Wonder if this is real? lmao (http://"http://miami.craigslist.org/mdc/mis/1539838256.html")
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: Beau on January 08, 2010, 04:11:19 AM
And here's what it says (for when the ad gets flagged, deleted, etc etc..) -(BTW, gotta love the very last line) ;)
To the Thug Latino Guy With the Dumb Looking Mustache Who Tried to Mug Me in Downtown Miami night before last:
I can only hope that you somehow come across this rather important message.
I was the guy wearing the black Burberry jacket that you demanded that I hand over, shortly after you pulled the knife on me and my girlfriend, threatening our lives. You also asked for my girlfriend's purse and earrings.
First, I'd like to apologize for your embarrassment; I didn't expect you to actually in your pants when I drew my pistol after you took my jacket. The evening was not that cold, and I was wearing the jacket for a reason. My girlfriend had just bought me that Kimber Model 1911 .45 ACP pistol for my birthday, and we had picked up a shoulder holster for it that very evening. Obviously you agree that it is a very intimidating weapon when pointed at your head ... Isn't it?!
I know it probably wasn't fun walking back to wherever you'd come from with that brown sludge in your pants.. I'm sure it was even worse walking bare-footed since I made you leave your shoes, cell phone, and wallet with me. [That prevented you from calling or running to your buddies to come help mug us again].
After I called your "Mami" as you had her listed in your cell, I explained the entire episode of what you'd done. Then I went and filled up my gas tank as well as those of four other people in the gas station, -- on your credit card. The guy with the big motor home took 150 gallons and was extremely grateful! I gave your shoes to a homeless guy outside Vagabond, along with all the cash in your wallet. [That made his day!] I then threw your wallet into the big pink "pimp mobile" that was parked at the curb ... After I broke the windshield and side window and keyed the entire driver's side of the car. Later, I called a bunch of phone shag numbers from your cell phone. The phone company just now shut down the line, although I only used the phone for a little over a day now, so what 's going on with that? Earlier, I managed to get in two threatening phone calls to the DA's office and one to the FBI, while mentioning President Obama as my possible target. The FBI guy seemed really intense and we had a nice long chat (I guess while he traced your number etc.).
In a way, perhaps I should apologize for not killing you ... But I feel this type of retribution is a far more appropriate punishment for your threatened crime. I wish you well as you try to sort through some of these rather immediate pressing issues, and can only hope that you have the opportunity to reflect upon, and perhaps reconsider, the career path you've chosen to pursue in life and the kind of that you put other people through every day.
Remember, next time you might not be so lucky.Have a good day! Thoughtfully yours, Alex
P.S. Remember this motto ... An armed society makes a civil society!
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: V8Demon on January 08, 2010, 05:02:40 AM
That's a load of hogwash....
The last line is something a gun advocate would type. A gun advocate trying to keep things legal would not commit the numerous crimes after the alleged incident IMHO.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: ProTouring442 on January 08, 2010, 05:34:02 AM
Yeah, it's a bunch of BS. According to Snopes:
"This piece has been passed along in e-mail since at least mid-January 2009, generally reported as having been harvested from Craigslist, a forum for local classified ads and discussions in more than 550 cities. The earliest e-mailed versions stated the "Craigslist" post had subsequently been removed by that entity and thus was no longer available for examination.
The lack of identifying detail makes it difficult to identify the original author of the piece (or determine whether the narrative was mere fiction or something based on a real-life incident), even more so as several different cities have been named as the location of the felonious interaction, including:
* Savannah, Georgia * Asheville, North Carolina * Las Vegas, Nevada * Dallas, Texas * Austin, Texas * Knoxville (likely Tennessee, but state unspecified) * Georgetown (state unspecified) * Glasgow, Scotland (Glasgow Central Station)" (Source: http://www.snopes.com/crime/justice/mugger.asp)
Happy New Year! Bill
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: vinnietbird on January 08, 2010, 06:51:33 AM
I say B.S.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: oldraven on January 08, 2010, 11:33:40 AM
Quote
An armed society makes a civil society!
Funny, I always thought a civil society was one where people didn't pull knives and guns on each other. Silly, I know.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: baxo on January 08, 2010, 12:03:14 PM
At first I was thinking "holy shiznit this is good", then I realized what girl would buy a gun for their boyfriend for xmas. I figured ok well it IS the states so maybe it's not that far fetched. But the part about the FBI, yeah I'd like to see someone try to attempt a call like that in real life even as a joke and see what happens to them. But it lost me at the P.S. part, that definitely is some NRA brainwash BS.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: 5.0 tbird on January 08, 2010, 12:21:39 PM
+1, some of the less criminal ideas have some promise though. :hick:
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: V8Demon on January 08, 2010, 12:27:05 PM
Quote
I realized what girl would buy a gun for their boyfriend for xmas.
