Fox T-Bird/Cougar Forums

General => Lounge => Topic started by: TOM Renzo on September 03, 2012, 10:28:15 PM

Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TOM Renzo on September 03, 2012, 10:28:15 PM
http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/2012/Obama+Administration+Finalizes+Historic+54.5+mpg+Fuel+Efficiency+Standards
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: bryan163 on September 03, 2012, 10:38:43 PM
Not really sure what to make of that one. Seems like a good idea, but I'm sure we'll get screwed somehow. They'll probably banish our cars from the road.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Chrome on September 03, 2012, 10:47:25 PM
Only way to accomplish this at this time would be if all vehicles were hybrid. I don't know how efficient battery recycling is, but it seems to me that we are trading one form of pollution for another. Wish they would back off of this and explore CNG. It would be much easier to convert older vehicles to CNG than electric hybrids. Government will kill our hobby just yet!
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: jcassity on September 03, 2012, 11:05:52 PM
yeah, chevy volt out the door now,, seems like there is some degree of lack of confidence in the realistic approach.
sounds good on paper but sooner than you think, it will be illegal to even own a weapon such as ours and drive it on the road because all the other cars will not stand a chance if hit by us.  For once, our front ends might not shatter with thier light weight tin foil cars.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TheFoeYouKnow on September 03, 2012, 11:16:51 PM
This isn't saying that every car and truck that any automaker builds has to get 54.5mpg, its saying that the automaker has to average 54.5 across their lineup.  Having a Volt that averages 100 mpg-e means that gm can have trucks that get 25 mpg,  if you add the combined fuel econ together for the whole line and divide by the number of models,  your average will need to be 54.5 minimum. I think this is doable in the space of 13 years.  What will it look like? No idea.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Chrome on September 03, 2012, 11:20:09 PM
Quote from: TheFoeYouKnow;397350
This isn't saying that every car and truck that any automaker builds has to get 54.5mpg, its saying that the automaker has to average 54.5 across their lineup.  Having a Volt that averages 100 mpg-e means that gm can have trucks that get 25 mpg,  if you add the combined fuel econ together for the whole line and divide by the number of models,  your average will need to be 54.5 minimum. I think this is doable in the space of 13 years.  What will it look like? No idea.
That's a mighty high average.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Crazy88 on September 04, 2012, 02:35:41 AM
This whole discussion is laughable when standards are being set based upon nothing more than rhetorical nonsense.  How many years advance notice does it take before we can set standards that require all new cars to operate on recycled elephant pee?  Is 50 years too soon? Would such lunacy also be viewed by the ignorant as a great achievement?  What exactly has been accomplished by setting a standard so high, yet no current technology can begin to achieve? 

Someone deigned to mention the Chevy Volt...on a FORD site no less.  That heresy aside, lets take a look at the volt shall we?  Its range on a full overnight charge is about 25 miles, at which point it's forced to run on gasoline.  However, this isn't some featherweight automobile we are talking about.  There are about 1500 lbs. of batteries and associated electronics being hauled around.  What is wrong with that you might ask?  Well, consider the fact that when running on gasoline, real world number suggest that on the Volt's best day and under ideal cirspoogestances, when it comes to gasoline, it slurps it faster than the most heavily optioned SUV.  I know, I know...so it runs on electricity those first 25 miles right?  So how does the majority of the electricity in the United States get generated?  Can anyone say COAL... you know that shiny black stuff that the jolly old fat man leaves for naughty children?  I know, that no fair, since we should let these little inconvenient facts get in the way or anything... After all, we are trying to turn green.  A little hint for the truly stupid.  You have a better chance of turning blue than turning green... hold you breath and stamp you feet and it could happen.  Of course I suppose that if you hold your breath long enough, you would die and maybe eventually rot, thus fulfilling your dreams of recycling and becoming as green as the fresh BS some have been shoveling...

Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TOM Renzo on September 04, 2012, 05:55:25 AM
Going GREEN IS VERY EXPENSIVE FOR US PEONS!!! The big shots always come out smelling like ROSES!!! I know it is an average but that is why GM makes the HHR. And Chrysler makes the PT CRUSER. They are used to average the mileage from bad to GOOD. But 54 that is completely NUTS and wont be easy to accomplish. Then you have the people that want to CRUSH OUR RIDES. Ask them they will telly you so. I had a PRIUS owner bash my Mustang at the local SHOP RIGHT the other day. The lady who was lets say not so PETITE told me i was a PIG!!! And was killing her air. I responded by telling her all my cars are state inspected and pass every emission test every 2 years. But they dont  care. So lets get some good shoes as they want us walking. 88 is correct the energy has to come from somewhere. And these tree huggers dont want you to have a car that spews out HP and is bigger than a chevy AVEO. Time will end our passion as we are loosing the BATTLE and the Tree Huggers ar winning the WAR!!!
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TheFoeYouKnow on September 04, 2012, 08:53:21 AM
So much hate, I may have gotten a sunburn from reading your post, Tom.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: 1BadBird on September 04, 2012, 10:00:46 AM
Quote from: TOM Renzo;397357
Going GREEN IS VERY EXPENSIVE FOR US PEONS!!! The big shots always come out smelling like ROSES!!! I know it is an average but that is why GM makes the HHR. And Chrysler makes the PT CRUSER. They are used to average the mileage from bad to GOOD. But 54 that is completely NUTS and wont be easy to accomplish. Then you have the people that want to CRUSH OUR RIDES. Ask them they will telly you so. I had a PRIUS owner bash my Mustang at the local SHOP RIGHT the other day. The lady who was lets say not so PETITE told me i was a PIG!!! And was killing her air. I responded by telling her all my cars are state inspected and pass every emission test every 2 years. But they dont  care. So lets get some good shoes as they want us walking. 88 is correct the energy has to come from somewhere. And these tree huggers dont want you to have a car that spews out HP and is bigger than a chevy AVEO. Time will end our passion as we are loosing the BATTLE and the Tree Huggers ar winning the WAR!!!


I agree!
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TOM Renzo on September 04, 2012, 12:23:30 PM
Thanks BAD BIRD You got it and understand their agenda.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: ZondaC12 on September 04, 2012, 06:23:42 PM
Hey....even if we have to go backward with horsepower again, last time we only hit 400-500 horsepower (which was Gross rating anyway), now we have SAE certified 700+ horsepower out of the Shelby Super Snake, the Bugatti Veyron at over 1k if you count the high-roller toys, SSC Ultimate Aero at over 1k as well to stay American.

