General => Lounge => Topic started by: shame302 on August 07, 2009, 07:07:55 PM
Title: Oh My...
Post by: shame302 on August 07, 2009, 07:07:55 PM
So what do you think ;0)
Quote
"This application provides access to the DoT CARS system. When logged on to the CARS system, your computer is considered a Federal computer system and is the property of the U.S. Government. Any or all uses of this system and all files on this system may be intercepted, monitored, recorded, copied, audited, inspected, and disclosed to authorized CARS, DoT, and law enforcement personnel, as well as authorized officials of other agencies, both domestic and foreign."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqfuZ7hiap0
Title: Oh My...
Post by: t3skidoo on August 07, 2009, 07:23:09 PM
I think someone has been off his meds for too long. That he scored a tv show means either he's not the only one in need of prescription, or he gives great cranium.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Masejoer on August 07, 2009, 08:50:04 PM
This was brought up in the "cash for clunkers plan pulled" thread http://foxtbirdcougarforums.com/showthread.php?t=22576
Anyways, the message could be worded better but just means you have to follow their rules when in their system and blah blah. It's the same stuff we deal with at work when logging in to client' servers. They don't go as far as calling it "property" though. Unless you willingly install things on your computer (just browsing to a website will not do this), they don't touch anything. Don't use IE and any software will never even have a chance to install without manually running an installer. IE "can" automatically install applications if the security settings are set just right and the site is using a code signed applet.
Don't worry about it.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: HAVI on August 07, 2009, 09:25:09 PM
You mean this ain't the you tube dancing wedding party ??
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 07, 2009, 10:02:33 PM
Quote from: t3skidoo;285717
I think someone has been off his meds for too long. That he scored a tv show means either he's not the only one in need of prescription, or he gives great cranium.
Thats an odd response to a well founded point made. Flip everything around to your opinion of an individual and ignore the substance of the converstation.
maybe you want the substance to become a reality,, you want to see america fall,, you crave it happening because somewhere along the way america let you down and now its time to pay everyone back.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 07, 2009, 10:04:33 PM
Quote from: HAVI;285726
You mean this ain't the you tube dancing wedding party ??
serious times we are in unlike any (according to a lot of old folk) and yet we goof off like we dont care.
well,, i do care.
no wonder the rest of the world has our jobs.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 07, 2009, 10:06:45 PM
Quote from: shame302;285716
So what do you think ;0)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqfuZ7hiap0
Nice work keep it talking to people about this stuff, eventually people will come around to common sense and the foundation of our country.
if not, then i hope to die sooner than later rather than give up my freedom my family members fight for everyday, as i have to.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Cougar5.0 on August 07, 2009, 10:21:35 PM
Quote from: t3skidoo;285717
i think someone has been off his meds for too long. That he scored a tv show means either he's not the only one in need of prescription, or he gives great cranium.
+2
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 07, 2009, 10:27:07 PM
amazing how someones shagual bla bla can be a more important thing than the topic.
I suppose thats what is important today, not the important things but the things that drain brain cells.
maybe those with already drained brain cells can get enough traction to understand whats going on around them.
beck is one of those people you might run into on the street, straight talking and a little off his rocker as far as his composure. Looking past that and listening to the substance of him, dobbs, hanity, savage, NPR, WallStreetJournal, USAtoday, and older people, i have to say there is something wrong with the govt addding this to the terms and conditions.
Its not fair and its trickory(sp) and i am sure there is a law that makes it a violation , since it is basically a contract made impossible to get around unless you decline the offer.
Someone who wants to partite in the program based around whatever thier intent is , can not escape the repercutions of the trickory. basically, its entrapment.
however, its the govt and i guess they do whatever they want to do even if it is to you. I look for the govt to make the UCMJ the new law of the land, why not since martial law is almost in place.
So,, whoever wants to report me to the "misinformation czar" recently appointed ,, go ahead. Evidently you wont need my permission to report me to the govt as its voluntary and its confidential. Just remember the terms and conditions on that website as well,,, : )
Title: Oh My...
Post by: HAVI on August 07, 2009, 10:34:10 PM
Well, ok. My wife, who is the County Republican chair, and I, watch the Glenn Beck show every day. The only thing I'll say about the cash for clunkers is this: people who don't have the money are willing to trade in their payed for vehicle to get a new car that will create a big monthly payment, further pushing them behind the recovery. $4500 off the purchase price of a $20,000 vehicle is $15,500 they could have spent on paying off credit cards, gas, and repair bills (keep the mechanics working) and instead they are allowing the car manufacturers to sell a few more cars (are they American cars?) just so the manufacturers can pay back the loan to the Govt. How many cars does the manufacturers have to sell before the lots across the country are bare enough to warrant more car production? I fail to see how the CARS program will work to pull this country out of a recession. Also, I fail to see how this country will recover when the gas prices continue to rise. Supply and demand. But my wife is much better at this than I am, so I leave the debates up to her, and I chime in with a joke to break the ice after she creates such a stunned silence in the air on her liberal adversaries.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Cougar5.0 on August 07, 2009, 10:59:13 PM
lol @ the pols who are just pissed that they didn't think of it first (& opposed it anyway.)
Title: Oh My...
Post by: TurboCoupe50 on August 07, 2009, 11:17:37 PM
And I'm still pissed cause the '93 Grand Marquis doesn't qualify...
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Cougar5.0 on August 07, 2009, 11:33:41 PM
lol. I was wishing I had a clunker in my driveway - alas I got rid of the last of my clunkers a while back. Of course the last one was a Geo that got 38 MPG - lol.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: shame302 on August 08, 2009, 12:04:58 AM
Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by t3skidoo (http://www.foxtbirdcougarforums.com/images/buttons/viewpost.gif) (http://"http://www.foxtbirdcougarforums.com/showthread.php?p=285717#post285717") i think someone has been off his meds for too long. That he scored a tv show means either he's not the only one in need of prescription, or he gives great cranium.