My wife would. That way her boyfriend and her could live on the life insurance policy :hick:
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: ProTouring442 on January 08, 2010, 01:37:12 PM
Quote from: oldraven;305539
Funny, I always thought a civil society was one where people didn't pull knives and guns on each other. Silly, I know.
Someone who accosts you has by the very nature of their crime breached the common laws of society and decency. Therefore, it is not incumbent on you to attempt to act civilly in the face of mortal danger, but rather it is up to you to decide whether or not their plans will go smoothly for them.
You can choose to appease them and in doing so you will condemn their next intended victim to the same ill treatment they intend to inflict upon you, or you can stand and fight even though the odds may be against you. If you fight, it is not only in your best interest to be as prepared as you possibly can be, but it is also in the best interest of any victim that might come after you if you were to fail in your fight.
Yes, you may indeed need to take the life of your attacker, but it is not you who decided that such rules were to be broken. Instead, it was your attacker who made this decision, and who must then be the receiver of all the consequences of his actions, intended or not.
Happy New Year! Bill
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: jrad235 on January 08, 2010, 02:10:00 PM
Yeah, there are variations of that story floating around. The one I read changed some of the details and at the end said, "sorry about that brown streak, respond with what detergent you used and how much and I'll reimburse you..."
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: oldraven on January 08, 2010, 02:29:05 PM
Quote from: ProTouring442;305550
Someone who accosts you has by the very nature of their crime breached the common laws of society and decency. Therefore, it is not incumbent on you to attempt to act civilly in the face of mortal danger, but rather it is up to you to decide whether or not their plans will go smoothly for them.
You can choose to appease them and in doing so you will condemn their next intended victim to the same ill treatment they intend to inflict upon you, or you can stand and fight even though the odds may be against you. If you fight, it is not only in your best interest to be as prepared as you possibly can be, but it is also in the best interest of any victim that might come after you if you were to fail in your fight.
Yes, you may indeed need to take the life of your attacker, but it is not you who decided that such rules were to be broken. Instead, it was your attacker who made this decision, and who must then be the receiver of all the consequences of his actions, intended or not.
Happy New Year! Bill
Yeah, whatever, man. Happy New Year.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: 50tbrd88 on January 08, 2010, 03:09:35 PM
Its obviously fake...but wouldn't it be awesome if it were true?
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: Beau on January 08, 2010, 03:16:11 PM
I think everyone has a right to self defense...legally.
With that said, I posted this as funny, nothing more. I'm pro-NRA, but that isn't why I posted it lol
Anyway, it would be a total nut bust to the perp if it WERE true ;):rollin:
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: ProTouring442 on January 08, 2010, 03:26:13 PM
Quote from: oldraven;305559
Yeah, whatever, man. Happy New Year.
May you never live to regret that you could have done something to stop the crime that came after the one perpetrated upon yourself.
Happy New Year! Bill
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: ProTouring442 on January 08, 2010, 03:31:24 PM
Quote from: FordTruckFreeek;305564
I think everyone has a right to self defense...legally.
With that said, I posted this as funny, nothing more. I'm pro-NRA, but that isn't why I posted it lol
Anyway, it would be a total nut bust to the perp if it WERE true ;):rollin:
Yes and no.... Though sometimes those kinds of stories are fun, defending yourself isn't really about whooping up on the other guy. Instead, it's about the responsibility we all have for our family, our society, and ourselves.
Anyway, back to the birds and cats!
Happy New Year! Bill
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: V8Demon on January 08, 2010, 03:32:47 PM
Quote
Yes, you may indeed need to take the life of your attacker, but it is not you who decided that such rules were to be broken. Instead, it was your attacker who made this decision, and who must then be the receiver of all the consequences of his actions, intended or not.
Defending one's self is not breaking the rules. All that OTHER stuff afterward....
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: ProTouring442 on January 08, 2010, 03:57:13 PM
Quote from: V8Demon;305568
Defending one's self is not breaking the rules. All that OTHER stuff afterward....
Agreed! Frankly, I think the letter, if it were true, is just plain dumb. Fortunately, as the link to Snopes shows, it's bunk.
What I meant was in response to the idea posted by oldraven that people do not pull guns and knives on EACH OTHER in a civil society. In a civil society, he is correct, but when one member breaches the rules of civility, then the one on whom the gun or knife was pulled, or on whom the assault was initiated, must then deal with the new reality of no longer operating within civil society for the duration of the attack. It was not the victim who chose to breach the base level of civility, but rather the attacker.