All of us on here play with old stuff, anyone that did back in the 70s still got to have fun. It'll be the same drill LOL!!!
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: bryan163 on September 04, 2012, 08:33:07 PM
Im just hoping my bird and supra never have to pass an emissions test again. As long as my cars are exempt I don't care what they do with new cars.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Cougars 2 go on September 04, 2012, 09:18:01 PM
“This historic agreement builds on the progress we’ve already made to save families money at the pump..." and buttstuff rape them at the showroom.

"Simply put, this groundbreaking program will result in vehicles that use less gas, travel farther, and provide more efficiency for consumers than ever before—all while protecting the air we breathe and giving automakers the regulatory certainty to build the cars of the future [anywhere but] here in America,”
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: JKATHRE on September 04, 2012, 10:41:54 PM
It seems technical and medical advances always come with war.  Now maybe the government wants to make a war to push the issue.  On the funny side right now, it would look to me like such vehicles must be rickshaws with lawn mower engines?
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Beau on September 04, 2012, 10:58:05 PM
Instead of g and moaning here, write letters to your state's senators and reps. They're the ones who ultimately vote on this bullshiznit. O can pose and make noises while moving his mouth, it's the congresspeople who are the movers and shakers.

Like I said, but some stamps, some envelopes, and some Bic pens, and get to it....


Also, I agree. There's really no such thing as "green" energy. CNG is probably a little cleaner than electricity in the long run though. And before some candidate for being brain-dead hops up, nuclear energy is dirtier than the shiznit from a sack of house cats. That shiznit does NOT go away anytime soon.

So Mr. Fatcat, tree-huggin', commie rat bastid, let's save the ed world NOW, you can very disrespectfully take your so-called green energy and shove it up yer scroungy farkin' ass.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Chrome on September 05, 2012, 12:44:50 AM
Quote from: ThunderbirdSport302;397422
Instead of g and moaning here, write letters to your state's senators and reps. They're the ones who ultimately vote on this bullshiznit. O can pose and make noises while moving his mouth, it's the congresspeople who are the movers and shakers.

Like I said, but some stamps, some envelopes, and some Bic pens, and get to it....


Also, I agree. There's really no such thing as "green" energy. CNG is probably a little cleaner than electricity in the long run though. And before some candidate for being brain-dead hops up, nuclear energy is dirtier than the shiznit from a sack of house cats. That shiznit does NOT go away anytime soon.

So Mr. Fatcat, tree-huggin', commie rat bastid, let's save the ed world NOW, you can very disrespectfully take your so-called green energy and shove it up yer scroungy farkin' ass.
:bowdown:
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: jcassity on September 05, 2012, 01:00:58 AM
tom, nobody is losing anything in my neck of the woods.  I run into people like you mentioned and at the end of the day i win every time.  Facts kill people like that.  There are plenty of permanent residents in arlington cemetary that were convinced they were serving to prevent this among other things from happening.


Thought for the day...yes i have the T-shirt..........

"Support Coal ~ buy an electric car"

I love green everything but it has to be logical and the economics need to be there as well.

as for Gas mileage,, i think my wifes 1970 Ghia has all of them beat and as intersting as it is, Thunderchicken kinda schooled me a couple years ago on defining Efficiency in real terms so here you go.........

35hp engine gets 29mpg.
so does that mean that nothing has changed since then,, its my belief this thing called efficiency should be of a linear plotable reference such that the MPG of any car today would be inefficient compared to a 42year old car.

yes i think its possible especially since that long ago the mpg was within reach.  Do i think people want to not have all thier little buttons, cooling and all the luxurious comforts they have grown to "need",, no i dont. 
At this very moment weight loss programs on cars to include lighter weight designs will infact make my prediction come true in that soon within this decade it will not be legal to drive these cars becasue we could cause too much damage to all the plastic ones running around. 

good comments crazy88 although now im probably in double trouble because i also brought up a VW.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: jcassity on September 05, 2012, 01:12:26 AM
Quote from: ThunderbirdSport302;397422
Instead of g and moaning here, write letters to your state's senators and reps. They're the ones who ultimately vote on this bullshiznit. O can pose and make noises while moving his mouth, it's the congresspeople who are the movers and shakers.

Like I said, but some stamps, some envelopes, and some Bic pens, and get to it....


Also, I agree. There's really no such thing as "green" energy. CNG is probably a little cleaner than electricity in the long run though. And before some candidate for being brain-dead hops up, nuclear energy is dirtier than the shiznit from a sack of house cats. That shiznit does NOT go away anytime soon.

So Mr. Fatcat, tree-huggin', commie rat bastid, let's save the ed world NOW, you can very disrespectfully take your so-called green energy and shove it up yer scroungy farkin' ass.

I know you mean well but i have exercised that option well beyond your average citizen and one thing i have learned is this.  You will find a whole bunch of good listeners and not a single "DO'er" to be found when you really need them to "DO".  You see, the gov is structured in a top down organizational chart, so no real ownership of a problem is identified.  What this means is there is no true responsibility in one persons power to have a clean cut and positive effect.  What you want today might not really be on someones radar to even care about now or 2, 4 or 10 years from now.  I should go update my "REAL ID ACT OF 2005" thread, my very last attempt at doing what you said.  At the end of the day, your monitored and must give up so much,, coming soon to your local DMV.

so , for me, your living in la la land if you think for a moment you or even 10,000 of you can get a senator or a congressman to do  for you unless there is something in it for them "personally".  To be honest, they dont really even at the very least care at all of you or your livelyhood.  This is why you need your freedom to take personal responsibilty for your own choices and **instruct them*** to stay out of your way.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: beast50 on September 05, 2012, 03:58:01 AM
So the sabatoge continues:

1. Raise the ethanol to 15% minimum in all pump gas
2. Mandatory emmission testing and inspections in all 50 states
3. Gas guzzler taxes on anything making less than 20mpg
4. Another cash for clunkers like "incentive" to sucker in people
5. Gas being raised to the point it will be ridiculous to fillup these "old" cars
6. Cutting back even more vital engine oil qualities for our cast iron blocks; remember zinc?

