Print Page - Poor basterized bird

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: dominator on December 31, 2009, 07:52:30 PM

Seen this on ebay,what a hack job.
Street strip car,i think not.
You just could not drive this thing on the street,spool,manual brakes and rack,what was he thinking.
I love the shelving rack holding up the fuel cell,OMG.
And he was gonna put a chev in it,ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Ford-Thunderbird-turbo-coupe-1987-Thunderbird-turbo-coupe-low-reserve_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem4a9d6b68eeQQitemZ320468642030QQptZUSQ5fCarsQ5fTrucks

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: thunderjet302 on December 31, 2009, 08:14:11 PM

:barf:

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: Beau on December 31, 2009, 09:34:43 PM

All that work, time, and money for the rear end, and yet it still has the stock suspension?

Fail.:flame:

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: Romeo2k on December 31, 2009, 09:41:54 PM

:screwy:

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: FLSTCI71 on December 31, 2009, 11:08:37 PM

That's only about 60-70 miles from me. If anyone wants me to check it out for them before they bid, I would be happy to. :rollin:

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: SLEEPER T-BIRD 87 on December 31, 2009, 11:50:45 PM

good start for a race car.

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: gumby on January 01, 2010, 11:09:27 AM

Quote from: dominator;304676

You just could not drive this thing on the street,spool,manual brakes and rack,

meh, i know plenty of guys who drive their weekend cars with manual steering, brakes, and a spool. one of which is a high 9sec 75 camaro on pump gas. weighs more than my TC and drives it every weekend in the summer.

Quote from: SLEEPER T-BIRD 87;304700

good start for a race car.

if the reserve is actually low, i would agree......if you like that kinda racing :hick:

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: bhazard on January 01, 2010, 11:31:26 AM

Manual racks prolly fine with that light front end and skinniest.

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: jandmmustangs on January 01, 2010, 01:55:05 PM

The only time a manual rack sucks is in low speed turns, ie parallel parking. My old 89 GT had a poor man's manual rack (recirc the lines).

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: Thunderbird88 on January 01, 2010, 04:33:14 PM

I just don't see a problem ...
And I dont see the problem with putting a chevy engine in a ford ... Just brand-British cigarettes who hates it ...

I like that car but ofcourse some things I would change!

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: ~AC on January 01, 2010, 08:10:13 PM

thats just ugly. maybe its the yellow. or maybe its that retarded bird catcher that has no purpose. as i was looking at the pictures theres only one that i thought.. not bad. the rims. love that style of rim, but he can keep them, and the car, and burn it to the ground. i know i know dont kill a bird. but that killed that car already. burn it to the gorund after taking the tailights off.

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: V8Demon on January 01, 2010, 09:42:42 PM

Quote from: jandmmustangs;304749

My old 89 GT had a poor man's manual rack (recirc the lines).

A true manual rack will be easier to turn than that ;)

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: TurboCoupe50 on January 01, 2010, 10:13:43 PM

Quote from: SLEEPER T-BIRD 87;304700

good start for a race car.

I agree, but I wouldn't go to Minnesota for it if he was giving it away...

Title: Poor basterized bird
Post by: HAVI on January 01, 2010, 10:37:35 PM

Especially tonight. Hands might get cold touching the chain binders, lol.

Fox T-Bird/Cougar Forums

General => Lounge => Topic started by: dominator on December 31, 2009, 07:52:30 PM