Happy New Year! Bill
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: oldraven on January 08, 2010, 08:02:37 PM
Quote from: ProTouring442;305566
May you never live to regret that you could have done something to stop the crime that came after the one perpetrated upon yourself.
Happy New Year! Bill
I won't. I live in a civil society. :hick: One murder about every decade around here, never by bullet, and killed by a mugger is unheard of. It's usually a result of a brawl. As in, you only need to worry if you go looking for trouble. I would be more valid in worrying about getting eaten by a Coyote or hit by falling rocks.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: ProTouring442 on January 08, 2010, 09:33:35 PM
Quote from: oldraven;305596
I won't. I live in a civil society. :hick: One murder about every decade around here, never by bullet, and killed by a mugger is unheard of. It's usually a result of a brawl. As in, you only need to worry if you go looking for trouble. I would be more valid in worrying about getting eaten by a Coyote or hit by falling rocks.
Sounds like a cool place to visit sometime, as long as it's not too cold.
I can't do cold.
It's usually not too cold here.
It is right now though.
Why hasn't it warmed up here?
Did I mention that it's cold?
Happy New Year! Bill
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: oldraven on January 08, 2010, 09:52:18 PM
It's not so bad here in Nova Scotia. It's a lot colder in places like Michigan and Ohio. It's hovering around the freezing mark this week, which is pretty decent for January. Flurries at night and melts in the day. After living in the nearly permafrost Edmonton, it's downright balmy.
And Happy New Year. :)
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: ProTouring442 on January 09, 2010, 08:45:04 AM
Quote from: oldraven;305617
It's not so bad here in Nova Scotia. It's a lot colder in places like Michigan and Ohio. It's hovering around the freezing mark this week, which is pretty decent for January. Flurries at night and melts in the day. After living in the nearly permafrost Edmonton, it's downright balmy.
And Happy New Year. :)
Sounds like I should visit in the spring or summer then! :) It does however sound like good "book by the fireplace" weather!
That's the kind of weather we're having here in MD right now, but unfortunately I need to read our home for sale. I hope to clear two or three rooms off of the "to do" list today. If I am successful, maybe my wife and I will have dinner by the fire.
Shiny Side Up! Bill
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: oldraven on January 09, 2010, 09:31:16 AM
Well, I've got about two inches sitting on my deck railing this morning. I doubt that will be gone any time soon, since it's still falling.
I like where this thread went. :p
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: shame302 on January 09, 2010, 11:05:55 AM
Quote
Funny, I always thought a civil society was one where people didn't pull knives and guns on each other. Silly, I know.
Silly, and unrealistic. No crime free society exists. Bad people are everywhere.
Quote
I won't. I live in a civil society. :hick: One murder about every decade around here, never by bullet, and killed by a mugger is unheard of. It's usually a result of a brawl. As in, you only need to worry if you go looking for trouble. I would be more valid in worrying about getting eaten by a Coyote or hit by falling rocks.
Wow dude, you always seem to try and make it sound like you live in some magic fairyland where the sun always shines and the people always smile. delusional you are. i think you also have a warped view on crime in the us.
A few thoughts here,
A. i think its wrong to have to "prove" that you need to protect yourself in order to carry. I for one, believe everyone has the right to protect themselves. armed people are citizens, unarmed people are subjects.
B. while you often try to make it sound like you have no crime, you over look the fact that canada generally has more property related crime than the us. i wonder why that is?
C. even around here, when it gets seasonably warm, crime goes up. when its cold, crime goes down. it's colder longer up in canadia. just a theory
i wouldn't wish a violent crime on anyone, and i hope your never put in such a situation. There are more people in the us than canada and 80X more guns so yeah, crime is more likely to happen. Generally initial assaults with a firearm are done with illegally owned guns, same here as it is in canada.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: oldraven on January 09, 2010, 01:19:29 PM
Blah, blah, blah. I'm not going to argue with you guys. I don't carry a gun and I'm happy about it. Live with it. BTW, I don't have a warped view of crime in the US, I have a rational sense of the lack of crime in my home town. I didn't say one word about the US.
On the other hand, it's sad that anyone thinks this story is great, since the guy with the gun ended up MUGGING the guy with the knife. Who's the good guy? It's funny for a second, until you stop and think about it. He held the guy at gun point and took his stuff. What a hero.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: Beau on January 09, 2010, 03:30:54 PM
Errr..uhhh, hold up fellas. This was a joke, and only meant as such.
I don't give 2 shiznits what the crime rate is in Canada, Massachusetts, or Moscow. I'm kinda on the fence on guns, what they mean to me, vs. people who view them as a weapon regardless of intention or purpose.