It's a sad state we are in to have an older car.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Haystack on September 06, 2012, 10:14:44 PM
Quote from: beast50;397438
So the sabatoge continues:

1. Raise the ethanol to 15% minimum in all pump gas
2. Mandatory emmission testing and inspections in all 50 states
3. Gas guzzler taxes on anything making less than 20mpg
4. Another cash for clunkers like "incentive" to sucker in people
5. Gas being raised to the point it will be ridiculous to fillup these "old" cars
6. Cutting back even more vital engine oil qualities for our cast iron blocks; remember zinc?

It's a sad state we are in to have an older car.

In utah

10% ethonal on ALL gas.
No exemption for emissions on cars made after 1967

The switch to ethonal resulted in about 7% WORSE fuel economy.
Gas prices already are rediculous for these old cars
Newer cars do not nessicarly get better mpg.

Compare a geo metro to a prius. I'll bet one didn't have missions upon millions in reseach and hybrid technology.

Put an 8 speed automatic behind one of our cars with multipul cylinder displacement, and I'll bet the numbers aren't far off of modern cars. Modern cars weigh more now then they did in the 60's and have 10 times the saftey equipment. How many airbags do you need?

I'll bet the rechargeable battery packs in hybrid cars are worse for the enviorment then the emissions.

Let's look at efficiency in transformation of energy. How much power do you loose by converting mechanical energy(gas motor) to stored energy(batteries) back into mechanical(drive wheels) plus the additional energy transformation from coal, to heat, to steam, to electricity, to your power grid.

Hybrids aren't the solution, they are a bandaid to buy time and cost the average do-gooder a buttload of money.

I am a firm beleiver that a all electric car will not be acceptable to the average consumer until lipo's start being used in conversions. This will at least get us close to the same weight, power, and range of a conventional gas motor. Still stuck with the hours long re-charge, which is why hybrids sell, and electrics don't.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: shame302 on September 06, 2012, 10:54:55 PM
Ethanol is a liberal scam.

Any "good" it's doing is negated by worse fuel economy with it's use. So, we use huge amounts of grain resources that could be used to feed people/livestock to produce a fuel/supplement for cars that don't need or benefit from it. All it results in is a more expensive and less efficient fuel. If you run E85, you use 30% more fuel (require 30% more injector) in volume compared to petro. It's sideways logic.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Crazy88 on September 06, 2012, 11:03:38 PM
Quote from: shame302;397603
Ethanol is a liberal scam.

Any "good" it's doing is negated by worse fuel economy with it's use. So, we use huge amounts of grain resources that could be used to feed people/livestock to produce a fuel/supplement for cars that don't need or benefit from it. All it results in is a more expensive and less efficient fuel. If you run E85, you use 30% more fuel (require 30% more injector) in volume compared to petro. It's sideways logic.

In addition to your statement of facts, which I happen to agree with, the federal government, e.g. taxpayers subsidize the production and distribution of ethanol. That being said, we are paying more for fuel that isn't as efficient, in effect paying for the ethanol twice, all in the name of burning less gasoline.  It is a scam being sold to people that have been taught not to question those that make such decisions and we we dare question them about the logic of these decisions, we are labeled as wackos or extremists.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TOM Renzo on September 07, 2012, 06:36:28 AM
I was once told it took 8 gallons of gas to make 10 gallons of ethanol. We are going back words very fast. As for the CAFE issue the politicians are in control and they hate us GEAR HEADS. They say so all the time. I get looks when in the gas station and comments like i had a car like that when i was young. And i get comments like i should not have sold it. This is from a guy driving a Honda FIT and is trying to convince me he is in to great cars back in the day. So as i see it he fell pray to the ban everything crowd and drives an overgrown GOLF CART. Government has a way of forcing things on people without them even knowing what happened. The price of gas the increase of ethanol and a tax on gas guzzlers including old cars is just around the corner. It is a shame and a crime to me that our cars that are truly cars as we know it will come to extinction. So what will be the next generation of collectible cars?? And what will the sites like this be called??? I know the envio friendly car shop for low performance restoration. I can see it now!!! Hay guys just modified my FIT with a fusion capacitor and got an extra 2 HP out out of my engine. I dynowed it at 21 rear wheel HP TODAY. Not for me and it sucks plain and simple Thanks
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: jcassity on September 07, 2012, 08:13:50 AM
Quote from: TOM Renzo;397614
Government has a way of forcing things on people without them even knowing what happened.

there are three kinds of people in the world
those who want things to happen
those who make things happen
and those who stand around wondering what just happend.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Crazy88 on September 07, 2012, 02:55:08 PM
Quote from: TOM Renzo;397614
I can see it now!!! Hay guys just modified my FIT with a fusion capacitor and got an extra 2 HP out out of my engine. I dynowed it at 21 rear wheel HP TODAY.

Are you sure that was horsepower and not torque measured in inch pounds?  Methinks you might be giving the braindead too much credit. ;)
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: shame302 on September 07, 2012, 11:47:14 PM
Hmmm, Turns out, It's not a liberal lie. Republicans are responsible for ethanol.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Crazy88 on September 08, 2012, 12:05:08 AM
Quote from: shame302;397701
Hmmm, Turns out, It's not a liberal lie. Republicans are responsible for ethanol.

Oh really?  I would like to point out that there are liberals and retarded on BOTH sides of the aisle, so beyond rhetoric, the statement is true, regardless of the party that the liberal in question HAPPENED to belong to.  But back to your rhetoric for a moment... you claim that Republicans are responsible for Ethanol, but I would like you to share your source of this information.  Further, would it be fair to say that A Republican may have introduced the legislation to subsidize Ethanol production, and certainly not something I agree with. But laying that argument aside for a moment, would you agree that there is a difference between subsidizing ethanol production and mandating ethanol be used in consumer gasoline? Whose idea was that, where did they get the authority to mandate such things and if by regulation, where was the authority to regulate derived from, Hmm?
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TheFoeYouKnow on September 08, 2012, 03:33:13 AM
I think we've reached the point where somebody should point out that the rules prohibit political discussion on this board.  Just sayin'.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Crazy88 on September 08, 2012, 04:46:08 AM
Quote from: TheFoeYouKnow;397709
I think we've reached the point where somebody should point out that the rules prohibit political discussion on this board.  Just sayin'.
Yeah, I think you may be right, but I would like to point out two things: First, everything we see and do has something to do with politics.  If you discusss any subject long enough, that is exactly where you are going to end up.  Secondly, does it strike anyone else as a bit odd that it was shame302 that used the phrase "liberal scam" in the first place as quoted below... emphasis mine.