+2
I know, I know...they must have been making it up...but what, what if not? Then how do you feel about it big guy?
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Carl on August 08, 2009, 12:09:33 AM
fox would never report on this sort of thing when bush was in office
Title: Oh My...
Post by: t3skidoo on August 08, 2009, 12:09:34 AM
Quote from: jcassity;285730
Thats an odd response to a well founded point made. Flip everything around to your opinion of an individual and ignore the substance of the converstation.
maybe you want the substance to become a reality,, you want to see america fall,, you crave it happening because somewhere along the way america let you down and now its time to pay everyone back.
The OP asked for opinions without specifying any restrictions, so I gave one.
Here's another: the lighter fluid masquerading as technical-info-spouting-bimbette doesn't know squat about pushing electrons, computers, the interwebs, or gov't policy.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Carl on August 08, 2009, 12:18:47 AM
Quote from: HAVI;285740
Well, ok. My wife, who is the County Republican chair, and I, watch the Glenn Beck show every day. The only thing I'll say about the cash for clunkers is this: people who don't have the money are willing to trade in their payed for vehicle to get a new car that will create a big monthly payment, further pushing them behind the recovery. $4500 off the purchase price of a $20,000 vehicle is $15,500 they could have spent on paying off credit cards, gas, and repair bills (keep the mechanics working) and instead they are allowing the car manufacturers to sell a few more cars (are they American cars?) just so the manufacturers can pay back the loan to the Govt. How many cars does the manufacturers have to sell before the lots across the country are bare enough to warrant more car production? I fail to see how the CARS program will work to pull this country out of a recession. Also, I fail to see how this country will recover when the gas prices continue to rise. Supply and demand. But my wife is much better at this than I am, so I leave the debates up to her, and I chime in with a joke to break the ice after she creates such a stunned silence in the air on her liberal adversaries.
In a central banking system, more debt means more money. More money means more debt. Money is created from debt, so it benefits the big dogs if the little people of the country are still in debt.
Take a look at this video, it explains the banking system better. Skip to 4 mins.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: HAVI on August 08, 2009, 12:36:48 AM
I'll watch the video later when my dsl is fast enough, seems to have issues tonight. But right now I'll say that I have 3 vehicles that qualify, and the wife and I drive two of them as DD's. The third is my yard truck. My current unemployment prevents me from having a car payment, not that I want one anyway. I understand that, but what about those that don't? My Tbird sits without me being able to work on it, and that frustrates me. I have no debt whatsoever besides my mortgage, and that is how I roll. There is no charging a credit card to get the CHE's that I need. :) And the Tbird will sit because of it....frustrating me, lol.
Also, as long as I work for someone else, I will be one of the little people.
Glenn Beck seems extreme at times, but for the most part this country has divided itself between red and blue, which is what was promised not to happen. I try to stay the middle of the road the best I can. It was said that I don't take it seriously, I tried to prove otherwise, that's all.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Cougar5.0 on August 08, 2009, 12:42:53 AM
Just in case anybody thinks we all agree, I have to state that Beck is a babbling psychopath who should be in an asylum.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: shame302 on August 08, 2009, 12:53:34 AM
Quote
Glenn Beck seems extreme at times
So can one of my "guys" Jay Severin BUT, more extreme than who? Current "big guy", I don't think so. I have always though of myself as middle of the road. Until this last election i never voted, never really paid much attention. Wish i did and more often...
Bottom line though, What freaking BUSINESS what so ever has any business having such language in their user agreement? And if people cought wind, who in their right mind (other than the drones with their head down in denial) would aver accept...?
Quote
fox would never report on this sort of thing when bush was in office
Holy shiznit man, it way so totally goes the other way with the current office and general media...good god...who do you think won the election?
Seriously, i DO NOT want another thread locked here...I was very stunned (not really surprised at all actually but dissapointed) when i heard this. I genuinely wanted well rounded opinions on this from a diverse croud. NOT from a "political" site where everyone has an agenda or is hard core left/right....To be either merits a "mental health check". I wanted opinions from average guys that are a little more like me and less like the yuppies........
Title: Oh My...
Post by: HAVI on August 08, 2009, 01:01:34 AM
Politics aside, the verbage used in that agreement was to cover their own ass. Gone are the handshakes that meant something.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Cougar5.0 on August 08, 2009, 01:01:55 AM
Do you have any idea how offensive Beck is to me?
Title: Oh My...
Post by: t3skidoo on August 08, 2009, 01:04:34 AM
Quote from: Cougar5.0;285788
Just in case anybody thinks we all agree, I have to state that Beck is a babbling psychopath who should be in an asylum.
You're too kind. I had something else in mind, involving large hungry carnivores. He'd still have a camera on him, though.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Cougar5.0 on August 08, 2009, 01:08:29 AM
Quote from: t3skidoo;285792
You're too kind. I had something else in mind, involving large hungry carnivores. He'd still have a camera on him, though.
I'd lol, but it's his not so hidden bigotry and incitement of his wanna be "followers" to violence that makes him a dangerous little coward.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: shame302 on August 08, 2009, 01:12:02 AM
Quote
the verbage used in that agreement was to cover their own ass
How so? I see it as insulting as well as an assault of sorts...
Quote
You're too kind. I had something else in mind, involving large hungry carnivores. He'd still have a camera on him, though.
Your opinion on this man doesn't change the general message here......Both sides have extremes sure, and yours is in office, but consider your rights are crumbling away......
Quote
Do you have any idea how offensive Beck is to me?
You, What you and the gentleman you voted for stand for are insulting and offensive to me....
Title: Oh My...
Post by: shame302 on August 08, 2009, 01:13:41 AM
Quote
I'd lol, but it's his not so hidden bigotry
Bigotry is not funny nor is the racial bias sitting in the big seat as we speak....
