Looks like Ford has brought the badges back on te new 5.0L GTs. Good looking engine too.
http://jalopnik.com/5434086/2011-ford-mustang-gt-the-50-is-back?skyline=true&s=i (http://"http://jalopnik.com/5434086/2011-ford-mustang-gt-the-50-is-back?skyline=true&s=i")
Wow, that thing is sure crammed into that open space. Too bad it still won't have the low, low torque (and its related fuel economy) that made the original 5.0's so great. Of course they have 50 years and a few new tricks underneath it to get some of that back.
ehhh. I don't know if i like it.
Finally, a mustang GT i would actually like to own. Whats not to like about 412 NA HP out of a high revving DOHC 5.0!
:idhitit:
6 forward gears automatic and manual.
I MAY have 2 Mustangs by this time next year.....
I have been reading up on both of the 2011 Mustangs.
A V-6 that makes 305 hp AND 30 MPG with an automatic...WOW
And with the GT @ 412 HP on the motor is super impressive if they can keep the weight down.
Congrats to Ford for now having some ammo for the Pony car war. :D (...or is that clidesdale war....)
If I made a hell of alot more I'd buy one. Valet's don't make much....
I think we will be surprised how much of this they will make up with the variable cam timing. That and greater control over the ignition events will make the fuel economy much better too.
Hopefully I'll be able to afford a nice used 2011 GT when I graduate from chiropractic school in 4 years (I start Jan 12.).
-Rob
Don't you already own a GT? lol
Pretty sure his GT is alot better than a run of the mill Mustang GT.
4.6 DOHC swap IIRC Thats not really a GT anymore if you think about it.
All I know is...I want one.
Where do I sign my soul away? :rollin:
Video (http://www.listangs.com/forum/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=fordvideo1#p/u/1/zlR8hbpkHkw
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=fordvideo1#p/u/0/IwvLEx10KgE
7K always makes me cringe and smile every time. It's creepy and shagy all in one, like a really hot goth chick. I dream of a KB 2011 mustang GT.
Must be nice! I hope the new engine is a success. Part of me expects that once they come out there will be some sort of fail hidden in the new car.
I'm actually kind of curious how they handle variable valve timing on a V8 DOHC engine. Havn't looked into it.
Yup well, I should have been more clear and said, finally a factory mustang gt that i would actually like to own. The rest of them suck stock, though the 2005-2010 stang is very nice, It wouldn't tempt me away from my car. The '11 has that potential, though i like having something a little more personalized.
Stock 96-98 GTs are a joke and 99-04 GTs are....snore-ville. Nothing prior to that interests me either.
Valets in Iowa don't make that much. Try doing your job in Vegas; it's sure to pay more.
God makes me want to sell the 99 and spend another 20 years at sofos. But alas i will wait and go to college when i pay the 99 off.
I call dibs on being the 1st one to put the new style 5.0 badges on their fox T-bird. lol.
On a side note: I guess I will have to wait for some kid to wreck their old 2011 5.0 in the year 2021 and drop that motor into my '07. Sucks for me that mine is 300 hp and now the V6 will eclipse that!!
do we know the bell housing pattern? same traditional 5.0? my diggin around says yes but not sure if i am right.
heres a better view of the new engine (http://cmsimg.freep.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=C4&Date=20091228&Category=BUSINESS01&ArtNo=912280342&Ref=AR&Profile=1002&MaxW=600&MaxW=800&q=50)
Very interesting gear ratios.
Nice.
But we knew it was going to get budget rods and pistons anyway. The previous NA 4.6 rods cost ford around 7 dollars each where as the ones in the terminator were in the 50s. That would add up fast. That, and production numbers will be much higher than the terminator project i assume. The CR is high, but with the wideband the car will have and the new oil spray patten that sprays the underside of the piston, hopefully boost will still be safely manageable.
Sweetness.
Where are my pushrods? ;)
In the trash can where they belong.:poke:
I think so. They aren't cast, that's for sure.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v53/Confed/11Mustang_50L_23_HR.jpg)
So far the thing that i really don't care for is that it looks like it runs a timing belt setup.