Quote from: shame302;397603
Ethanol is a liberal scam.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TOM Renzo on September 08, 2012, 06:46:49 AM
Quote from: TheFoeYouKnow;397709
I think we've reached the point where somebody should point out that the rules prohibit political discussion on this board.  Just sayin'.


You are most likely correct but tell me all about it when you are rebuilding your entire fuel system because of the increase of ethinol that will be mandated!!!!:beatyoass::beatyoass::beatyoass:
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Beau on September 08, 2012, 07:40:43 AM
If you're building a c that's old enough to have issues with 10% ethanol, I'd reckon the fuel system needs some work regardless..
Tom Renzo...you can run up to 25-30% ethanol on most cars made in the last 15-20 years with no issues.

Fact.

As far as the politics, I don't give a shiznit. It's all about who has a bigger check book and can tell the best and least painful lies.

And...ethanol is probably a cleaner fuel than most of the alternatives...also, it has more energy than gasoline.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TheFoeYouKnow on September 08, 2012, 08:40:59 AM
But you have to run it richer, which can make up for it's energy density.  I don't want ethanol, not really, I see the good, but I can't look past the bad.  If we get 15% (doubtful as congress just put that idea down) and I need to make fuel system changes, I'll make fuel system changes and not cry, because I'm a big boy and I do what has to be done.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: shame302 on September 08, 2012, 10:34:16 AM
Well, I attributed it's use as a left wing move as they are the ones who cry about the environment and the use of evil oil the loudest. That was my mistake. While republicans push the legislature through (somebody must be making money) the environment and oil dependance are largely left handed issues. It's no suprise that California was the first to ban MBTA and switch to ethanol.

In 2005 #43, George Bush Signed into legislature Energy Policy Act of 2005. The act originally called for 4 billion gallons of Biofuel (Ethanol) be mixed with gasoline by 2006 and 7.5B by 2012. Two years later, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires that by 2022 36B be mixed with gasoline. This is why Ethanol is in your fuel.


Feel free to defend it and explain why it's good policy. I do not see it. (in regards to ethanol use and subsidies).
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: jcassity on September 08, 2012, 10:49:42 AM
Quote from: Crazy88;397710
Yeah, I think you may be right, but I would like to point out two things: First, everything we see and do has something to do with politics.  If you discusss any subject long enough, that is exactly where you are going to end up.  Secondly, does it strike anyone else as a bit odd that it was shame302 that used the phrase "liberal scam" in the first place as quoted below... emphasis mine.

 
naw,, scroll back to post 18.

I hope they get this fuel thing right, i would like to have better air , who wouldnt.  When its cost prohibitive to a price point that makes no banking sense, thats when i have a problem. 
we have all discussed alternative energies here and one thing they all have in common is "hotter" burning stuff lets off less polution.
I dont think the engine world is moving towards a hotter burning motor though.
Example of using a oil burning stove with forced air using nothing but old motor oil.  It burns so hot the polution is very little generating nearly whitish blue flames.
not sure the public would embrase the heat ranges required to produce true efficiency under thier hoods when they find out thier "normal" temp range is over 600 to 1000degF under thier hoods.
Sounds like "hot" is good for the earth.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TOM Renzo on September 08, 2012, 01:18:20 PM
Quote from: TheFoeYouKnow;397717
But you have to run it richer, which can make up for it's energy density.  I don't want ethanol, not really, I see the good, but I can't look past the bad.  If we get 15% (doubtful as congress just put that idea down) and I need to make fuel system changes, I'll make fuel system changes and not cry, because I'm a big boy and I do what has to be done.


That might be true till the big boys ban old cars by selection. You know decrease the numbers to pass state and or federal emissions!! My state decreases the numbers in HALF. So if for some reason you think you can build around the laws think again. The feds have an anti tampering law well in place for automobiles. So pray tell me how many on this site run CATS. Lets do this lets have a POLL of how many people have tampered cars. I will start


I have tampered cars. Many!!! Now it is your turn???
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Beau on September 08, 2012, 07:26:56 PM
I will tell you this, it is quite a pain the ass to get a vehicle to pass safety inspection here without cats. I had a fiasco with the Mountaineer, had to have some of my sweet-assed exhaust cut off and a cat welded in to pass. But I needed it legal ASAP.

And we don't even have a sniffer out here, but the cats do have to be there since they were factory...
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Crazy88 on September 08, 2012, 07:32:25 PM
High flow cats don't hurt anything at all on the street.  Racing, on the other hand, is a different matter.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TOM Renzo on September 08, 2012, 10:50:29 PM
Both are true. As 302 points out he has visual inspection and that is a big one. This is my point. 88 is correct as running a cat normally increases HP to an extent. Mostly all modern Cats at 200-300 Cells do not harm performance one bit. They actually increase HP to a slight degree. Car companies are now running cat only exhausts from the factory!! Either way with a stroke of a pen and bypassing congress as what was just dun . The writing is on the wall if the big boys want our cars GONE. It is simply a stroke of the pen AWAY.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Beau on September 08, 2012, 11:14:52 PM
I can understand and accept mass transit in a a place such as downtown LA, or NYC, in fact, in the really crowded places, it's either cab, bus, sub, or hoof it to where ya gotta get to.

But what about the truckers? Take those semis off the road, and we will starve. Well, the folks who can't kill game, bake bread, and live off the land will go hungry, anyway.

Things are and will continue to change, but if you legislate out the semi trucks, the big farm tractors, and the like, we may as well all go jump in a lake with bricks strapped to our boots, because this country won't survive without the trucking industry OR the farmers.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: shame302 on September 09, 2012, 12:34:37 AM
Quote
But what about the truckers?
Semi and diesel have never been held to the strict standards gasoline autos have. Government knows how sensitive that issue is.