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Cougar5.0 on August 08, 2009, 01:15:57 AM
Hmmm, so who's playing "gotcha" and making this politcal now, Shame?
YOU posted a clip of an offensive broadcaster - now you're suggesting you know who we voted for and making this an "us" versus "them" thread?
Hmmm... hypocrite much?
Title: Oh My...
Post by: t3skidoo on August 08, 2009, 01:17:13 AM
IBTL!
If I may be serious for a moment. Really, do think questioning someone's patriotism is the right thing to do?
Now, once you get to know me, that's another matter....
Title: Oh My...
Post by: shame302 on August 08, 2009, 02:05:04 AM
Quote
YOU posted a clip of an offensive broadcaster
Just because you were offended or find him offensive does not make him offensive pal. Grow some skin. I rarely view him myself. Either or, It does not take from my original post....Lets keep political correctness out of this as its a huge downfall to OUR country overall....
Do YOU Cougar5.0 agree with the language in the posted "agreement?" I was sincerely wondering how in general people here felt....
I know who I voted for (or didn't) and i KNOW who you voted for because you yourself have told me in the past. What you fail to relate to me (despite me seeking an education from yourself) is WHY you voted for WHO you voted for ;0) and perhaps why I should have....
Quote
Really, do think questioning someone's patriotism is the right thing to do
YES.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Carl on August 08, 2009, 03:40:31 AM
Quote from: shame302;285789
So can one of my "guys" Jay Severin BUT, more extreme than who? Current "big guy", I don't think so. I have always though of myself as middle of the road. Until this last election i never voted, never really paid much attention. Wish i did and more often...
Bottom line though, What freaking BUSINESS what so ever has any business having such language in their user agreement? And if people cought wind, who in their right mind (other than the drones with their head down in denial) would aver accept...?
Holy shiznit man, it way so totally goes the other way with the current office and general media...good god...who do you think won the election?
Seriously, i DO NOT want another thread locked here...I was very stunned (not really surprised at all actually but dissapointed) when i heard this. I genuinely wanted well rounded opinions on this from a diverse croud. NOT from a "political" site where everyone has an agenda or is hard core left/right....To be either merits a "mental health check". I wanted opinions from average guys that are a little more like me and less like the yuppies........
For the record, I was bashing Fox news because I am not a fan of one sided media. I am neither right or left because I think both sides are working towards the same goal, and that's not a good thing.
I will leave it at that.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 08, 2009, 12:17:07 PM
Quote from: HAVI;285786
It was said that I don't take it seriously, I tried to prove otherwise, that's all.
I am sorry, I regret saying that and my mistake all the way around.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: HAVI on August 08, 2009, 12:24:52 PM
No need to be sorry, I understand completely where you were coming from.
If everything was going well in today's economy, we all would be discussing all the things we've been doing with our cars, car shows, new projects, etc.... Instead the majority is wound up and disgusted, and politics and people become the scapegoat, and it brings out the worst in many. And that's not just this site, I've seen it on several other forums as well. It's like a nationwide cabin-fever.....not healthy.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 08, 2009, 12:37:02 PM
on topic,
Beck's speaker (and much smarter than I with law) said its perfectly legale to include these statement.
however, in stewardship of being a good and fair resource for people to try and partite in some form of madness to stimulate car sales, the govt knew what they were doing by adding this and its wrong.
Seek I to try to educate myself by asking why people on opposite sides of the spectrum think like they do. My debates generally come equpped with substance , resources and fact as i think its the right thing to do so spouting off at the mouth doesnt happen. The other person 9/10 times will be equipped with nothing more than techniques of speech that flip the topic and totally avoids the answeres.
I swear, i have honestly asked people "XYZ" and it ends up being a generic answer or nothing answer/statement. I actually heard someone on Hanity say he liked how our leader is doing and i told the wife,, "honey, now thats another person i would love to talk with, try and learn what it is i am not seeing".
This cars program is charity,,, wait until tax time when you have to report your rebate ........see if its added back into your gross income or not.
Yes, Beck is strung up high but again, simply saying he is offensive is not the topic nor does it have anything to do with the topic, but more to do with if he is right or wrong and on the topic he speaks.
many people cant get past personality, i think thats where prior military people make out the most, we were blended with all walks of life and had to focus on the mission at hand. Being offensive had very little to do with the progress of the mission. There are a lot of people who are offensive but stating wild ideas of taking back your country , marching on DC, speaking out at town halls is only a small part being a american. Doing the right thing and staing on topic is critical in times like these.
CNN is a little softer than Fox and recently after what they did to Lou Dobbs (cnn) , i got a little frustrated that he was told to shut his topic down, that I decided that station might be partiting in dis-infomation techniques.
Atleast when you stare at someone on like O'Riley, he brings on board generally a dem, rep and middle to talk about a topic. Yes even on fox, there is a guy who demands he has people from all likes to debate or work through a topic.
This topic is worth looking into more closely and also worth looking into and comparing what other areas are being exploited like it.
It wont be long before we all are forced accept the "mark" so to speak,, as in ,, we have no choice other than to sign or click here to accept this or that.
I will stand up and rebel,, and become one of those so called paid or implanted town hall speakers about topics like this.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: xjeffs on August 08, 2009, 04:04:47 PM
How is Glenn Beck a bigot? I've never heard any bigotry out of his mouth. He was one of the only talk show hosts bashing Bush and the repubs when they were spending like drunken sailors acting like 90's democrats.
Anyway, how can you be offended at the fist post since it brought out a warning that everyone should heed? Who cares who points it out.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Cougar5.0 on August 08, 2009, 05:32:41 PM
I read this rant today which perfectly to a "T" describes why I will never debate people who get their news from corporate media ws:
Quote
The point is simple: there is the truth, and there are lies. There is information, and there is deliberate misinformation. There are facts, and there are distortions of reality.