As far as that goes, we need better enforcement of existing legislation as opposed to more ignorant laws that will do very little to prevent the violence.
Back to topic. I think that the point of the posting was to make a little fun of someone who unexpectedly got what they were intending on giving.
Yeah, the "actions" of the would-be victim are at best unlawful, and worst no better than the "perp"...when did it become a crime to defend oneself?
I knew this would turn into shag-all...I shouldn't have posted it. Thought (vainly) that all would see the humor and know it wasn't legit. More the fool I am. :flame:
Lock it if need be, I'm done with it.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: shame302 on January 09, 2010, 03:51:26 PM
Quote
On the other hand, it's sad that anyone thinks this story is great, since the guy with the gun ended up MUGGING the guy with the knife. Who's the good guy? It's funny for a second, until you stop and think about it. He held the guy at gun point and took his stuff. What a hero.
The sad part is, you really feel this way. The originator of the crime is a scum bag. Apparently you would be pleased with the situation if the "victim" was unarmed, and the knife wielding dousche robbed, him and shanked him. Obviously, the guy took his defense to far and made some bad judgments (assuming any of it is real). Would you feel better if he just told him to go away? Was it justified, well i bet, and hope the thief learned a life lesson. Hadn't he initiated a crime, none of it would have happened. He is lucky to be alive.
Quote
Back to topic. I think that the point of the posting was to make a little fun of someone who unexpectedly got what they were intending on giving.
Yeah, the "actions" of the would-be victim are at best unlawful, and worst no better than the "perp"...when did it become a crime to defend oneself?
The laughable part is mr raven thinks the guy is a victim, and he doesn't think one needs to be able to defend them self.
Dangerous people like him in the states are the ones attacking our rights, and when/if the 2nd goes down they will all fall like dominoes.
I apologize for my involvement in the thread derailing though i doubt you will get that from oldraven.
This could be just as fake as the "email" but hey, s@ happens. Id be interested to see what his thoughts are on this: probably NSFW
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: oldraven on January 09, 2010, 04:57:50 PM
OK. You win.
Sorry FordTruckFreak. I didn't say anything about gun laws either, but if you're not praising guns when someone brings up the topic, you must want them banned all over the world. I also didn't say anything about Canada, I was talking about the area I live in, which doesn't reflect the rest of the nation, or even other provinces. Anyway, Shame, you let me worry about saying what I think, because you obviously don't do a very good job of doing it for me. I didn't say anyone was a victim, or that I thought the guy shouldn't have defended himself, or any of the other words you put in my mouth. What you are doing is what people call 'demonising'. I say something about civil society, you fill in the rest. I still believe civil society is about how people treat each other, not what they point at each other. All you've proved to me is that NRA zealots are insane.
On the other hand, I got to fire my brother's 12 ga. on New Years day. It was my first time pulling the trigger on a shotgun, and I got two out of three skeets. I was pretty proud of that, since of all the times I'd gone hunting, I'd never shot a moving target. I don't own guns, so I just went for the love of the hunt.
I did laugh when I first read it. I just thought about it for a minute. You know where that can get you. ;)
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: ProTouring442 on January 09, 2010, 05:42:27 PM
Quote from: oldraven;305713
OK. You win.
Sorry FordTruckFreak. I didn't say anything about gun laws either, but if you're not praising guns when someone brings up the topic, you must want them banned all over the world. I also didn't say anything about Canada, I was talking about the area I live in, which doesn't reflect the rest of the nation, or even other provinces.
I did laugh when I first read it. I just thought about it for a minute. You know where that can get you. ;)
And I agree with you in that the "turn about is fair play" routine was funny, until the imaginary victim (the whole story is fake and has been around for years and years) then goes on about making threats in the guys name, etc, etc, etc.
My friend, I believe you have handled yourself quite well. I can see how you might have been hesitant to express your views on the subject for the very reasons you've stated here and which have played themselves out in recent posts. It seems that some people are incapable of holding a discussion on any topic without resorting to accusing their "opponent" of holding some sort of extremists view. For that, I apologize.
Shiny Side Up! Bill
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: ProTouring442 on January 09, 2010, 05:47:39 PM
Quote from: shame302;305705
The sad part is, you really feel this way. The originator of the crime is a scum bag. Apparently you would be pleased with the situation if the "victim" was unarmed, and the knife wielding dousche robbed, him and shanked him. Obviously, the guy took his defense to far and made some bad judgments (assuming any of it is real). Would you feel better if he just told him to go away? Was it justified, well i bet, and hope the thief learned a life lesson. Hadn't he initiated a crime, none of it would have happened. He is lucky to be alive.
