Fox T-Bird/Cougar Forums

Technical => Engine Tech => Topic started by: StrokerBird on April 02, 2012, 04:40:37 PM

Title: 2.3 question
Post by: StrokerBird on April 02, 2012, 04:40:37 PM
Is there a difference between the 2.3 in the ranger vs. the turbocoupe? Aside from the turbo. Better put that out there before my balls get busted to bad :punchballs:
Title: 2.3 question
Post by: T-BirdX3 on April 02, 2012, 05:11:07 PM
Yes.
Title: 2.3 question
Post by: StrokerBird on April 02, 2012, 08:34:30 PM
So first off thanks for the reply. Guess I should've asked what the differences are. Since I didn't find squat when searching.
Title: 2.3 question
Post by: Shadow on April 02, 2012, 08:43:45 PM
2.3T bottom end is forged, blocks are stronger, heads are different etc etc.. it's like comparing an SC3.8 to the NA3.8
Title: 2.3 question
Post by: jangus on April 02, 2012, 09:02:30 PM
Only different part in the bottom end is the piston, which is a low compression forged unit in the turbo motors. Cranks and rods are identical. Personally, IMHO, the stronger block thing is a myth. Heads use a different exhuast valve, and an open chamber, versus the closed chamber in the N/A unit. With slight modification to the chamber to increase volume, the N/A head can be used on the turbo motor. No strength difference between the two.
Title: 2.3 question
Post by: lakenheath24 on April 10, 2012, 01:01:47 AM
dont forget the oil drain hole in the turbo block.
Title: 2.3 question
Post by: turbotrav on April 10, 2012, 08:57:05 AM
Ford did very little to the 2.3 to make it turbo.....its kinda cool how little they did and how tough the engine is.

Travis