FWIW, on any street car, cats are a non issue other than cost and desires sound output. No reason not to have them.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TOM Renzo on September 09, 2012, 06:44:46 AM
NOT TRUE SHAME!!!  They already took care of that with PHASE 4 DIESEL EMISSIONS. Cat is no longer building over the road engines along with others. You see they ran out of emission points 3 years ago. NO ENGINES NO TRUCKS!!!! And most towns and states are implementing clean diesel technology for off road and construction equipment when signing contracts. Either you have PHASE 4 clean diesel equipment and trucks or you do not get to bid the contract. This is well in place in many states already. And it will get worse as time goes on.  So be it as it may the BS is already happening. So when someone claims they will build around the laws they are fooling themselves. SIMPLE you cant drive without license plates!!! Or INSURANCE!!! The TRUCKERS are steamed over high Diesel prices and now add in the cost of UREA. Come NOV better think hard and wise !!!
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Beau on September 09, 2012, 10:39:58 AM
Whatever the outcome in November is, don't believe for a second that the emissions standards will get easier. To buy that is is just silly.

The EPA probably has more to do with that than anything.


For what it's worth (not much, I'll admit) my dad's 2012 Freightshaker has a Cat...his company leased it in April this year. It's the ACERT II version...
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Quietleaf on September 09, 2012, 07:13:51 PM
Of course they want them gone. It does Detroit no good if we're not replacing them every five years. And of course if it's not a Prius then it needs to be crushed to save Mother Gaia. And if our paint has oxidized then it's an eyesore to people who like to lease new vehicles every two years and want the rest of the world to be as pretty as their new car. And then there are people who think we are strange for not being up to our eyeballs in debt ("What kind of American are you?" I have actually been asked this).
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Crazy88 on September 09, 2012, 07:37:44 PM
Quote from: Quietleaf;397855
And then there are people who think we are strange for not being up to our eyeballs in debt ("What kind of American are you?" I have actually been asked this).

I am the kind of American that doesn't feel it necessary to stay in debt or operate in crisis mode.  You know, the kind that pays their bills with cash rather than a credit card?  The kind that helps their neighbor or friends when they need it, cause we want to, and not because someone tries to compel us to. You know, the kind of American that our forefather were... if you can't say the same, you gotta ask yourself, are you who you really want to be?
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TOM Renzo on September 09, 2012, 11:06:34 PM
Caterpillar Inc. is entering a strategic alliance with Navistar International and will exit the on-road engine business. The two companies have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to pursue global on-highway truck business opportunities and cooperate on a variety of engine platforms. The two companies intend to focus on global truck opportunities, including North American severe service construction trucks, as well as technology development for engines worldwide.

Through this alliance, Caterpillar plans to target a 2010 introduction of a North American Cat branded heavy-duty truck. Concurrent with this new strategic direction, Caterpillar has determined independently that it will not supply EPA 2010 compliant engines to truck and other on-highway original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Haystack on September 10, 2012, 04:25:48 AM
Ethonal is the equivilent of watering down gas. Even if it does burn hotter, you have to use the equivilent of twice as much for the same amount of energy. It also like much higher compression to burn as efficiently as gas. The average car is going to get worse gas mileage and use more gas.

Also, every car I have ever had had cats put in, even after hollowing them out when they got clogged, I did replace them, even if it wasn't right away.

The cafe is just a tax that is going to be passed on to those of us that choose to drive newer cars. Instead of putting the blame on the manufacturers, it will be passed onto us. Then those of us that drive older cars will be forced to pay even more for gas because the oil companies will raise the price to keep there profits the same.

Your screwed either way. This is why "local" gas stations are forced out of business. If one gas station lower s the price of gas, then there will no longer be a monopoly on gas prices. Signing a no-compete clause and standardiing the price of gas has forced us into the $4 a gallon range, and it will only keep going up.

It only took one country to drop out of opec for several weeks to bring it down into the sub $3 a gallon range. Goverment protects the rich, as does the legal system. Competetors are either bought out, or ran out like walmart and all of our now defunt mom and pop shops.

Its just another way to control the flow of money, and keep the rich rich, and the poor poor.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Crazy88 on September 10, 2012, 10:58:33 AM
Its called business, not welfare.  Companies MUST make a profit to stay in business and for the record, Gasoline prices are derived by the cost of oil on the open market, which is something that oil companies do NOT control.  Mom & Pop's have been forced out of business by giants like walmart through competition, just like it supposed to work.  Any business that cannot compete with its competitors, SHOULD go out of business.  Change and adapt or die, this is nothing new.  What stopped the mom and pops from expanding thier businesses before  walmart became the behemoth that it did? Are there lessons to be learned from that scenario, as a mom & pop business, you betcha... and if they are incapable of learning, then they deserve their fate.  Eventually, some other competitor is going to take walmarts place at the top of the heap and the cycle will continue.  Don't believe me, have a look at Sears & Robuck, Macy's or Gimball's.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: shame302 on September 10, 2012, 12:37:18 PM
Quote from: Crazy88;397909
Its called business, not welfare.  Companies MUST make a profit to stay in business
Unless you're GM, or Chrysler, or big banking.

Quote
Mom & Pop's have been forced out of business by giants like walmart through competition, just like it supposed to work.  Any business that cannot compete with its competitors, SHOULD go out of business.

Business without ethics. Capitalism works on a leval playing field. Unfortunately it isn't one.

 
Quote
Change and adapt or die, this is nothing new.  What stopped the mom and pops from expanding thier businesses before  walmart became the behemoth that it did? Are there lessons to be learned from that scenario, as a mom & pop business, you betcha... and if they are incapable of learning, then they deserve their fate.

The internet, cheap overseas labor and the selfish American who wants everything for nothing.

It's business without ethics. UPR is a perfect example.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: shame302 on September 10, 2012, 12:44:30 PM
Quote from: TOM Renzo;397799
NOT TRUE SHAME!!!  They already took care of that with PHASE 4 DIESEL EMISSIONS. Cat is no longer building over the road engines along with others. You see they ran out of emission points 3 years ago. NO ENGINES NO TRUCKS!!!! And most towns and states are implementing clean diesel technology for off road and construction equipment when signing contracts. Either you have PHASE 4 clean diesel equipment and trucks or you do not get to bid the contract. This is well in place in many states already. And it will get worse as time goes on.  So be it as it may the BS is already happening. So when someone claims they will build around the laws they are fooling themselves. SIMPLE you cant drive without license plates!!! Or INSURANCE!!! The TRUCKERS are steamed over high Diesel prices and now add in the cost of UREA. Come NOV better think hard and wise !!!