The laughable part is mr raven thinks the guy is a victim, and he doesn't think one needs to be able to defend them self.
Dangerous people like him in the states are the ones attacking our rights, and when/if the 2nd goes down they will all fall like dominoes.
I apologize for my involvement in the thread derailing though i doubt you will get that from oldraven.
This could be just as fake as the "email" but hey, s@ happens. Id be interested to see what his thoughts are on this: probably NSFW
Criminals are not necessarily scumbags who deserve to be thrown into pits and torn apart by fighting animals. They have however proven themselves to be unworthy of the trust that is given every free citizen and therefore must be incarcerated for some duration until such time as they can again be trusted. In some cases, there is no time when they can safely be released, and they must therefore be incarcerated for the rest of their lives. In either case, this should not be done in a vindictive manner, but rather because they simply must be removed from society in order for society to remain free and open.
If we turn our penal system into some sort of vindication system, we might as well go all the way and build a Colosseum in each state where criminals can fight it out with each other, victims and victims' families giving the thumbs up or down to spare or execute at the end of each battle. We would be no better than the criminals themselves, and perhaps worse.
In a perfect society no one would ever need to be armed, but then again, in a perfect society no one would really care if anyone else were armed. In any case, the purpose of being armed is to protect life and property, and not to one up the criminal or to get some sort of thrill out of turning the tables. To take another human's life, while sometimes necessary, is never an enjoyable aspect of any rational human's life.
I have smoke detectors and fire extinguishers, and I hope like hell that I never have to use them. In our bedroom I have a fire-blanket and a fire extinguisher, and I pray I never have to use the combination. And in a quick action safe I keep a Smith & Wesson .45acp, with a flashlight, all next to my cell phone, and I fervently pray I never need to utilize that combination. I recognize my responsibility to my family and society, but I pray I will never be called upon to exercise it.
Shiny Side Up! Bill
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: oldraven on January 09, 2010, 05:52:26 PM
Thanks man. No harm, no foul.
Peace, love and all that. Hah! (couldn't resist)
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: shame302 on January 09, 2010, 07:51:05 PM
Quote
They have however proven themselves to be unworthy of the trust that is given every free citizen and therefore must be incarcerated for some duration until such time as they can again be trusted.
Yes but we have to recognize that in the moment, it IS a life and death situation. If it were me being held up, i would not be thinking about calling the police, or the criminals incarceration.
Its best said, Hope for the best, plan/prepare for the worst.
Quote
I didn't say anything about gun laws either, but if you're not praising guns when someone brings up the topic, you must want them banned all over the world. I also didn't say anything about Canada, I was talking about the area I live in, which doesn't reflect the rest of the nation, or even other provinces. Anyway, Shame, you let me worry about saying what I think, because you obviously don't do a very good job of doing it for me. I didn't say anyone was a victim, or that I thought the guy shouldn't have defended himself, or any of the other words you put in my mouth. What you are doing is what people call 'demonising'. I say something about civil society, you fill in the rest. I still believe civil society is about how people treat each other, not what they point at each other. All you've proved to me is that NRA zealots are insane.
LOL, well you have in the past displayed your anti gun-views. Perhaps i jumped the gun and got right on the defensive. It's the people that think like you seem to on this subject that frustrate and sometimes anger me.
Of course you think the NRA is insane. You would. People that love guns and support the 2nd amendment must be insane, right? Personally, i think anyone that thinks just because they don't like what other people do, they somehow have the right to infringe on that persons rights, are insane. Now, obviously you don't value constitutional rights as they do not apply to you, but obviously i do...and there is nothing insane, or extreme about that.
It's not demonizing when in fact you have said that you do not believe people should be able to carry fire-arms. You have said that you do not believe people have a need to carry in order to protect them self. You imply that they are both "bad guys" and condemn the victim for retaliating even though no harm was brought to the aggressor. If it were true, was the "fall out childish and excessive?, sure. But he isn't the bad guy here.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: 50tbrd88 on January 09, 2010, 09:46:19 PM
Quote from: ProTouring442;305717
Criminals are not necessarily scumbags who deserve to be thrown into pits and torn apart by fighting animals. They have however proven themselves to be unworthy of the trust that is given every free citizen and therefore must be incarcerated for some duration until such time as they can again be trusted. In some cases, there is no time when they can safely be released, and they must therefore be incarcerated for the rest of their lives. In either case, this should not be done in a vindictive manner, but rather because they simply must be removed from society in order for society to remain free and open.
If we turn our penal system into some sort of vindication system, we might as well go all the way and build a Colosseum in each state where criminals can fight it out with each other, victims and victims' families giving the thumbs up or down to spare or execute at the end of each battle. We would be no better than the criminals themselves, and perhaps worse.
