Skip to main content
Topic: 88 tbird sport stock height? (Read 1385 times) previous topic - next topic

88 tbird sport stock height?

When I first got my car, I wondered if the front springs were stock or aftermarket.  It's a 3.8 auto. Any parking curb I come up to, the lower air-dam hits it straight on.  Does anyone know any measurements to verify stock height?  spring length, air-dam to ground, k-member to ground, etc...?  I'm the 5th owner of the car, and so I guess anything's possible.
1987 TC

88 tbird sport stock height?

Reply #1
A guess is that they all sag. After all the car is what, 18-ish years old.

88 tbird sport stock height?

Reply #2
I was looking at springs the other day and i discovered that on partsamerica.com they list the specs of the TRW springs. Anyway this is what it says for 3.8 with A/C:

INSIDE DIA.= 3.5 in.; BAR DIA.= 0.64 in.; FREE HEIGHT= 15.38 in.; SPRING RATE= 415 Lbs./In.; LOAD= 1820 Lbs.; LOAD HEIGHT= 11 in.; END 1= SQUARE; END 2= TANGENTIAL

And here is the Sport:

INSIDE DIA.= 3.5 in.; BAR DIA.= 0.64 in.; FREE HEIGHT= 15.84 in.; SPRING RATE= 417 Lbs./In.; LOAD= 1695 Lbs.; LOAD HEIGHT= 11.75 in.; END 1= SQUARE; END 2= TANGENTIAL

And a Heavy Duty listing:

INSIDE DIA.= 3.5 in.; BAR DIA.= 0.656 in.; FREE HEIGHT= 15.13 in.; SPRING RATE= 462 Lbs./In.; LOAD= 1900 Lbs.; LOAD HEIGHT= 11 in.; END 1= SQUARE; END 2= TANGENTIAL

Looks like the height of the stock front springs installed is 11"  Hope that helps

88 tbird sport stock height?

Reply #3
Quote from: 84 Fila;119516
A guess is that they all sag. After all the car is what, 18-ish years old.


The front isn't very susceptible to sag.

88 tbird sport stock height?

Reply #4
Quote from: JeremyB;119575
The front isn't very susceptible to sag.

 
???
 
What magic keeps the front springs from sagging? Especially on a front engine car that's carrying close to 60% of its weight up there?

 

88 tbird sport stock height?

Reply #5
I made the statement that the front doesn't sag because
#1 - I've never seen a T-bird/Cougar with a sagging front end, but many with sagging rears.
#2 - I've never read of anybody complaining about a sagging front end, but many complaining about sagging rear ends.

I created a spreadsheet that calculated the shear stress at static spring length.

The front came out to ~88ksi.
The rear came out to ~55 ksi.

Therefore, it would seem that the front would fatigue first. But...I haven’t calculated the fatigue numbers yet.