Stock 5.0HO - MA vs SD - but I don't understand something...
All,
Okay, my apologies if this is something of a dumb question.
Almost any reference I've come across says that Ford switched from Speed Density to Mass Air on the 5.0 HO in 1989.
Fine, all well and good.
However, everything I've come across also says that:
1) Fuel economy went down by about 1 MPG city and 2 MPG highway.
2) Despite not changing the ratings on paper, the engine actually lost some power.
and
3) The Mass Air system, as calibrated from the factory, runs a bit on the rich side, and there's actually power to be gained by leaning it out (probably also the lost fuel economy as well).
Okay, I could understand that . . *IF* the system were running open-loop. But shouldn't the computer know to lean things out because the oxygen sensors should be sending a signal basically saying "Hey moron, you're running too rich here!"?
So, why does the stock 5.0HO mass-air system run richer, and thus with less power and fuel economy, than it should?