In a perfect society no one would ever need to be armed, but then again, in a perfect society no one would really care if anyone else were armed. In any case, the purpose of being armed is to protect life and property, and not to one up the criminal or to get some sort of thrill out of turning the tables. To take another human's life, while sometimes necessary, is never an enjoyable aspect of any rational human's life.
I have smoke detectors and fire extinguishers, and I hope like hell that I never have to use them. In our bedroom I have a fire-blanket and a fire extinguisher, and I pray I never have to use the combination. And in a quick action safe I keep a Smith & Wesson .45acp, with a flashlight, all next to my cell phone, and I fervently pray I never need to utilize that combination. I recognize my responsibility to my family and society, but I pray I will never be called upon to exercise it.
Shiny Side Up! Bill
Jeez what are you like a political science professor or something! :D
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: ProTouring442 on January 09, 2010, 10:31:04 PM
Quote from: shame302;305721
Yes but we have to recognize that in the moment, it IS a life and death situation. If it were me being held up, i would not be thinking about calling the police, or the criminals incarceration.
Its best said, Hope for the best, plan/prepare for the worst.
Absolutely true. My point however did not concern the confrontation per se, but rather the criminal and whether or not he and his life hold any intrinsic value. I believe that his life does hold intrinsic value and thus the killing of such a person should not be taken lightly or done for vindictive purposes.
This does not mean that I believe that it is wrong to kill him during the confrontation that might ensue his attempted mugging of an armed citizen and their subsequent actions taken in their own defense. As I stated earlier, it was the criminal who breached the minimum level of civility by pursuing the criminal act, and just like any other human being he must deal with the immediate consequences of his actions.
Shiny Side Up! Bill
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: shame302 on January 09, 2010, 10:49:45 PM
I agree totally on that point, however if I'm being targeted and assaulted, his life's intrinsic value is of no concern to me at that point in time. That does not mean i think he should be executed out of spite, or vindication but rather only in self defense. I'll reflect on how badly i feel about it after the threat has been eliminated, if i am in fact the survivor.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: Ductape91 on January 10, 2010, 12:01:43 AM
Quote from: ProTouring442;305717
If we turn our penal system into some sort of vindication system, we might as well go all the way and build a Colosseum in each state where criminals can fight it out with each other, victims and victims' families giving the thumbs up or down to spare or execute at the end of each battle. We would be no better than the criminals themselves, and perhaps worse.
i hate to say it but im totally for this :bowdown: we need some colosseums, now!
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: Haystack on January 10, 2010, 03:26:31 AM
Seriously, thats when you smile and wave and walk away. Just because the guy has a knife dosen't mean your life is in danger. If i were carrying a gun, i would just point that out to the guy. Criminals generally are just like you and me. They just choose to take the easy way out. Regular people could end up in jail for killing someone, or for j walking or not paying a parking ticket. I would not choose to end someones life or humiliate them just because i could and technically get away with it.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: shame302 on January 10, 2010, 12:27:45 PM
Quote
Seriously, thats when you smile and wave and walk away. Just because the guy has a knife dosen't mean your life is in danger.
LOL, It's nice to think you would take the "high road" but a cracked out meth addict likely will not think reasonably, hence him brandishing a knife, and accounting you. What if it was one of those illegally owned, untraceable hand guns he was pointing at you? He may very well be willing to take your life. WTF would you assume otherwise?
Sorry, I'm not like you. I don't think violent criminals should be treated like people. At the very least they deserve to be treated the same way they treat you.
As far as the penal system goes, I vote for bringing chain gangs back and "free" labor. No reason they should be able to spend all day educating themselves, lifting weights, watching TV or whatever else they do all day. They also should lose all civil rights, such as the right to vote.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: oldraven on January 10, 2010, 04:15:22 PM
I have said in fact? Find me one post where I have said, at any time in the past, that people shouldn't be allowed to carry firearms. I didn't say the NRA is insane, I said the NRA zealots are insane. Just like Christian zealots, and Muslim zealots, they're insane. That doesn't mean they all are, just the ones that kind of scare the hell out of you.
I found nothing wrong with retaliating and defending himself and his girlfriend. I didn't like the mugging part. Two wrongs.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: V8Demon on January 10, 2010, 08:54:38 PM
Quote
I found nothing wrong with retaliating and defending himself and his girlfriend..
I think the problem is the fact that some may not have understood that.
Quote
I didn't like the mugging part. Two wrongs
Agreement.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: oldraven on January 11, 2010, 12:14:54 AM
Quote from: V8Demon;305901
I think the problem is the fact that some may not have understood that.
