Skip to main content
Topic: Resurrecting Darkthunder (Read 4751 times) previous topic - next topic

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Some of you may have known about the 351w powered TC I had planned on trading up my 87TC for. Well me and my fiance decided to buy a house and I had to cancel the trade. I was pretty bummed out about it as I truly had my heart set on that ride. It is clean and practically rust free. Whoever gets it is a lucky chap. But anyways, once the house is secured, I "plan" on purchasing another DD. I've got my eyes set on a 90ish Grand Prix.... but who knows. I do know it won't be another Fox. I just CANNOT control the urge to modify. I've tried... I can't. Sometimes I feel like I need treatment, lol. This brings us to my current 87TC. It is not rust-free by any means and one day it will be crushed. Which brings us to darkthunder. Eventually I will set up a savings account specifically to fund Project Darkthunder. But I am having a hard time deciding which direction to take DT. Suspension wise I've got that locked down (in my head at least). Basically a carbon-copy of dogcharmer's front end, and in the rear a MM 3-link setup.

My problem is with the engine. Currently there is a carb'd 302 in the engine bay that was installed when I purchased it. Ran great up until I lost #1 cylinder and was forced to park it. I am looking for about 350 to 400hp street/race/showcar. Strictly a fun car. I may drive it to work "maybe" once a year. Originally I wanted a 4.6 DOHC TT setup, but that is well out of my realistic budget and HP range. Then there was the 427 stroker idea, but again out of HP range and budget. So here is what I narrowed it down to.

darkthunder v2.3
2.3t with Aluminum Head
T3/T4 Hybrid
Tubular Header
FMIC
EEC Mods or Standalone
Supporting Hardware

darkthunder v5.0
Mustang H.O. Engine w/EFI Setup
Aluminum Heads
347 Stroker Kit
EEC Mods
Supporting Hardware

I am leaning heavily towards the 2.3t, but there's that part of me deep down inside that wants that beloved V8 exhaust note. But the 5.0 conversion will be more expensive as I already have a head start on the 2.3t stuff. And since this won't be my daily, I'm not all that concerned with low-end torque streetablity. Also I am looking to achieve 50-50 weight bias (or as close as possible) so the the 2.3t scores another point there. But the 5.0 is a whole lot simpler and is the "road more traveled" so to speak. Parts are readily available as the 5.0 aftermarket makes the 2.3 look like it doesn't exist. Being different is cool, but when something breaks... especially when it's custom, or sold by one or two vendors, it can be more of a burden. But since it's not my daily that really shouldn't be a problem, but something to consider.

Yes I know there's been a ton of threads out there with the very same topic and this is partially subjective. I'm just interested in hearing opinions.

And with all of that said, which would "you" choose?

Thanks.

Reference Material
[Engine Weights]
[2.3 Cylinder Head Weight]
[Esslinger Info]
[306 vs 347 Comparison]
2005 Subaru WRX STi|daily driver

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #1
I'd say roll with wutcha got.

stick to the 347 in DT.

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #2
347!

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #3
Antonio, being different is good and all but sometimes tried and true is the key to happiness.  I would go with a fuel injected 302 block based engine.  This is what I chose for my 88 TC, EFI 302.  Whatever you do, put a 5 speed behind it!
One 88

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #4
i say stick with the v8, not much of 4 cyl fan.
1987 Cougar XR7 5.0 SOLD
1992 Ranger 4.0
2018 Hyundai Elantra
2019 Ram Rebel

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #5
how about a carburated 4.6 markVIII engine? theres lost of aftermarket stuff available to get that horse power cheap
95 Ranger Splash 2.3
88 Tbird Sport :ies::ies:
5.0 SO, stainless shorty headers, w/ Magnaflow lers. KYB struts, KYB shocks. 5lug conversion from sn95 Mustang, subframe connectors, drilled and slotted rotors, 03 Mach 1 wheels. sequential taillights.140 speedo

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #6
, no love for the 2.3T.  Oh well.

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #7
i love v8's but i love the fact that the 2.3t is so underestimated, for the power they can push, hence why i want to put one in a ranger, instead of a v8 swap
RIP 1988 and 1990 Lincoln Mark VII LSC
I welcomed the dark side and currently am driving a 2000 Dodge Durango SLT plus, with a 5.9, Code named project "Night Runner"
Shes black on black, fully loaded, with headers, 180 tstat, e fan, straight exhaust into a cherry bomb vortex ler, full tune up, ported intake and T/B, MSD coil, and round aircleaner.
Mods to come: Fully rebuilt and heavily modded 46RE, and a richmond rachet locker.
my $300 beater ;)
R.I.P Kayleigh Raposa 12/18/90 - 2/24/07

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #8
I like the carbed 4.6 idea. I spotted one in the local trading post that had the trans, harness, and ECM for $600.

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #9
2.3 THAT BEAST!  Be different! Heck, check out SLEEPERS currnt build, and that would be enough encouragement for me to build (if i had a bay that needed an engine). And, call me crazy, but I like the sound of a 2.3T better anyways (clearly an oppinion), v8's sound awsome as well. What edzactly do you mean by having a "headstart on the 2.3T stuff"? That could be a very could factore in your decision...

Frank M.

btw, that 85 is a sweet looking car!!
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/665379

1983 TurboCoupe-T3 .60/.63, 3" exhaust, Motorsport front mount, PJ, large VAM, green tops, 8.8" w/ 3.55's, 13.72@97mph
1985.5 SVO
1984 Fullsize Bronco- 300, NP435

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #10
2.3 THAT BEAST!  Be different! Heck, check out SLEEPERS currnt build, and that would be enough encouragement for me to build (if i had a bay that needed an engine). And, call me crazy, but I like the sound of a 2.3T better anyways (clearly an oppinion), v8's sound awsome as well. What edzactly do you mean by having a "headstart on the 2.3T stuff"? That could be a very good/big factore in your decision...

Frank M.

btw, that 85 is a sweet looking car!!
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/665379

1983 TurboCoupe-T3 .60/.63, 3" exhaust, Motorsport front mount, PJ, large VAM, green tops, 8.8" w/ 3.55's, 13.72@97mph
1985.5 SVO
1984 Fullsize Bronco- 300, NP435

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #11
351 5-Speed or 2.3T. The 2.3 will be a LOT more tempermental though, ask me how I know. Stay away from a n/a 4.6 for all you're worth. And even if you have the $$$ for a boosted one, go for a blown 302/347 or 351/408 instead...

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #12
hes got another t/c thats rotted, i guess he'll steal its motor, and send it on its way.
RIP 1988 and 1990 Lincoln Mark VII LSC
I welcomed the dark side and currently am driving a 2000 Dodge Durango SLT plus, with a 5.9, Code named project "Night Runner"
Shes black on black, fully loaded, with headers, 180 tstat, e fan, straight exhaust into a cherry bomb vortex ler, full tune up, ported intake and T/B, MSD coil, and round aircleaner.
Mods to come: Fully rebuilt and heavily modded 46RE, and a richmond rachet locker.
my $300 beater ;)
R.I.P Kayleigh Raposa 12/18/90 - 2/24/07

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #13
just how tempermental are the 2.3's to build?
RIP 1988 and 1990 Lincoln Mark VII LSC
I welcomed the dark side and currently am driving a 2000 Dodge Durango SLT plus, with a 5.9, Code named project "Night Runner"
Shes black on black, fully loaded, with headers, 180 tstat, e fan, straight exhaust into a cherry bomb vortex ler, full tune up, ported intake and T/B, MSD coil, and round aircleaner.
Mods to come: Fully rebuilt and heavily modded 46RE, and a richmond rachet locker.
my $300 beater ;)
R.I.P Kayleigh Raposa 12/18/90 - 2/24/07

Resurrecting Darkthunder

Reply #14
2.3T

More gratification , more milage , just plain fun.


;)
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
1974 maverick lsx powered turbo car SOLD
1973 maverick Tijuana Taxi Tribute
1957 chevy LSX Turbo project (race car)
Owner of Joe Dirt Fabrication