣ Kenne Brown subframe connectors ♣ CWE engine mounts ♣ Thundercat sequential turn signals ♣ Explorer overhead console (temp/compass display) ♣ 2.25" off-road dual exhaust ♣ T-5 transmission swap completed Jan 2009 ♣

Oh My...

Reply #39
Tell us how you really feel. :giggle:

EDIT:  That's not aimed at anyone.
1987 TC

Oh My...

Reply #40
LOL I think we should keep it going as long as possible Just to spite you Thunder Chicken!

On CforC though, It IS shiznit, and Chuck is right, Its going to bite us in the ass eventually.  I cant see how buying a newly manufactured vehicle is more environmentally friendly than running a reasonably fuel efficient older car....The environmental toll that manufacturing a new vehicle takes HAS to be far worse than running an older vehicle......Even with fuel millage savings.  I personally think that this had nothing to do with "going green" or whatever ( the main point supposedly of this program).  This simply had to do with money.

Think about it.  After GM and Chrysler went bankrupt after the feds shoved (how many) billions of dollars at them, the American public (in general) was PISSED.  C for C is simply just another way for the feds to funnel more money at them,  without us getting even more angry about it.  Instead of taxing the hell out of us to pay for bailout loans, they've duped the general public into buying cars that they do not really need, and are cloaking it as an "environmentally friendly" solution for our "oil dependency".  Thats funny as hell, considering that these vehicles still suck down gas. 
I think the point is here that we've been tricked into giving the automakers ANOTHER bailout, but this time we did it willingly.....OOPS... We've been DUPED.
88 TC, Lots of Mods.


Oh My...

Reply #41
Quote from: Thunder Chicken;285923
I would be really surprised if the disclaimer on the CARS site wasn't a product of the Dept of Homeland Security, and is likely buried somewhere on every gov website. You know, that same Dept of Homeland Security, the one trampling all over civil rights and liberties of US citizens daily.


there, fixed it

that way its not that hairy and its more topic related.


I have not checked on the site myself "personally", too spooked at the moment to attempt it.  I do have another laptop i dont mind being beheaded by the report so later this afternoon (i hope), I will do a screenshot of what it actually says just to see for myself.

Who has checked out this already,, verified its true?

Oh My...

Reply #42
Quote from: Chuck W;285919
The CARS program is shiznit, and it's going to come around and bite everyone in the ass.

(Don't mistake this for me being anywhere close to conservative in my political leanings...very far from it.  A bad idea is a bad idea, no matter where it comes from)


you think?
I dono, a car is a little more easier to afford than a house under the same conditions (ie- superfunding).

I would think a household income of 30k could likely afford a final balance of 20k spread out over a few years rather than 600k for a house spread across 30-50 years.

It has a banking appearance that its almost doable for many low income folks.

hope it works but........ I also hope it does not become a perm thing.

Oh My...

Reply #43
I think the thing that has everyone so worked up about what Glenn Beck highlighted is that all we have witnessed under Obama is a take over of banking and car companies under the guise that they are saving the economy. Once they loaned them money, they started telling them how to do business.  So when we see a warning that if we click in the wrong place the gov't will claim our personal property, everyone gets up in arms thinking that we are heading towards living in a gov't owned society.

I can't imagine us heading there, but it is a disturbingly, non-coincidental chain of events that should have us looking for "change" again.

Oh My...

Reply #44
Quote from: Thunder Chicken;285923
This thread has already gotten far more political than we generally allow on this forum, but what the hell, I'll throw some gas on the fire before it gets really ugly and inevitably closed. Time to push this thing off a cliff:

I would be really surprised if the disclaimer on the CARS site wasn't a product of the Dept of Homeland Security, and is likely buried somewhere on every gov website. You know, that same Dept of Homeland Security, the one trampling all over civil rights and liberties of US citizens daily, that is a Bush legacy. I don't know what's more deplorable: The Republicans' very active and very blatant (and very sadly, apparently successful) attempts at dividing the country, or the fact that many people are falling for the propaganda, and in turn spreading it themselves with no regard whatsoever as to its truthfulness (the ignorant, factless statements being made all over the place about C4C, such as what happens to the car when it's turned in, and people claiming you have to pay taxes on the grants are but two examples out of about eleventy billion). It's almost like the Republicans are gunning for civil war and are using any stupid old thing they can come up with to try to start it, including something that is likely very much a product of their own policies (the cars.gov disclaimer), and other things that are definitely  products of their own policies (the shiznitty economy, the auto bailout, which was a legacy of Bush, the even bigger banking bailout, which was another legacy of Bush, etc), not to mention things with no basis in truth whatsoever (Obama's birth) but they've grabbed it and run with it simply because it's another wedge to divide the nation. It took Bush 8 years to wreck the economy, yet Republicans are turning on the propaganda machine against Obama because he couldn't turn it around in less than 200 days? Bush gave away three quarters of a trillion dollars to the banks with no strings attached, yet the Republicans are gleefully watching Obama twist in the wind while trying to come up with ways to pay for it? They're resisting everything Obama tries to do, throwing up every roadblock they can, then very publicly chastising him for not doing it?

Republicans can cry about Obama all they want, but it is the Republicans that are driving your country into the shiznitter with their hypocrisy, underhanded tactics, propaganda, etc. Divide and conquer, that is their goal.

And don't mistake me for some left-leaning loon, either. I am no liberal. I believe in capital punishment, I believe in stricter sentences for criminals, I am against governments supporting private businesses and I own and use guns (hunting rifles, anyway). I drive a big, polluting V8 T-Bird with no catalytic converters. I resent every nickel that goes to the taxman, especially when I see those nickels being wasted on the aforementioned corporate bailouts, or even worse, supporting a lazy bum of a woman whose sole means of earning a living is to keep herself constantly knocked up so she can stay on welfare indefinitely.

I'm no right wing nut job either. Being Canadian, and having experienced firsthand that just about all of the propaganda spread by US conservatives about public health care are untrue and the few tidbits that have some truth to them are far outweighed by the benefits, I fully support it. I also believe that the state should not be legislating morals, and that everyone should be given the same rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (and this includes gay marriage, immigration, freedom from religious persecution, etc). I think that corporate lobbying should be outlawed, as it is nothing more than legalized bribery (just as gov't should not be running private industry, private industry should not be running the government). And while I do not think the government should be paying for private business, I do believe they should be regulating it. Not excessively regulated, of course, but regulated just enough to keep it honest, both to shareholders and to the public (the lack of which being what got the economy to the point it is today).

Now, let's see how long it is before the insults start flying and the thread is locked (which will show, once and for all, why we cannot allow political discussions on this forum).


I couldn't have said it any better myself - excellent post. And even though I do consider myself left-leaning, I also agree with that paragraph as I'm also a gun-owning libertarian who wants the governemt out of my life and wants them to learn to live with the tax revenue as it exists today (no more taxes.)
11.96 @ 118 MPH old 306 KB; 428W coming soon.