For sure. If people read the words in front of them without drawing any other conclusions, there's a better understanding.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: shame302 on January 11, 2010, 01:02:57 AM
Quote from: oldraven;305867
I found nothing wrong with retaliating and defending himself and his girlfriend. I didn't like the mugging part. Two wrongs.
I understand you have no problem with the guy defending himself. I get the feeling you would weep for the intruder had he been shot dead. Your a sympathizer imo. Who gives a rats ares what happened to the criminal. Would any of that been the right thin to do, NO but he brought it on himself.
Quote from: oldraven;305867
I have said in fact? Find me one post where I have said, at any time in the past, that people shouldn't be allowed to carry firearms.
concealed carry being an issue of yours. you are saying that:
A. id rather it be law that anyone carrying MUST have weapon in question in plain veiw.
B. id rather it be unlawful for anyone to carry a weapon on them.
Quote
And yes, Shame, my pick would be B, for taking the right to carry a concealed weapon, or just a gun in general, around the streets with you. We have that law here, and I honestly have never heard a Canadian complain that they weren't allowed to carry one around to protect themselves on a daily basis.
I just will never get the entire gun culture, when it comes to carrying one with you on a daily basis. It freaks me out to think of it
Do those work for you?
Quote
For sure. If people read the words in front of them without drawing any other conclusions, there's a better understanding.
Tough to not draw conclusions when you read between the lines. Like your first post in this thread, I felt had a agenda. IMHO, that was your passive way of saying guns are icky, and you knew your statement was going to get some traffic.
Quote from: oldraven;305539
Funny, I always thought a civil society was one where people didn't pull knives and guns on each other. Silly, I know.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: Beau on January 11, 2010, 02:02:13 AM
Hmmmm.
Quote from: oldraven;243795
Again, let me say it as clearly as possible. I do not agree with an all out ban on guns. There, no more confusion. Please don't reply and tell me that you still think I do, because I just told you I didn't.
I can read that loud and clear. ;)
One more thing..
Quote from: oldraven;243399
I'm showing support of removing concealed weapons and assault rifles from the hands of average citizens. Civilians.
I've been saying that since I started getting a grasp of the conundrum of gun (mis)control.
Who the shag needs AK-47 or an AR15 to hunt deer with? The caliber of those are way too small to be effective against a dangerous animal, such a Cape Buffalo, or a Grizzly. The military may need them, the average hunter does not. Let alone a civilian looking for a new way to impress his buddies. I can (and will) personally say that an AK is almost useless for anything other than throwing some lead out in front of you. I';ve shot one. Put 50 or 60 rounds through it. Was NOT impressed. Hit the paper twice, what a f*ckin' waste of time. I rest my case, lol.
Now this:
Quote from: oldraven;242856
It's more the idea that you can never tell who's packing. Being on the bus and thinking "There are at least 8 handguns within 12' of me right now."
That I will take issue with. Here in good ole gun-nuts USA, I seriously doubt you'll find 8 legally concealed handguns within 12' of you on a bus...most public transportation doesn't allow cc ;) ( I did say legal, right?) This isn't trickery with words however. I'd be more concerned with the 2 or 3 individuals who are convicted felons who have a gun on 'em illegally. I'll say right here that I really enjoy the privilege of hunting, of owning a gun, and not worrying or feeling guilty over it. But, if I knew I was going somewhere where cc was prohibited, I'd leave it at home (assuming I have a ccw-I don't, but for an example let's assume I do) because I will not jeopardize the freedoms I have and enjoy, by breaking the law carrying concealed where prohibited.
A civil society, you say. I'm all for it, but I'm not giving up my hunting rifles, my shotguns or my handgun.
Civility starts with understanding, compassion, and trust. You could walk into my house most any day and never know there are somewhere between 1 and 14 firearms in here. Unless it's deer season, I may have rifle leaning a corner, then again, maybe not now that I have a son who is VERY exploratory.
You'd have to trust my not holding you at gunpoint over your wallet, or your keys...or...whatever.
Just as I'd have to trust you to not do the same to me at knifepoint.
And finally:
Quote from: oldraven;242798
I just will never get the entire gun culture, when it comes to carrying one with you on a daily basis. It freaks me out to think of it.
Nobody expects you to, well, most probably don't.;) I grew up with a rifle or shotgun leaning in the corner of the kitchen, to me, it's as familiar as the sink in the bathroom. Not everyone is like that though, and understandably would be nervous in that scenario. Some guys spend hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars firing a $10,000 rifle at a piece of paper for fun. Some guys spend about 200 bucks and have good meat for most of a winter. Some guys would rather play golf, or shoot pool, or play Oblivion on the computer, and I'm one of those guys too ;) It's all in your comfort zone, and what you are familiar with.