Another example of the little guy paying the price.

 It's regretful to see a company like CAT pull back. The government has already cost them millions due to the health care nonsense. Like I said, the trucking network is pretty darn important component of the fragile economy.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Crazy88 on September 10, 2012, 01:00:14 PM
Quote from: shame302;397910
Unless you're GM, or Chrysler, or big banking.
I could not agree with you more strongly.  Every one of those companies SHOULD have gone out of business.  Would doing so have hurt those employees caught with their pants down,  without a doubt, but it would have been a lesson in life that they would not soon forget.  In the future, they would have found ways to cut out the things they wanted and do the best they could with the limited resources at their disposal.  Those that lived through the "great depression" learned that same lesson, but somehow failed to pass those lessons on to their children and grandchildren and..... here we are.

Quote from: shame302;397910
Business without ethics. Capitalism works on a leval playing field. Unfortunately it isn't one.
Capitalism depends upon the playing field being unlevel.  You build a better product, sell for a cheaper price, provide better service, etc.  None of those things unethical business practices. Graft, kickbacks and corruption are all unethical, but can you cite a single instance of that with regard to walmart?  Yes they undercut the prices of those mom & Pop stores using cheap merchandise made in China, but they could not do so if Americans were not so hellbent on buying the cheapest stuff, now could they. I will admit that things have changed within walmart since ol' Sam died, a man I knew personally...and his huntin' dogs. Back when he was alive, walmart grew because he sold American merchandise at a cheaper price by buying in bulk or buying lots of stuff that distributors had left over, much as he had done when he operated his Ben Franklin discount franchise... but that is not unethical behavior. 

Quote from: shame302;397910
The internet, cheap overseas labor and the selfish American who wants everything for nothing.

Walmart became a major force in the retail market long before the advent of the internet, cheap overseas labor... but he did capitalize on the last attribute you mentioned...but that is simply human nature and has been around for thousands of years.  Everyone wants to obtain what they need or want at the cheapest prices, including those that that can most afford to ignore the price tag.

Quote from: shame302;397910
UPR is a perfect example.
I have no experience with that company, but you obviously have.  Tell me about your experience... I will be happy to listen and maybe even learn something.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: jcassity on September 10, 2012, 02:08:15 PM
Quote from: shame302;397911
Another example of the little guy paying the price.

 It's regretful to see a company like CAT pull back. The government has already cost them millions due to the health care nonsense. Like I said, the trucking network is pretty darn important component of the fragile economy.

 
you'll know when the economy is back when you are back to complaining about all those darn trucks on the highway.  its spooky to remember 10 years ago going down the interstate at 2am and see nothing but the once in a while passanger car surrounded by big rigs.

now its the other way around, i regret complaining now because without truckers moving stuff, that must mean that stuff must not be moving.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: jcassity on September 10, 2012, 02:13:41 PM
Quote from: Crazy88;397912
a man I knew personally...and his huntin' dogs. .

wow, you actually knew him,,, thats very neat.
Do you think he would agree with the way Wal-Mart is handled today?
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Crazy88 on September 10, 2012, 02:29:14 PM
Quote from: jcassity;397919
Do you think he would agree with the way Wal-Mart is handled today?
My guess would be no, not because they have been aggressive competitors, but because walmart sells mostly  made in China, Mexico and other low labor cost countries. But again, walmart could not do that, if... if Americans didn't demand cheap plentiful products.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: shame302 on September 10, 2012, 06:25:11 PM
Quote from: Crazy88;397912

I have no experience with that company, but you obviously have.  Tell me about your experience... I will be happy to listen and maybe even learn something.

Google search them. People don't call them "Unauthorized Product Reproduction" for no reason.

This company is notorious of buying products on the market (mainly Mustang and car related) literally reverse engineering/cloning them and bringing them to market as their own. Part of the problem is that people do not know about their practices, and others just don't care. This company is out of Florida btw. They have many adds in the magazines and web forums.

Quote
Capitalism depends upon the playing field being unlevel.  You build a  better product, sell for a cheaper price, provide better service, etc.  None of those things unethical business practices.
Yes and no. If both are American start ups, is it technically unethical if one lays of it's workers and ships manufacturing to China? Technically, probably not but It's a shiznitty thing to do. I'm not sure if theirs any way to control that either. These people, will end up working a line in walmart, scanning products they used to make for customers who want to save a buck. That is, if they aren't paying with an EBT card but that's a horse of a different color.

In regards to walmart, I agree with you. Like I said, people want everything as cheap as possible. These days quality seems to not matter as much. I don't blame walmart for using cheap parts made by cheap, likely unethical labor. I blame China for that. Companies and workers on our soil simply can not compete with that. That's why as a nation that used to take pride in making stuff, hardly makes anything. Manufacturing has all been moved to mexico, china etc. We did it to ourselves and it's a  shame. While everybody wants so much for their dollar, they want high pay for entry level jobs. On the other side we have companies like GM that allow their unions to become too powerful, vastly overpaying for line work, no undoubtedly part of the reasons for GMs continued failure. When I speak of a level playing field,capitalism should have played out here without government intervention. Would people have lost jobs? Yes. Would the market have corrected itself? Yes. The unemployment would have been far less than the billions bestowed upon them.

When I speak of unethical capitalism, I speak of these jobs being taken out of the hands of Americans and shipped overseas. I believe in capitalism, I do. When I say level playing field, I mean within our borders. Outside of these borders, is an entirely different set of rules. No EPA, pennies on the dollar labor, little or no regard to safety and regulations etc... This is why "apple" has a high turnover and suicide rate within overseas manufacturing. Perhapse that's why an I-phone isn't $1500 either. Maybe that's the wrong idea and capitalism should run completely free internationally. I dunno. All look at all the factories closing or moving out of the country only to leave workers with nothing. We used to have a thriving furniture making community here locally. They are all gone. It's a shame.

