Skip to main content
Topic: gear ratio (Read 6221 times) previous topic - next topic

gear ratio

Reply #30
Only advice I have for you is to get the most out of what you have until you get something better under the hood. If you haven't done so already, perform a full tune up. Plugs, wires, cap, rotor, fuel filter, and air filter. Block off EGR. Gut the cats. Replace ler with something that will flow. I'm ready to catch hell for the next one. Up the ignition timing. Just advance it a little bit and test it. If it is hard to start than you have gone too far. If it has a "popcorn popper" sound when going up a hill, you have gone too far. If you are not comfortable doing it completely blind, use a vac gage and go for most vac, then do the test drive. I don't believe in timing guns.

gear ratio

Reply #31
Yea i know sperding is illegal but i cant help it dometimes lol. The emissions are stock as well.

gear ratio

Reply #32
I've decided to go with the 5.0 ho swap. I've come to realize is not much i can do with my v6. So im gonna replace it with a v8.

gear ratio

Reply #33
like all the other guys said it takes lots of fund to make a v6 powerful. but after you do make a v6 powerful its totally worth it. if you want to do a few things to your v6 then i would start off with the small things like- underdrive pulleys, exhaust system, timing, roller rockers upgrade, windstar upper and lower intake upgrade then rebuilt the engine and rear end to your liking.
p.s plus with my stock gears which were 2:73 gears i topped out of like 125-130mph with my v6. its just now with my modified v6/  with built transmission and traction lock 3:73  rear end i can just top the car out quicker.
84 el camino ss-daily driver(efi mild sbc,2004r, posi 3:42 rear.)
84 mercury cougar v6- was a v6/ nitrous drag car, going back to mostly stock
81 chevy malibu-protouring/  drag car.( efi sbc supercharged 283 that will rev to the moon, 2004r, 4:11 posi rear)

gear ratio

Reply #34
Quote from: Jmoore87;371833
I've decided to go with the 5.0 ho swap. I've come to realize is not much i can do with my v6. So im gonna replace it with a v8.

you're not the first and won't be the last person to realize that. I'm just to  stubborn to do it;)
--SteveN 👍
[thread=28690]1988 Cougar V6[/thread]
2012 F-150 3.7L

gear ratio

Reply #35
Wo
I spend money I don't have, To build  cars I don't need, To impress people I don't know

HAVE YOU DRIVEN A FORD LATELY!!

gear ratio

Reply #36
Quote from: Jmoore87;371293
Yes ive taken my car to its limits several times  mainly on the highway

Quote from: Chrome;371300
I knew these speeds were not happening legally. A big majority of us on this site break the law by driving our cars with missing, altered, or disabled emission control devices. No judgement here.

Judgement here. Missing, altered, or disabled emissions devices won't kill yourself or someone else if you lose control, etc.
Stock brakes on our cars are barely adequate for the speed limits..let alone anything at near twice that. Stock suspensions, worn ball joints, and tie rods....just a recipe for bad bad luck.

I lost a very good friend who was in the prime of her life because she was in a shiznitty car that was beyond it's limits just going one mph over the speed limit.
At least buckle up and do stupid shiznit on a country road where there's no traffic.
'98 Explorer 5.0
'20 Malibu (I know, Chevy, but, 35MPG. Let's go brandon, eh)

gear ratio

Reply #37
Quote from: ThunderbirdSport302;377993
Judgement here. Missing, altered, or disabled emissions devices won't kill yourself or someone else if you lose control, etc.
Stock brakes on our cars are barely adequate for the speed limits..let alone anything at near twice that. Stock suspensions, worn ball joints, and tie rods....just a recipe for bad bad luck.

I lost a very good friend who was in the prime of her life because she was in a shiznitty car that was beyond it's limits just going one mph over the speed limit.
At least buckle up and do stupid shiznit on a country road where there's no traffic.