Do you honestly think Ford would do that after running a chain belt for so long on the 4.6?
Yes, I wouldn't be surprised at all....
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v53/Confed/ENGINESS.jpg)
ford has really raised the bar, kinda kills my motivation on a pushrod motor anymore
seek, did you get a shot anywhere of the bell housing pattern?
Kinda lame that they would go to a belt like that...
LOLZ, yeah, honda guys will love that.
I hate belts - "100k mile standard lifetime" for most economy cars doesn't mean much when it can get snapped back and forth at huge forces due to the quick torque changes these motors can make. Then again, I don't know what they use for belts now days and it very well could be stronger than affordable chains. Then again, chains also stretch and can go for longer change intervals, causing some nasty timing issues at older ages...not that most people care about a vehicle over 100k miles.
Any idea how much more quickly one of these belts may wear out with a driver that enjoys all their power on a daily basis? Someone here's got to know of some real world tests done by some company somewhere.
I really dont think they are using belts in these engines. come on guys that engine looks like the Z-tec engine... not anywhere close to looking like the new 5.0, I think they were using the pic as an example only. also sealing a belt up with aluminum covers where oil can get to them isnt a good idea. there is most likely a chain in there.
After doing some searching I found that's a photo of Ford's 1.6L motor with TiVCT. The 3.7 has a chain. I would sincerely hope that after all the touting they've done for the rest of the engine; they would not skimp in this department.
More pictures.....
(http://us.tnpv.net/2009/FRD200912/FRD2009122782897_PV.jpg)
(http://us.tnpv.net/2009/FRD200912/FRD2009122783049_PV.jpg)
(http://us.tnpv.net/2009/FRD200912/FRD2009122782658_PV.jpg)
(http://us.tnpv.net/2009/FRD200912/FRD2009122782592_PV.jpg)
(http://us.tnpv.net/2009/FRD200912/FRD2009122782504_PV.jpg)
(http://us.tnpv.net/2009/FRD200912/FRD2009122782628_PV.jpg)
(http://us.tnpv.net/2009/FRD200912/FRD2009122782570_PV.jpg)
(http://us.tnpv.net/2009/FRD200912/FRD2009122782598_PV.jpg)
(http://us.tnpv.net/2009/FRD200912/FRD2009122782451_PV.jpg)
(http://us.tnpv.net/2009/FRD200912/FRD2009122782418_PV.jpg)
(http://us.tnpv.net/2009/FRD200912/FRD2009122782368_PV.jpg)
(http://us.tnpv.net/2009/FRD200912/FRD2009122782335_PV.jpg)
And a close up......
(http://www.carthrottle.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/5.0-3.jpg)
(http://www.carthrottle.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/5.0-4.jpg)
I'm still hoping that its not true, but there IS alot of buzz about it. I wouldn't put it past ford to make such a move but I'm not convinced that the new engine has belts. The chain setup works rather well so why abandon it. I guess im just a little reluctant and I'm expecting "something" to be "up".
Those badges would look sweet on the side of my '83 with new paint lol. That would be the closest I could get to a new 'Stang.
wow, lifter/rocker/valve setup reminds me of the true link system.
It's gotta be a chain drive system. The cam covers extend over the sprockets. They wouldn't do that if it was a belt drive.
They need to make the engine cover say "5.0 HO" ;)
On another note, look how low and tucked in the engine is within the engine bay. [insert]droolies smiley here [/insert]
I actually wish to hell they didn't go to a 5.0. It' just annoying. It'll do however.
gotta save room for the super charger,, cobra
I'm waiting for the day when someone goes to autozone to buy parts for the Mustang 5.0 (be it either a new or a fox) and they get all confused and give them the wrong parts. Because you know that with two entirely different 5.0 motors both in Mustangs, some moron is gonna think that parts will interchange. lol.
Yeah that was annoying...
If anyone has read the new 5.0 magazine it shows that the new 5.0 Mod motor uses a chain and not a belt as mentioned in here. Thank god! I think I need to start saving my pennies. I must have one!
What? The chain, or the car it goes on? ;)
I'll take one as well, if you're buying. Make mine red, please. :D:rollin: