Skip to main content
Topic: Dyno Day is finally here.... (Read 6612 times) previous topic - next topic

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #15
Gotta figure out how to maximize what I have.
'88 Sport--T-5,MGW shifter,Trick Flow R intake,Ed Curtis cam,Trick Flow heads,Scorpion rockers,75mm Accufab t-body,3G,mini starter,Taurus fan,BBK long tube headers,O/R H-Pipe, Flowamaster Super 44's, deep and deeper Cobra R wheels, Mass Air and 24's,8.8 with 3.73's,140 mph speedo,Mach 1 chin spoiler,SN-95 springs,CHE control arms,aluminum drive shaft and a lot more..

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #16
Nice job, saw  video on the fb page

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #17
Quote from: vinnietbird;453732
I often wonder if the 70mm throttle body is big eough. He did say that the air/fuel was just about perfect. Nut I still wonder if a 75 would help at all.

70mm throttle body should be ok. A 75mm might be better. I'm contemplating going from a 70mm to 75mm throttle body on my Thunderbird as well.

You're running a BBK style cold air intake correct? If so there's power to be had with a better setup. 3.5 or 4 inch tubing between the MAF and throttle body will make more power. Also a 9 inch long conical filter clamped to the end of the MAF will make more power than the cold air intake you have. Basically just copy the setup I'm running ;). I know you're running a Cobra computer and MAF but a larger than 70mm MAF will help a bit too.

All the above changes could get you ~ 10hp or so. Maybe a bit more.
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #18
If there is no vacuum being created at WOT, at larger throttle body is totally unnecessary...

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #19
Quote from: TurboCoupe50;453752
If there is no vacuum being created at WOT, at larger throttle body is totally unnecessary...

Vinnie is the hole in the intake bigger than 70? I see you had TMoss work it, not sure what the result is with a GT40 intake. I think the 65 fits my TMoss-ported H.O. intake perfectly.
1987 20th Anniversary Cougar, 302 "5.0" GT-40 heads (F3ZE '93 Cobra) and TMoss Ported H.O. intake, H.O. camshaft
2.5" Duals, no cats, Flowmaster 40s, Richmond 3.73s w/ Trac-Lok, maxed out Baumann shift kit, 3000 RPM Dirty Dog non-lock TC
Aside from the Mustang crinkle headers, still looks like it's only 150 HP...
1988 Black XR7 Trick Flow top end, Tremec 3550
1988 Black XR7 Procharger P600B intercooled, Edelbrock Performer non-RPM heads, GT40 intake AOD, 13 PSI @5000 RPM. 93 octane

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #20
Vacuum is a measurement of restriction. Without vacuum there is no restriction.
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #21
The upper was untouched as the tubes don't allow for porting (tubular GT-40), and I'll check the opening. If it's not 75mm, I can make it 75mm easily.
'88 Sport--T-5,MGW shifter,Trick Flow R intake,Ed Curtis cam,Trick Flow heads,Scorpion rockers,75mm Accufab t-body,3G,mini starter,Taurus fan,BBK long tube headers,O/R H-Pipe, Flowamaster Super 44's, deep and deeper Cobra R wheels, Mass Air and 24's,8.8 with 3.73's,140 mph speedo,Mach 1 chin spoiler,SN-95 springs,CHE control arms,aluminum drive shaft and a lot more..

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #22
Quote from: TurboCoupe50;453752
If there is no vacuum being created at WOT, at larger throttle body is totally unnecessary...


True. However every time I've upped the size of some induction piece on my Thunderbird (MAF, throttle body, air filter, intake tubing) the car has gone faster in the 1/4 mile. It may not be necessary but for some reason it works.
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #23
Air is a compressible fluid. Pretty much all if it stays where the crazy white haired Asian guy on discovery channel goes. You can call it out everytime. As soon as it stops making sense, he pops up. Same with the guy on ancient aliens, not that there is ever much fact sharing there.

It's all theoretical physics. Part of the reason mustang guys can't figure out where the boost dropped on a s/c setup when they get better cylinder heads. The math says they had plenty before.
Quote from: jcassity
I honestly dont think you could exceed the cost of a new car buy installing new *stock* parts everywhere in your coug our tbird. Its just plain impossible. You could revamp the entire drivetrain/engine/suspenstion and still come out ahead.
Hooligans! 
1988 Crown Vic wagon. 120K California car. Wifes grocery getter. (junked)
1987 Ford Thunderbird LX. 5.0. s.o., sn-95 t-5 and an f-150 clutch. Driven daily and going strong.
1986 cougar.
lilsammywasapunkrocker@yahoo.com

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #24
Quote from: thunderjet302;453776
True. However every time I've upped the size of some induction piece on my Thunderbird (MAF, throttle body, air filter, intake tubing) the car has gone faster in the 1/4 mile. It may not be necessary but for some reason it works.

Then you had some restriction... No doubt sometimes it's so small that it's difficult to measure on a std vacuum gage... I never had more than a 65 on my 5.0, was happy with how it ran so never messed with it...  I have a 70mm for the 331...

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #25
Quote from: TurboCoupe50;453783
Then you had some restriction... No doubt sometimes it's so small that it's difficult to measure on a std vacuum gage... I never had more than a 65 on my 5.0, was happy with how it ran so never messed with it...  I have a 70mm for the 331...

No doubt. With the 65mm throttle body on the car a vacuum gauge would show 0 inches at WOT. I switched to a 70mm throttle body and it still showed 0 inches at WOT. However the car went 1 mph faster with the 70mm than the 65mm throttle body. Go figure. If I can find a cheap enough, quality (Accufab or Edelbrock) 75mm throttle body I may try it to see if it helps.

I think up sizing components (to a point) helps the engine accelerate and reach peak power faster, thereby improving 1/4 mile times. Sometimes changes won't show much power on a dyno or other measurement tool but help none the less.
88 Thunderbird LX: 306, Edelbrock Performer heads, Comp 266HR cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake, bunch of other stuff.

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #26
My 70 is fine, but I'd like to try a 75mm throttle boy. I have no funds for that for some time, but one day. My friend has a 75 on his 351W F-150. I'll borrow his and see if there's a difference.
'88 Sport--T-5,MGW shifter,Trick Flow R intake,Ed Curtis cam,Trick Flow heads,Scorpion rockers,75mm Accufab t-body,3G,mini starter,Taurus fan,BBK long tube headers,O/R H-Pipe, Flowamaster Super 44's, deep and deeper Cobra R wheels, Mass Air and 24's,8.8 with 3.73's,140 mph speedo,Mach 1 chin spoiler,SN-95 springs,CHE control arms,aluminum drive shaft and a lot more..

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #27
, good numbers Vinny. Your car must fly.

Dyno Day is finally here....

Reply #28
Thanks, the car does just fine. I rarely even hot rod the old Bird. Most of my driving is 2 miles to work, two miles home. I'd still like to optimize what I have.
'88 Sport--T-5,MGW shifter,Trick Flow R intake,Ed Curtis cam,Trick Flow heads,Scorpion rockers,75mm Accufab t-body,3G,mini starter,Taurus fan,BBK long tube headers,O/R H-Pipe, Flowamaster Super 44's, deep and deeper Cobra R wheels, Mass Air and 24's,8.8 with 3.73's,140 mph speedo,Mach 1 chin spoiler,SN-95 springs,CHE control arms,aluminum drive shaft and a lot more..