And if you don’t know the difference between them, that’s a shame. But that doesn’t mean that the sane, intelligent, fact-seekers among us are responsible for your idiocy – its existence, its perpetration, its promotion, or its consequences.
If you are reading this on a computer, you have access to the truth. Use it. If you’re a computer dummy who doesn’t know how to search out real information, ask someone to assist you. It’s that simple – so stop being simple-minded and get with the program.
If you honestly believe that someone like Rush Limbaugh is a straight-shooter who wouldn’t lie to you, do some research into his background. Then ask yourself if a drug-addled bigot who makes his living riling up hate and discord might not have a financial agenda in roping-in gullible people like you and keeping them as part of his “audience share” – the numbers upon which his income is based.
The same goes for Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, and the rest of their ilk. These people aren’t stupid – they make their living by spewing complete and utter bullshiznit, knowing that people like you ARE too stupid to question it, no matter how incredibly ridiculous it is.
If you truly believe that Obama’s healthcare reform program includes talking your grandmother into being euthanized – or any of the other you’ve been hearing – you are an idiot, plain and simple. The facts about what is being proposed are out there, readily available. If you can’t be bothered to avail yourself of those facts, then shut up and allow those who can be bothered to inform themselves do the talking. We already have more than enough morons speaking out from a position of complete ignorance – you needn’t add to their numbers.
If you sincerely accept that someone like Orly Taitz, who can’t put a sentence together without making a public fool of herself, knows what she’s talking about, you are as much of a fool as she is – maybe more so.
If you believe that Sarah Palin’s ramblings – along with her hypocrisy, her questionable ethics, her complete inability to speak coherently or advisedly on every subject from how government operates to foreign affairs – qualify her as a leader of this nation or any other, you are just plain delusional.
The greatest threat to this country right now is the stupidity of people like you. In today’s technological world, there is no excuse for not being well-informed by reliable sources – not the gibberish you swallow from alleged “news organizations” that fill your head with nonsense because you are too lazy, or just too dumb, to allow a fact into your brainless head.
We all have our opinion as to whether the interests of our nation are best served by Democrats or Republicans, progressives or conservatives, far-leftists, far-rightists, centrists – or any combination of the above.
But on the topic of who can contribute the most to the serving the best interests of all citizens, there is one truth that is, on its face, self-evident: those of you who live in self-imposed ignorance, or hold onto your stupidity as though it was something to be proud of, are completely, unequivocally, and undeniably useless.
Abject Stupidity – we may never wipe it out in our lifetime. But if people like YOU can’t be bothered to get a brain, you can at least understand why the rest of us can’t be bothered to listen to a pointless word you say.
Are we elitists? You betcha! (Couldn’t resist translating that last comment into Palinese in an attempt to be understood by the intellectually impaired). We who seek out the real information behind proposed legislation and what it means are - you'll forgive me or not - bored to tears by those of you who can't conjure up the necessary energy to know what it is you're talking about BEFORE opening your big, fat mouths.
Debate the informed among us on the facts of an issue, and we’re all ears. We may not agree with you, but we are willing to engage in honest discussion.
But if all you are capable of is parroting the talking points spewed BY the ignorant FOR the ignorant, you will find that we who can actually THINK have better things to do than listen.
Got that? Good. It’s about time you finally got something.
It's a start.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: xjeffs on August 09, 2009, 08:48:13 AM
Quote from: Cougar5.0;285865
I read this rant today which perfectly to a "T" describes why I will never debate people who get their news from corporate media s:
Uuuuuhhhhhhhh......... yeah..... I'm done here.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 09, 2009, 09:56:39 AM
actually cougar5.0,
what you posted reminds me of someone giving a good old fashioned butt chewing.
sometimes people need woke up in various ways and to tell someone they are not informed, and are stupid for opening thier mouths on topics they dont know about is founded. Heck, ive been told im an idiot here in the past and yes i have been guilty of speaking on topics i should not have.
Ive been told the same thng myself in the past ,, guess what? I had to either STFU, or if i was interested in being involved then i needed to bring some founded substance to the discussion.
I have noticed something ,a word you have used a lot in the past which is "hypocrisy". The wife also keeps an eye out for any and all hypocrisy and once found, any and all information from that source suddently becomes BS. I cant get my head around it personally. We all at points in our life have to be hppocritical even when raiising our children. "do as i say,not as I do" ect ect.
Just the idea of my saying that the terms and conditons of the cars website is wrong, in another thread i say its perfectly legal and believe it is so. but.....read on........
during the times in which people wanted huge loans on houses they could not afford, the poor consumer out there was tricked because all the fine print was just too hard for us poor little stupid people to read. The truth is, if you wanted the loan, you had to agree to all that fine print no matter what even if it said that lack of payments would result in us putting you into a jail cell somewhere.
I dono people, it is what it is. My apparent paranoia sometimes pays off. I hope I am doing the right thing, doing the best thing possible and still trying to be a good father, friend and neighbor to people around me. I hate chaos and more hate the source of it all and stuff like this only makes me worry that we will be looking for a way out when today we could have made more progress than 10years from now.
For the record Cougar5.0, You have not said you agree or disagree to this cars terms and conditions, only that you pointed out the source was not reliable. No finger pointing here, i just wanted to point out that if you have an opinion on the topic, then share it or atleast stay on topic. The distractions do nothing but extend the amount of time the solution is found.
I disagree with the terms and conditions of the cars program as it is real and is public information to be viewed and accepted by anyone out there. I just have one more thing to ask of anyone out there because this isnt the first time ive been told that getting my information from the media is wrong.................
Where should I get my information from?
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Chuck W on August 09, 2009, 10:27:41 AM
The CARS program is shiznit, and it's going to come around and bite everyone in the ass.