Quote from: Crazy88;397923
My guess would be no, not because they have been  aggressive competitors, but because walmart sells mostly  made in  China, Mexico and other low labor cost countries. But again, walmart  could not do that, if... if Americans didn't demand cheap plentiful  products.
No doubt. Everybody is guilty of it.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: TOM Renzo on September 10, 2012, 08:03:34 PM
Now you got it SHAME 302 They do not give a F%^& who they hurt and they prove it every day with BS like this. The Cat engines were the flag ship engine of over the road rigs. Now they are GONE FOREVER. What a crime. Very very disturbing at best.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Beau on September 10, 2012, 08:20:50 PM
Tom, I can assure you Cat is alive and well. Want pics of my dad's truck with the hood up?
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Beau on September 10, 2012, 08:25:07 PM
Well, I just called my dad, he informed me that his truck does NOT have a Cat, but rather a cummins. (His 2010 Peterbilt had the Cat).
But...I did wikipedia and google Caterpillar, they ARE in business and making engines, just not for OTR trucks. So we're both...right, in a way. ;)
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Haystack on September 10, 2012, 09:07:51 PM
The real problem with large companies and monopolies are where the money goes. There are large local "mom and pop" shops here, and many have been very sucessful. To make an honest buck with out 8 year old chinese labor is a lot more work then with it. Then you have to do stupid things like pay health insurance, minimum wage and mantain acceptable working conditions.

The people that employ local, americans, pump money into our economy and spread the wealth from the ground level. The people that employ overseas pocket the profit, and generally do not pass the savings on. They target specific companies and products one at a time until the americans lose their job, then put it into their pocket.

There was a gas station here called gas saver for about 50 years. Just a couple or years ago, they started regulating the underground tank storages with rediculous requirements. First it had to be within 50 feet of the gas pump, then it had to be 100 feet away from the building. Then when the gas station bought out a vcant lot next door, they changed the thickness of the tank.

They just passed laws and spesifications and required them to constantly replace their tanks, rebuild their building, more their location, until they ran out of money. Then when they gave up, a chevron bought it out and knocked down the building and rebuilt an almost identical floor plan and tanks to the origional cash saver. After it went out of business, so did the laws. Now gas is 40 cents a gallon higher for about 2 square miles.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Beau on September 11, 2012, 01:12:35 AM
We and our immediate predecessors are the ones who started this capitalist-till-we're-dead shiznit, now we pay 3 bucks and more a gallon for gas. And bitch and moan. And nothing changes. And nothing ever will. Obama, Romney, or some hash-slinger 24 years from now, the economy is FUBAR, and no one person has the magic pill that will save America. One of the reasons GM (and Chrysler) were bailed out? To keep Americans in jobs, and to support the economy. Sure, let GM fall. Not like there's already too many unemployed because of ignorant, fat cat businessmen who make 5 mil a year and couldn't care any less what people like me, making 30K a year and less say, think, or do.

But here's the kicker...middle class America is the biggest percentage of the population. Why are we not in control?
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: shame302 on September 11, 2012, 01:29:39 AM
Quote from: ThunderbirdSport302;397993
We and our immediate predecessors are the ones who started this capitalist-till-we're-dead shiznit,
Yep.

Quote
And nothing ever will. Obama, Romney, or some hash-slinger 24 years from now, the economy is FUBAR, and no one person has the magic pill that will save America.
It's pretty much a mathematical certainty that, fiscally speaking, no fix exists. I think 24 years before a collapse would be optimistic. I fully expect it within my lifetime. I don't expect a revolution like many do. Never again will the people battle the government in a violent revolution. History would just repeat itself with uber conservatism and uber liberalism dividing the country. At least we know the left leaning liberals don't have the guns :hick: With a complete economic collapse I predict most of those liberals will find themselves much more right leaning. What the country needs is a reset button. The USA has peaked, just like Rome and it's going to fall, just like Rome.

Think about it. the National debt surpassed 16 trillion recently with a budget (did Obama pass one?) of 1.2 trillion. It surpassed the national economy in 2011 and is already 104% of GDP. Nobody in history has ever amassed debt within this magnitude. Numbers like this get thrown around all the time so we're used to hearing them but what do they mean? Keep in mind, we are a nation of only 315 million people. With that said, Consider this:

Conceptualizing large numbers. How much is one Trillion?
 
    One thousand seconds is 16 minutes.
 
    One million seconds is 11 days.
 
    One billion seconds is 32 years.
 
    One trillion seconds is 32,000 years.

The national debt, is 16 trillion dollars or, 512,000 years worth of seconds.

What's it look like?  http://demonocracy.info/infographics/usa/us_debt/us_debt.html
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: jcassity on September 11, 2012, 01:51:43 PM
Quote from: ThunderbirdSport302;397993
people like me, making 30K a year

you make too much money and you should pay your fair share to someone who wants it,, anyone will do just make sure you stop being so greedy with all that big money your making and share it right now.  : )
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: jcassity on September 11, 2012, 01:56:13 PM
Quote from: shame302;397995
Yep.

 The USA has peaked, just like Rome and it's going to fall, just like Rome.


no we wont

there is a magical fix, there always is.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: shame302 on September 11, 2012, 03:54:05 PM
Quote from: jcassity;398017
no we wont

there is a magical fix, there always is.
Well, it's nice to see some optimism.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Crazy88 on September 11, 2012, 05:36:03 PM
Quote from: jcassity;398017
...there is a magical fix, there always is.

There is no "magic fix".  To correct the fiscal tsunami coming our way, there is going to be pain and suffering.  There is going to be death and destruction and there is going to be weeping and "gnashing of teeth".  There is no one size fits all magic formula that alleviates the problems without any discomfort whatsoever.  Anyone that that truly believes that needs to have their head examined. We, and I am using the collective national "we", have to top spending. PERIOD. End Of File.

National defense is a primary, authorized activity, but it can be judiciously cut back.  We are not the worlds policemen and trying to fulfill such a role puts our young men and women in harms way for no national interest and is patently unfair to be burdening these warriors with a mission that is counter to their training, purpose and common sense. We nee to upgrade weapons and systems, replacing worn out and antiquated equipment as necessary.  To accomplish this goal, we should be spending money on research and development with one goal, to keep our young men and women better protected and keep them alive longer.

We can't afford, nor should we try, to extract ANYONE from poverty by TAKING from those that work, only to GIVE it to those that don't.  Notice I used the word "don't" instead of "can't".  This is no accident, because there is a huge difference between someone that can't work due a physical or mental limitation and someone who doesn't work because of . I hear plenty of people who tell me, I can't work because I hurt my back... well, your ears and mouth seem to work just fine, how about answering a phone for a living, there are plenty of people doing just that who don't have physical challenges to overcome. We all know of famous people like Steven Hawking who, it can be argued, contributed greatly to society and perhaps even the world, in spite of their physical limitations, but there are millions more that have similar challenges that support themselves on  daily basis, making a living, paying taxes and having families... all without being a financial burden on their neighbors.

We have allowed this mess to continue over the last 100 years.  It is our fault, it is also our responsibility to do everything in our power to recover from these well meaning, but short sighted programs, which have done nothing but slowly bleed our fellow countrymen dry and make them slaves to the government, perhaps more specifically to those who believe that they are smarter than we are and want to tell us how to live, from our first to last breath... assuming we are allowed to take the first breath at all.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: jcassity on September 11, 2012, 10:02:10 PM
your saying what i say, just figure out a way to do it and not drag yourself down.  when it comes time for me to step up i will look to my side and there you will be,, there are plenty of people out there who think like you, but in order to keep moral up, doom and gloom isnt a good pep talk method.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Beau on September 11, 2012, 10:42:30 PM
Doom and gloom was my method of operation for years. Met Nicole, had kids, got clean and sober for good between meeting her and the birth of our son. That went a long way in boosting my confidence and expelling the darkness and burden that I'd been packing. January 20, 2008 I didn't have shiznit to my name, other than some debts and a junk Tbird. In exactly one year I had an awesome job, a son, a fiance, and hope that I'd not had in years. And I did it all on my by god own.

I never had a  12 step program, but rather seeing what I had as a role model and wanting so much more than that for my own kids made me stop the liquor and the pills. I'm happier now, and I still don't give a  what the rest of the world thinks of me, nor I of it. I'll take care of myself and mine, and I'll help out those in need, but if you just sit around in laziness, then eff you, and GTFO of my way. As it was put very recently..there is a huge difference between "can't" and "won't".

I expect no less and no more from our leaders today. Sadly, my expectations on that aren't exactly met.

What I'm trying to say is basically in agreement with the last 2 posters: if you sit on your ass, then don't get mad when someone else comes along, kicks you outta the way and accomplishes some goals. Live and let live, piss on the rest, but I'll be ed if I ever take handouts.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: shame302 on September 12, 2012, 12:50:49 AM
Quote from: jcassity;398056
your saying what i say, just figure out a way to do it and not drag yourself down.  when it comes time for me to step up i will look to my side and there you will be,, there are plenty of people out there who think like you, but in order to keep moral up, doom and gloom isnt a good pep talk method.

I agree however, sometimes it's difficult to keep a positive spin:

X
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Crazy88 on September 12, 2012, 01:05:40 AM
Quote from: jcassity;398056
... but in order to keep moral up, doom and gloom isnt a good pep talk method.

In the first place, what I was saying was the unadulterated truth.  It is not my intention or desire to put a happy face on a serious problem or blow smoke up someones behind just to make them feel better or in the name of "good" morale.  Such practices are for the devious and brain damaged.  They are short term sweetness to cover for long term damage and destruction. That is like someone saying, "yeah, I am gonna kill you, but I am gonna tell you a joke first..."or maybe someone saying to their children, sure we can go to Disneyland next week, but you just won't get to eat for the rest of the year.  Real morale can be obtained by telling people the truth, even when they don't want to hear it, and then taking every action necessary to lead them out of the swamp in which we find ourselves, reporting accurate progress along the way.  People will see the light at the end of the tunnel and know that whatever pain they may be feeling, will eventually end and free their children and Grandchildren from suffering in a similar way.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Big B on September 12, 2012, 03:56:26 PM
Quote from: Crazy88;398071
In the first place, what I was saying was the unadulterated truth.  It is not my intention or desire to put a happy face on a serious problem or blow smoke up someones behind just to make them feel better or in the name of "good" morale.  Such practices are for the devious and brain damaged.  They are short term sweetness to cover for long term damage and destruction.

Exactly. I feel the same way. People tend to sugarcoat things far to much in this country to try and make themselves and others feel better, temporarily. While it's not entirely a bad thing, it has the end effect of making people drift further away from reality, and in turn never really doing anything to change their situation. There are alot of really lazy ass grown-kids out there still from my generation, and the one that came after, that have an extreme attitude of entitlement, expect everything handed to them, and refuse to lift a finger to help themselves. I'm 29 years old, I own my own 1400sq ft house, 6 vehicles, one of them brand new, all fully paid for, and I have NO DEBT whatsoever. I worked my ass off for everything I have. I grew up a lower-middle class kid, nothing has ever been handed to me once in my entire life, if I wanted to make it in life, it was up to me and only me to make it happen, and as a result I have a "hustle" about myself and a drive to succeed that most people don't have. I now feel sorry for the kids who have to grow up without having that instilled into them. They really will have a hard life, and I won't feel sorry for these people whatsoever when they end up being left behind by the people who actually make things happen.
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: jcassity on September 13, 2012, 03:10:34 PM
guys, im not in any mood to sugar coat things, never have been, i just recently as of a couple years ago stopped doing something that i dont exactly know what the word is for it but its called,,,, toning down the politics here to a large degree, skimming the surface here is sometimes acceptable but be assured i have been locked down more than my fair share for breaking the rules.  I tried to clean up my act on this stuff because at the end of the day, your not alone so why build a water tower of politics here when theres plenty of "real" faces around you that have the same views.  Just a thought.... just so a thread doesnt get in trouble for this stuff. .. its kinda embarrasing and frankly its obvious we are crossing lines that shouldnt be.  Riding the edge can be fun, but thats kinda disrespectful to the good guys letting this thing go on as long as it has dontcha think?
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: Beau on September 13, 2012, 09:35:42 PM
Agreed ^.

Without scrolling back, I couldn't even tell you what the OP's topic was at this point, anyway. I'm out. :)
Title: Someone lost their mind on this one!!
Post by: EricCoolCats on September 13, 2012, 10:05:06 PM
We're done here...