http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=4559161528&category=6240 (http://"http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=4559161528&category=6240")
, I almost asked where it washiznit, then I realized the car has kind of a banana shape to it from front to back. Yeesh.
:eek: oh no, not a Bill Elliott edition wreaked. :mad: well, it was a nice car. :mad:
Yea thats a shame, does look like it has been gararged and stored most if not all its life...
23,000 miles :mad: only 23,000 friggin miles and an Elliott Edition :mad: Whyyyyyyyhyhyyyy
That is a shame, but it would make one helluva parts car. By looking at the pics it doesn't look like a "Bill Elliott" 'Bird was much more than a base 'Bird with stickers, rims, ground effects and a spoiler. It's not even an LX (base seats, base cluster, column shift). One would think that a clone "Bill Elliott" 'Bird could be built rather easily using that one for parts. I know BE Birds are rare, but from the looks of that one they don't have anything to really set them apart from other 'Birds - same SO engine, same consolette and column shift, nothing special for materials (base cloth seats), etc. I'd rather have a Sport, myself...
I know little about the BE Birds, but wasn't it a package added by the dealers??? In that case I suspect they could be any model, would just have to be RED. Sure would be interesting to see the DSO on one of those....
And to think, it WAS a nice car. That is the true definition of a shame.
I'd like to see a close up of those wheels. I don't recognize them. The interior doesn't looks good at all. Looks rather worn to me.
3.73 Rear end? I doubt it.