(Don't mistake this for me being anywhere close to conservative in my political leanings...very far from it. A bad idea is a bad idea, no matter where it comes from)
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Thunder Chicken on August 09, 2009, 11:11:13 AM
This thread has already gotten far more political than we generally allow on this forum, but what the hell, I'll throw some gas on the fire before it gets really ugly and inevitably closed. Time to push this thing off a cliff:
I would be really surprised if the disclaimer on the CARS site wasn't a product of the Dept of Homeland Security, and is likely buried somewhere on every gov website. You know, that same Dept of Homeland Security, the one trampling all over civil rights and liberties of US citizens daily, that is a Bush legacy. I don't know what's more deplorable: The Republicans' very active and very blatant (and very sadly, apparently successful) attempts at dividing the country, or the fact that many people are falling for the propaganda, and in turn spreading it themselves with no regard whatsoever as to its truthfulness (the ignorant, factless statements being made all over the place about C4C, such as what happens to the car when it's turned in, and people claiming you have to pay taxes on the grants are but two examples out of about eleventy billion). It's almost like the Republicans are gunning for civil war and are using any stupid old thing they can come up with to try to start it, including something that is likely very much a product of their own policies (the cars.gov disclaimer), and other things that are definitely products of their own policies (the shiznitty economy, the auto bailout, which was a legacy of Bush, the even bigger banking bailout, which was another legacy of Bush, etc), not to mention things with no basis in truth whatsoever (Obama's birth) but they've grabbed it and run with it simply because it's another wedge to divide the nation. It took Bush 8 years to wreck the economy, yet Republicans are turning on the propaganda machine against Obama because he couldn't turn it around in less than 200 days? Bush gave away three quarters of a trillion dollars to the banks with no strings attached, yet the Republicans are gleefully watching Obama twist in the wind while trying to come up with ways to pay for it? They're resisting everything Obama tries to do, throwing up every roadblock they can, then very publicly chastising him for not doing it?
Republicans can cry about Obama all they want, but it is the Republicans that are driving your country into the shiznitter with their hypocrisy, underhanded tactics, propaganda, etc. Divide and conquer, that is their goal.
And don't mistake me for some left-leaning loon, either. I am no liberal. I believe in capital punishment, I believe in stricter sentences for criminals, I am against governments supporting private businesses and I own and use guns (hunting rifles, anyway). I drive a big, polluting V8 T-Bird with no catalytic converters. I resent every nickel that goes to the taxman, especially when I see those nickels being wasted on the aforementioned corporate bailouts, or even worse, supporting a lazy bum of a woman whose sole means of earning a living is to keep herself constantly knocked up so she can stay on welfare indefinitely.
I'm no right wing nut job either. Being Canadian, and having experienced firsthand that just about all of the propaganda spread by US conservatives about public health care are untrue and the few tidbits that have some truth to them are far outweighed by the benefits, I fully support it. I also believe that the state should not be legislating morals, and that everyone should be given the same rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (and this includes gay marriage, immigration, freedom from religious persecution, etc). I think that corporate lobbying should be outlawed, as it is nothing more than legalized bribery (just as gov't should not be running private industry, private industry should not be running the government). And while I do not think the government should be paying for private business, I do believe they should be regulating it. Not excessively regulated, of course, but regulated just enough to keep it honest, both to shareholders and to the public (the lack of which being what got the economy to the point it is today).
Now, let's see how long it is before the insults start flying and the thread is locked (which will show, once and for all, why we cannot allow political discussions on this forum).
Title: Oh My...
Post by: HAVI on August 09, 2009, 11:26:13 AM
Tell us how you really feel. :giggle:
EDIT: That's not aimed at anyone.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Blackout on August 09, 2009, 11:41:41 AM
LOL I think we should keep it going as long as possible Just to spite you Thunder Chicken!
On CforC though, It IS shiznit, and Chuck is right, Its going to bite us in the ass eventually. I cant see how buying a newly manufactured vehicle is more environmentally friendly than running a reasonably fuel efficient older car....The environmental toll that manufacturing a new vehicle takes HAS to be far worse than running an older vehicle......Even with fuel millage savings. I personally think that this had nothing to do with "going green" or whatever ( the main point supposedly of this program). This simply had to do with money.
Think about it. After GM and Chrysler went bankrupt after the feds shoved (how many) billions of dollars at them, the American public (in general) was PISSED. C for C is simply just another way for the feds to funnel more money at them, without us getting even more angry about it. Instead of taxing the hell out of us to pay for bailout loans, they've duped the general public into buying cars that they do not really need, and are cloaking it as an "environmentally friendly" solution for our "oil dependency". Thats funny as hell, considering that these vehicles still suck down gas. I think the point is here that we've been tricked into giving the automakers ANOTHER bailout, but this time we did it willingly.....OOPS... We've been DUPED.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 09, 2009, 11:59:26 AM
Quote from: Thunder Chicken;285923
I would be really surprised if the disclaimer on the CARS site wasn't a product of the Dept of Homeland Security, and is likely buried somewhere on every gov website. You know, that same Dept of Homeland Security, the one trampling all over civil rights and liberties of US citizens daily.
there, fixed it
that way its not that hairy and its more topic related.
I have not checked on the site myself "personally", too spooked at the moment to attempt it. I do have another laptop i dont mind being beheaded by the report so later this afternoon (i hope), I will do a screenshot of what it actually says just to see for myself.
Who has checked out this already,, verified its true?
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 09, 2009, 12:07:59 PM
Quote from: Chuck W;285919
The CARS program is shiznit, and it's going to come around and bite everyone in the ass.
(Don't mistake this for me being anywhere close to conservative in my political leanings...very far from it. A bad idea is a bad idea, no matter where it comes from)
you think? I dono, a car is a little more easier to afford than a house under the same conditions (ie- superfunding).
I would think a household income of 30k could likely afford a final balance of 20k spread out over a few years rather than 600k for a house spread across 30-50 years.
It has a banking appearance that its almost doable for many low income folks.
hope it works but........ I also hope it does not become a perm thing.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: xjeffs on August 09, 2009, 12:18:04 PM
I think the thing that has everyone so worked up about what Glenn Beck highlighted is that all we have witnessed under Obama is a take over of banking and car companies under the guise that they are saving the economy. Once they loaned them money, they started telling them how to do business. So when we see a warning that if we click in the wrong place the gov't will claim our personal property, everyone gets up in arms thinking that we are heading towards living in a gov't owned society.
I can't imagine us heading there, but it is a disturbingly, non-coincidental chain of events that should have us looking for "change" again.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Cougar5.0 on August 09, 2009, 12:24:14 PM
Quote from: Thunder Chicken;285923
This thread has already gotten far more political than we generally allow on this forum, but what the hell, I'll throw some gas on the fire before it gets really ugly and inevitably closed. Time to push this thing off a cliff:
I would be really surprised if the disclaimer on the CARS site wasn't a product of the Dept of Homeland Security, and is likely buried somewhere on every gov website. You know, that same Dept of Homeland Security, the one trampling all over civil rights and liberties of US citizens daily, that is a Bush legacy. I don't know what's more deplorable: The Republicans' very active and very blatant (and very sadly, apparently successful) attempts at dividing the country, or the fact that many people are falling for the propaganda, and in turn spreading it themselves with no regard whatsoever as to its truthfulness (the ignorant, factless statements being made all over the place about C4C, such as what happens to the car when it's turned in, and people claiming you have to pay taxes on the grants are but two examples out of about eleventy billion). It's almost like the Republicans are gunning for civil war and are using any stupid old thing they can come up with to try to start it, including something that is likely very much a product of their own policies (the cars.gov disclaimer), and other things that are definitely products of their own policies (the shiznitty economy, the auto bailout, which was a legacy of Bush, the even bigger banking bailout, which was another legacy of Bush, etc), not to mention things with no basis in truth whatsoever (Obama's birth) but they've grabbed it and run with it simply because it's another wedge to divide the nation. It took Bush 8 years to wreck the economy, yet Republicans are turning on the propaganda machine against Obama because he couldn't turn it around in less than 200 days? Bush gave away three quarters of a trillion dollars to the banks with no strings attached, yet the Republicans are gleefully watching Obama twist in the wind while trying to come up with ways to pay for it? They're resisting everything Obama tries to do, throwing up every roadblock they can, then very publicly chastising him for not doing it?
Republicans can cry about Obama all they want, but it is the Republicans that are driving your country into the shiznitter with their hypocrisy, underhanded tactics, propaganda, etc. Divide and conquer, that is their goal.
And don't mistake me for some left-leaning loon, either. I am no liberal. I believe in capital punishment, I believe in stricter sentences for criminals, I am against governments supporting private businesses and I own and use guns (hunting rifles, anyway). I drive a big, polluting V8 T-Bird with no catalytic converters. I resent every nickel that goes to the taxman, especially when I see those nickels being wasted on the aforementioned corporate bailouts, or even worse, supporting a lazy bum of a woman whose sole means of earning a living is to keep herself constantly knocked up so she can stay on welfare indefinitely.
I'm no right wing nut job either. Being Canadian, and having experienced firsthand that just about all of the propaganda spread by US conservatives about public health care are untrue and the few tidbits that have some truth to them are far outweighed by the benefits, I fully support it. I also believe that the state should not be legislating morals, and that everyone should be given the same rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (and this includes gay marriage, immigration, freedom from religious persecution, etc). I think that corporate lobbying should be outlawed, as it is nothing more than legalized bribery (just as gov't should not be running private industry, private industry should not be running the government). And while I do not think the government should be paying for private business, I do believe they should be regulating it. Not excessively regulated, of course, but regulated just enough to keep it honest, both to shareholders and to the public (the lack of which being what got the economy to the point it is today).
Now, let's see how long it is before the insults start flying and the thread is locked (which will show, once and for all, why we cannot allow political discussions on this forum).
I couldn't have said it any better myself - excellent post. And even though I do consider myself left-leaning, I also agree with that paragraph as I'm also a gun-owning libertarian who wants the governemt out of my life and wants them to learn to live with the tax revenue as it exists today (no more taxes.)
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 09, 2009, 12:36:29 PM
I suppose i will be the one to brave the site and verify if it is propoganda or not.
that should be enogh to satisfy those saying its a lie.
Afterall, thats what all this is about isnt it,,
"this must be a lie" "this must be BS" "this must be some form of radical bs" "this must be a hoax" "this must be something made up by a sicko" "this must be from someone's imagination"
so,,,,,,, out to the garage pc to capture a screenshot for everyone.
that way I can be a liar by going to a site i had nothing to do with creating and simply posting what is there.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Cougar5.0 on August 09, 2009, 01:06:00 PM
Quote from: Thunder Chicken;285923
I would be really surprised if the disclaimer on the CARS site wasn't a product of the Dept of Homeland Security, and is likely buried somewhere on every gov website. You know, that same Dept of Homeland Security, the one trampling all over civil rights and liberties of US citizens daily, that is a Bush legacy.
It just shows in spades what the rant I posted earlier was pointing out.
Bushco used the Constitution as toilet paper, yet those who would listen to their corporate w of choice have no idea that Bush was trampling all over the rights of Americans all along. Makes me laugh my ass off to see the utter utter utter impossibly ridiculous hypocrisy of those who are just now noticing what Bush did for many years - and blaming Obama for it!
Dear God, somebody shoot me now - these people are too stupid to live.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 09, 2009, 01:33:32 PM
when I first viewed the vid and heard him use the phrase "dealer", i had to ask myself how does this effect me?