One thing that may seem pushy though...enroll your children in a firearms safety class...better for them to know how to safely and properly handle a firearm if the need ever arise, than to have a tragedy. For what it's worth, here those classes are mandatory about the 7th or 8th grade. I went to middle school in a large city, and even back then, I was amazed at the naivety of kids my age about gun safety.
I'd held back on posting because I'm not liking where the thread is going...I'm NOT pointing fingers though. We've just gotta realize that we're all different, and should keep that in mind when the thoughts form and the fingers fly, lol. :bowdown: Peace.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: shame302 on January 11, 2010, 03:23:21 AM
Quote
Who the shag needs AK-47 or an AR15 to hunt deer with? The caliber of those are way too small to be effective against a dangerous animal, such a Cape Buffalo, or a Grizzly. The military may need them, the average hunter does not. Let alone a civilian looking for a new way to impress his buddies. I can (and will) personally say that an AK is almost useless for anything other than throwing some lead out in front of you. I';ve shot one. Put 50 or 60 rounds through it. Was NOT impressed. Hit the paper twice, what a f*ckin' waste of time. I rest my case, lol.
No body man and that's not the point. Take the AR15 for example. It's covered under the 2nd amendment weather you have interest, or not. It's an enthusiast gun. There are more lawful uses than hunting, period. The 2nd amendment does not cater to hunters, in fact i doubt it even mentions them which brings up my next point. The first amendment covers freedom of speech. We can reasonably assume that freedom of speech covers ALL current forms of speech such as TV, Radio, Print, Internet, all forms of communication and speech that did not exist then, yet i reiterate, they are still protected.
I'll say this as well, those type of guns are not the ones generally used in crimes. Illegally owned hand guns are.
Your view on guns, IMHO is not a constitutional one.
Quote
It's all in your comfort zone, and what you are familiar with.
That's the thing man, again, IMHO, his view on guns is one based on emotion rather than fact and reason. He is freaked out about the thought of people carrying them. It's unreasonable to think other people shouldn't have the right to carry or C/C just because guns frighten you.
Quote
One thing that may seem pushy though...enroll your children in a firearms safety class...better for them to know how to safely and properly handle a firearm if the need ever arise, than to have a tragedy.
Fantastic point. Gun safety classes are not just for jun owners or those seeking their license or what have you.
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: Beau on January 11, 2010, 03:31:03 AM
Holy shiznit!, I missed this one...
Quote from: baxo;305541
At first I was thinking "holy shiznit this is good", then I realized what girl would buy a gun for their boyfriend for xmas. I figured ok well it IS the states so maybe it's not that far fetched. But the part about the FBI, yeah I'd like to see someone try to attempt a call like that in real life even as a joke and see what happens to them. But it lost me at the P.S. part, that definitely is some NRA brainwash BS.
I know a lot of folks whose wives/girlfriends/sig. others have bought them guns...what of it? Am I to be looked down on if Nicole gets a .45 ACP for me on my birthday? hmm...
"I figured ok well it IS the states" Again, another needless generalization, and one that doesn't say anything in regards to the initial topic. Yeah, we're a very populated nation, with less-strict firearms laws than Canada. Of course your crime rate is gong to be lower. And we also have our fair share of sterotypes about Canucks, so that's fair I reckon, eh?
The FBI remarks...yeah, I agree those are complete bullshiznit lol. Just try making a call like that...we'll see you in Leavenworth soon lol.
I'm NRA, but I don't subscribe to the radical views that if everyone owned a gun the world would be a safer place. Then again, if you want an unlicensed and unregistered handgun, they're easy enough to acquire. My guess is that it's the same way in Canada. Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it isn't there. Perhaps you're in an environment where that's not near you. But the world is bigger than your backyard, and it's not all roses and rainbows. ;)
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: V8Demon on January 11, 2010, 04:06:40 AM
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: EricCoolCats on January 11, 2010, 07:32:46 AM
So the story was proven to be false. Why is everyone still arguing?
Guess we'll have to add the 2nd Amendment to the list of banned subjects....sigh...
:locked:
Title: Poetic Justice, or someone with a good imagination????
Post by: baxo on January 11, 2010, 08:25:33 AM
Wow this totally slipped by me, made one post and forgot about this thread. I had no idea that my slightly comical reply would strike a nerve. Lighten up dude! I wasn't actually serious about what I wrote. I'm sure if I made that comment in real life to you you would have gotten the impression of silliness. Sorry for offending you dude. Eric, thanks for closing the thread.
Maybe that's why americans bear arms, they can't take jokes lightly and think everything's offensive, (joking again! haha).