I'm not going to argue with this. I myself keep stupid driving where there is little to no traffic, and brake upgrades are first on my list for my car. I repair bad steering components immediatly. I simply stated I will not judge him for his illegal behavior. He did not mention if the highway was busy or not. If it is a highly used highway, shame on him. It was my assumption that it was not busy.

gear ratio

Reply #38
Re
I spend money I don't have, To build  cars I don't need, To impress people I don't know

HAVE YOU DRIVEN A FORD LATELY!!

gear ratio

Reply #39
Quote from: TOM Renzo;378028
Removing the egr has not shown any horsepower gains on mostly bolt-on or stock engine combos. The egr does not function at wide open throttle anyway. Removing it by simply disconnecting it and blocking it off does in fact remove part throttle performance. The EEC uses the EGR, along with various other sensors, to adjust timing, fuel pulse and the like. If you want to delete it the correct way either buy a egr simulator on electronic ones or have it tuned. And dont forget for the automatic cars a new modulator is mandatory. Non EGR cars use a different Modulator and not changing it will smoke you tranny in. Also your cylinder temps will rise by leaps and bounds. And this destroys performance.

Cats new 200 cell cats actually make performance a bit better. Hot exhaust gas moves much more easily than cool exhaust. Hence a cat can increase HP very slightly in some applications. We tested a 500 Hp chevy with and without a cat and the difference was so close we could not tell the difference on the DYNE.

Timing your timing has to be tailored by a given number of total degrees with the available amount of timing designed in a distributor or ECM. To much will kill the top end. Just sying that is my $.02 For what ever it is worth. If yo use a vacuum gauge to set timing you will most likely advance way to much. Reasom being is any engine at idle will increase vacuum with an early engine timing parameter. Once again just me.


I have never seen a 302/5.0 that liked more than 36 degrees total. Most make the most power with 34 or slightly less.

I made the post about the EGR delete and cat removal prior to the octane thread. I suppose one could go to that thread to see the whole argument. You may be right about EGR delete not helping as far as top speed is concerned as long as it is functioning properly. EGR delete may increase acceleration because there will no longer be diluted air fuel mixture in the cylinders. Cat gutting or removal will increase power. Your views on this may be correct with the new cars or aftermarket performance cats, but this is an 88. My 96 Cougar had Flowmasters, gutted cats, and 02 simulators in the rear. Exhaust was the only modification performed, and performance differences were like night and day. As for the timing, your parameters may be off a little since this does not have a 5.0 at this time. Timing with Vacuum gauge will be closer than U may think. Disconnect everything like U would for timing with a light. If you find detonation, it is indeed too advanced and should be retarded ASAP. Don't wish to get in another argument about this. This is just the way I see it. I know it is perposterous to U, but it works for me. By the way, I have never heard of a EGR simulator. Finding a different modulator for the trans may be a little tricky, since I have never seen an AOD equipped car not equipped with EGR from the factory.

gear ratio

Reply #40
xx
I spend money I don't have, To build  cars I don't need, To impress people I don't know

HAVE YOU DRIVEN A FORD LATELY!!

 

gear ratio

Reply #41
Quote from: TOM Renzo;378050
When an engine that is computer controlled sees an egr valve open it immediately richens up the mixture, As posted above in my answer i explained that. It also drops the vacuum and once again the ecm compensates for that. The ECM is looking for egr at certain times and when it does not see it it does not change the mixture and timing parameters. So it does not respond as it was programed to do. The extra vacuum from the deleated EGR sends wrong amounts of vacuum to the transmission equipped with a vacuum modulator.This in turn speeds up the shift points and also degrades performance. And reduces line pressure.  Granted newer units dont have modulators any more. But never the less the MAP gets the wrong vacuum signal and further complicates the issue. Deleting an EGR is not a good thing to do and reduces performance.  As for deleting the rear o2 sensors by tuning them out is useless in a state that does emissions. The new  test benches test for that  and bingo YOU FAIL. These guys got wise to that several years ago. So if and when your state does emissions on obd2 vehicles they just may fail you car and they will. Or they man not have the latest up dated machines as we have in CT. Or a visual check may be mandatory. Either way the rear o2 sensors do not effect tuning. They are only cat efficiency testers Either way we will never agree on this so lets drop it. Once again the DYNE does not lie and if you remove the EGR you loose power and the dyne shows that infatically. Lets call it a day.
I do agree that we should just drop it. Just to let U know, the O2 simulators was just to keep the check engine light off. No emission testing in this part of my state.