I did a little digging and called a guy at our ford dealer here and he said that the registered dealer site is different than the public site.
so far beck on target ...........
Now the "dealer" site has been changed and the terms of services are a little different.
here is what beck got right / wrong.......although i am still not sure what it is he got "wrong" since he said all along it was with respect to when a "DEALER" gained access.
Interestingly enough though, the cars.gov site privacy statments are below..........
Our Commitment We respect your right to privacy and will protect it when you visit our website.
This Privacy Policy explains our online information practices only, including how we collect and use your personal information. It does not apply to third-party websites that you are able to reach from this website, nor does it cover practices of other areas within the Department of Transportation. We encourage you to read those privacy policies to learn how they collect and use your information.
What We Automatically Collect Online We collect information about your visit that does not identify you personally. We can tell the computer, browser, and web service you are using. We also know the date, time, and pages you visit. Collecting this information helps us design the site to suit your needs. In the event of a known security or virus threat, we may collect information on the web content you view.
Other Information We May Collect When you visit our website, we may request and collect the following categories of personal information from you:
Contact information IDs and passwords Why We Collect Information Our prinl purpose for collecting personal information online is to provide you with what you need and want, address security and virus concerns, and to ease the use of our website.
We will only use your information for the purposes you intended, to address security or virus threats, or for the purposes required under the law. See “Choices on How We Use the Information You Provide” to learn more.
We collect information to:
Respond to your complaints Reply to your “feedback comments” Manage your access to restricted areas of the website Fulfill requests for reports and other similar information Register you for a member account Sharing Your Information We may share personally identifiable information you provide to us online with representatives within the Department of Transportation’s Operating Administrations and related entities, other federal government agencies, or other named representatives as needed to speed your request or transaction. In a government-wide effort to combat security and virus threats, we may share some information we collect automatically, such as IP address, with other federal government agencies.
Also, the law may require us to share collected information with authorized law enforcement, homeland security, and national security activities. See the Privacy Act of 1974 below.
Choices on How We Use the Information You Provide Throughout our website, we will let you know whether the information we ask you to provide is voluntary or required. By providing personally identifiable information, you grant us consent to use this information, but only for the primary reason you are giving it. We will ask you to grant us consent before using your voluntarily provided information for any secondary purposes, other than those required under the law.
Information Practices for Children We do not intentionally collect information from children under the age of 13. If in the future we choose to collect personal information from children, we will comply with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).
Cookies or Other Tracking Devices A “cookie” is a small text file stored on your computer that makes it easy for you to move around a website without continually re-entering your name, password, preferences, for example.
We only use “session” cookies on our website. This means we store the cookie on your computer only during your visit to our website. After you turn off your computer or stop using the Internet, the cookie disappears with your personal information.
Securing Your Information Properly securing the information we collect online is a primary commitment. To help us do this, we take the following steps to:
Employ internal access controls to ensure the only people who see your information are those with a need to do so to perform their official duties Train relevant personnel on our privacy and security measures to know requirements for compliance Secure the areas where we hold hard copies of information we collect online Perform regular backups of the information we collect online to insure against loss Use technical controls to secure the information we collect online including but not limited to: Secure Socket Layer (SSL) Encryption Firewalls Password protections We periodically test our security procedures to ensure personnel and technical compliance We employ external access safeguards to identify and prevent unauthorized tries of outsiders to hack into, or cause harm to, the information in our systems Tampering with DOT’s website is against the law. Depending on the offense, it is punishable under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 and the National Information Infrastructure Protection Act.
Your Rights Under the Privacy Act of 1974 The Privacy Act of 1974 protects the personal information the federal government keeps on you in systems of records (SOR) (information an agency controls recovered by name or other personal identifier). The Privacy Act regulates how the government can disclose, share, provide access to, and keep the personal information that it collects. The Privacy Act does not cover all information collected online.
The Act’s major terms require agencies to:
Publish a Privacy Act Notice in the Federal Register explaining the existence, character, and uses of a new or revised SOR Keep information about you accurate, relevant, timely, and complete to assure fairness in dealing with you Allow you to, on request, access and review your information held in an SOR and request amendment of the information if you disagree with it. When the DOT collects information from you online that is subject to the Privacy Act (information kept in an SOR), we will provide a Privacy Act Statement specific to that collected information. This Privacy Act Statement tells you:
The authority for and the purpose and use of the information collected subject to the Privacy Act Whether providing the information is voluntary or mandatory The effects on you if you do not provide any or all requested information
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 09, 2009, 01:38:24 PM
Quote from: Cougar5.0;285953
It just shows in spades what the rant I posted earlier was pointing out.
Bushco used the Constitution as toilet paper, yet those who would listen to their corporate w of choice have no idea that Bush was trampling all over the rights of Americans all along. Makes me laugh my ass off to see the utter utter utter impossibly ridiculous hypocrisy of those who are just now noticing what Bush did for many years - and blaming Obama for it!
Dear God, somebody shoot me now - these people are too stupid to live.
there has been ample time to have issued out another record breaking executive order to overturn XYZ and it has not happend. Yes, he was not my guy either, really lost all my support in 2007 making it manditory all new births have blood drawn and this blood of new citizens become the property of the govt to do with as they see fit.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Blackout on August 09, 2009, 01:48:05 PM
Quote from: Cougar5.0;285953
It just shows in spades what the rant I posted earlier was pointing out.
Bushco used the Constitution as toilet paper, yet those who would listen to their corporate w of choice have no idea that Bush was trampling all over the rights of Americans all along. Makes me laugh my ass off to see the utter utter utter impossibly ridiculous hypocrisy of those who are just now noticing what Bush did for many years - and blaming Obama for it!
Dear God, somebody shoot me now - these people are too stupid to live.
