Skip to main content
Topic: 3.8 (Rebuild or Not to rebuild) (Read 3226 times) previous topic - next topic

3.8 (Rebuild or Not to rebuild)

Reply #15
at 100,000 or close to it miles, you genrally do not need all that machine work unless there is a very serious problem.

I did a 3.8 and paint for under 900bus with 330,000 miles.

At the time, the plasti gauge and mic's both said std mains would work, The only thng i would have done different back then was have the crank turned.  New std rings yielded about .020 end gap which i wanted less but they worked.

so a std ring/bearing/gasket kit ,,, plus the cost of paint and a little bit here and there brought me back up to speed. 

Like i said, the crank should have been turned and 10 over bearings.

If you cant assemble motors, hone your own block, lap your own valves, belt sand the head lengh ways full surface area, or own tools to measure / do the job,
the yes your amount would be very conservative!!. 
My motor was given away to a guy here that drove all the way from Mass.  I told him one of two things needed done, the crank need turned or ....
the sping valve in the timing cover needed replaced.  I am not really sure why I did not replace the oil presure valve in the timeing cover because it came with the new externall gear set.  Anyway , I sent him home with the presure valve, havent heard from him since.  To date I am just board wth the white coug, 20th is primary for now although i have all i need to do an HO in the white coug.  The more I drive the 4.6 in the Exploder, the more I feel like that would be nice as well.  So , until i figure out what I want, she sits.

Basing your numbers around someone else doing all the work kind of defeats the purpose of this forum dont you think?

see car domain for my old 3.8

3.8 (Rebuild or Not to rebuild)

Reply #16
Quote from: dw85745;231080
Innes:

I just went through the a rebuild on my 1984 3.8.  If I know what I know now, I'd have got a new vehicle.

Problem with the 3.8L is it  is a flat tappet cam.  This requires ZDDP additive to the oil, which is going to be harder to get in the future.
Given this, and the fact you can pick up a car getting around the same gas mileage -- cheap -- I'd go new.


Last I heard the 3.8 weak spot was the head gasket not the cam. That’s news to me, and as for the cam additives I thought they were for certain aftermarket cams (flat tappet) and for break-in only. Reason is something is missing in today’s oils but after break-in its fine that was the reason for pulling the mineral. Crane or comp sells this additive. Is this what your talking about and before I finish I’m no expert this is my hobby.

3.8 (Rebuild or Not to rebuild)

Reply #17
i remember the oil topic, it was very interesting.  Rotella still has zdp if that thread is accurate.

3.8 (Rebuild or Not to rebuild)

Reply #18
Quote from: jcassity;231202
at 100,000 or close to it miles, you genrally do not need all that machine work unless there is a very serious problem.
  ok his is a  1983  3.8 right?
in my shop, i have seen  engines with  25,000 to 50,000 miles  come in for there first oil change.  there have been some engines that didn't make the 100,000 mark  because  back in the 70's and 80's  the factory made them that way like plastic timing gears/burning exhaust valves and seats/soft cams/ a little spring  to hold the cam from walking out and 1983 3.8 was one of them?.) , heck even during that time i remember doing valve cover gasket on engnie  that would be so much sludge in there you couldn't see the rocker arms or pull the intake and the sludge would be all the way up to the intake valley pan>
.


At the time, the plasti gauge and mic's both said std mains would work, The only thng i would have done different back then was have the crank turned.  New std rings yielded about .020 end gap which i wanted less but they worked.

so a std ring/bearing/gasket kit ,,, plus the cost of paint and a little bit here and there brought me back up to speed. 

Like i said, the crank should have been turned and 10 over bearings.

 well what you did was not a rebuild .its called overhaul. he ask about rebuild didn't he?  overhauling  is a cheap short term way to get a engine back together and it not for long term. i have done those cheap OVERHAULS too  but no way would i do my or his mother car that way.




If you cant assemble motors, hone your own block, lap your own valves, belt sand the head lengh ways full surface area, or own tools to measure / do the job,
Basing your numbers around someone else doing all the work kind of defeats the purpose of this forum dont you think?

no, because there are alot of people that belong to these web sites  that have never had  ENGINE APART much less work on one,  any way ,they come to these sites and ask all those funny Questions not everybody has instance notion. well all started life a dum as box of rocks. some one had to teach us. that why these sites are so importand to some of us. even myself as questions on this and other sites, don't you?? !plus some one has to do the work. lot of people pay  some one else to have there long block rebuilt. most of them are called crate motor now days. some don't have the shop or tool to do the hole job or have the time to deal with a engine replacement.





with all the engines i have built over my life time, i'm no pro at the 3.8 and i'm the type of person with all the factory changes that  ford have been made with 3.8 over it life time.  my rides ,i would pull the 3.8 and put a V-8 in it place. i have yet to see one get more than couple of MPG better than the  V-8  i installed in it place. so why wasted money on the 3.8?? maybe i'm the wicked one. yes i know some states don't have the choice to swap to a v-8 and that why i don't live in those states. they take all the fun out of fix up old cars.
remember it easier to fix them, than to find them after they been crushed.

V6 = juvenile delinquency!

3.8 (Rebuild or Not to rebuild)

Reply #19
Quote from: rancheronut;231531
there have been some engines that didn't make the 100,000 mark because back in the 70's and 80's the factory made them that way like plastic timing gears/burning exhaust valves and seats/soft cams/ a little spring to hold the cam from walking out and 1983 3.8 was one of them?.).


NO,, that is incorrect.

No 83-88 fox had a platic timing gear

theres a lot of misleading information you have presented but I wont argue with your thoughts, you seem like a nice enough person.

pull and abe lincoln and do a little reading.........http://www.babpen 15s.com/editorial/ar/ar90134.htm


Lots of goodies in there for someone 4.2 project.

3.8 (Rebuild or Not to rebuild)

Reply #20
Quote from: jcassity;231536
NO,, that is incorrect.

No 83-88 fox had a platic timing gear

theres a lot of misleading information you have presented but I wont argue with your thoughts, you seem like a nice enough person.

pull and abe lincoln and do a little reading.........http://www.babpen 15s.com/editorial/ar/ar90134.htm


Lots of goodies in there for someone 4.2 project.




"1982-’83
The original flat-tappet cam was the E2DZ-6250-A. It had a hole machined in the front that had a steel sleeve in it that centered the spring-loaded thrust button. The short snout had an integral distributor gear machined on the front of it, and there was a cast, oblong  with two bolt holes in front of the first journal that was used to mount the timing gear."
"Beating the hell out of other peoples cars since 1999"
1983 Ford Thunderbird Heritage
1984 Ford Mustang GT Turbo Convertible
2015 Ford Focus SE 1.0 EcoBoost

3.8 (Rebuild or Not to rebuild)

Reply #21
i dont grasp your quote and response,, not sure what your saying there.

3.8 (Rebuild or Not to rebuild)

Reply #22
it was supposed to include the quote by rancheronut you quoted in your last reply highlighting and reguarding the spring button in the cam for the 83 v6 motor, i dont know why it didnt post that also?
i only meant to respond to that part of the quote because as you stated the other info is incorrect.
"Beating the hell out of other peoples cars since 1999"
1983 Ford Thunderbird Heritage
1984 Ford Mustang GT Turbo Convertible
2015 Ford Focus SE 1.0 EcoBoost