LOL I find it funny that both you you are speaking like our current economic crisis is "Bush" or "Obama's" fault.
Newsflash!
No matter who the current puppet in office is, Its essentially the same administration that we've had for the last 40 years. That is what has screwed things up, not specific presidents. They are only the visible part of our administration, not the ones making the decisions. We've had failing government since the people in charge here embraced the federal reserve. Its been a downhill slide from there, and it will continue to do so until unrest spreads far enough to threaten the "real" people in charge and their power base.
Again, its not any specific president that has screwed things up, its not democrat or republican, Its the government as a whole.
I think that people have let things slide for too long because they are self centered and really un-interested in how their country actually works. If people would never have become complacent, the problems we have today would be a hell of a lot less messy.
The government should fear its people, not the other way around.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Cougar5.0 on August 09, 2009, 01:56:08 PM
I do agree that there's not a lot of difference between the parties these days and that if we don't do something soon, China & India will be eating our lunch. As it is they could destroy us in a nanosecond just by calling their loans. Those mouthpieces who sit there dividing this country even further are virtually assuring our demise. Please stop promoting them!! :(
We are in deep shiznit if we don't learn to get along and start moving in a different direction.
How does that expression go?
When the people fear their government, you have tyranny, when the government fears it's people, you have freedom.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: HAVI on August 09, 2009, 02:42:41 PM
It's like picking bread from the grocery store. No matter what you buy, it's still going to be stale in a matter of time. The best available out there, don't become govt. officials, they become critics of govt. officials. Somewhere along the line we failed to address that. And that was probably more than 40 years ago.
On a local level, we had two people run for Mayor. Neither of them are liked by anybody, but we had to choose one. To me, it just seems there's something wrong with that.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Thunder Chicken on August 09, 2009, 05:27:02 PM
Havi, you just described the last (and the next, and the next, sic ad infinetum) Canadian federal election. We had three losers to choose from, so we had to choose the least losiest loser. And, like in America, it's been like that for decades.
I've said it many times before: Obama did not become president on his strengths, he became president on Bush's flaws (which reflected on and dragged down the entire Republican party). People didn't really care who they were voting for, they just wanted something different than the status quo. A retarded chimp running for the Democrats could have won that election based on no other platform than "Hey, at least I'm not Bush". Obama knew this and based his entire campaign on the promise of change. It's far too early to tell whether he'll be successful in delivering, or whether that change will be for better or worse, no matter what any Republican says while gleefully pointing out that Obama hasn't changed the world in his first 200 days.
I only lightly touched down on what I believe is the root cause of the "lackluster government" problem (voter indifference aside): Lobby groups. Whether it be big business (IE Tobacco, Insurance, Pharma, Automobile manufacturing, big banks) or "public" interest (NAACP, AARP, PETA, religion, and of course the major political parties, etc - and I use the term "public" loosely, as each interest group has only its own agenda in mind) lobbying is the death of government, because lobbying either bribes (big business) or bullies (public interest) the government into doing their bidding. C4C is a prime example of this. So is the opposition to health reform. And so was the big bank bailout. Until it stops you can expect government to get worse, not better.
Funny, in China, where all of the growth is happening, you have government influencing business. In USA, where everything is at a standstill, you have business influencing government. Maybe I was wrong with my post above about how givernment should not run business...
Title: Oh My...
Post by: xjeffs on August 09, 2009, 07:47:24 PM
Quote from: Thunder Chicken;285987
... no matter what any Republican says while gleefully pointing out that Obama hasn't changed the world in his first 200 days.
I think Republicans are convinced that in 200 days, he has had a huge impact on the world.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Chuck W on August 09, 2009, 09:36:39 PM
Quote from: jcassity;285939
you think? I dono, a car is a little more easier to afford than a house under the same conditions (ie- superfunding).
I would think a household income of 30k could likely afford a final balance of 20k spread out over a few years rather than 600k for a house spread across 30-50 years.
It has a banking appearance that its almost doable for many low income folks.
hope it works but........ I also hope it does not become a perm thing.
Yes, I do think so. The only people it is "helping" are those folks who were thinking about buying a new car anyway and are looking for an easy way to unload that SUV they bought, which is usually a second or third car in some cases.
The people who can actually use a reliable, newer mode of transportation are those people who are struggling to make ends meet and have one older car. CARS or not, they can't afford a new car and all the additional expenses, such as the higher cost of insurance and plates, not to mention the taxes. The cars they COULD afford, and get many more years of use out of are the ones being traded in on this program, and summarily destroyed, all in the name of "progress". To quite a few folks, a 10yr old car, in good running order is a step up.
The media is all a flutter right now reporting that "dealerships are running out of cars", and trying to prop up what a good thing this program is for the economy, but it's all smoke and mirrors. When the money dries up, people are not going to be flocking to dealerships to buy cars, because the people who couldn't afford it in the first place, still won't be able to, and those who took advantage of the program won't be out to buy another car anytime soon. Car sales will drop again, and the complaining about how bad the economy is will begin anew.
The just went full retard when they decided to give more money to it. And we all know, you never go full retard.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: HAVI on August 09, 2009, 09:44:45 PM
Yep, Chuck knows where I'm coming from.
Regardless of party, IMO, it's still not a great idea. These are tough times, and I believe time is the only healer.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 10, 2009, 12:14:42 AM
well,, if it was ever a buyers market on stocks,, I predict this fall will be a repeat of last march. (say ,,oh, around mid november)
lets see if Im right.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Quietleaf on August 10, 2009, 12:52:43 AM
12 months from now dealerships will be going out of business. They've gotten greedy and have front-loaded all the demand. **Very** unwise move in my opinion. Right behind them the people who build the cars will be bleeding red ink...and I'll be laughing my head off at the folly.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Thunder Chicken on August 10, 2009, 07:52:52 AM
Very true. The automakers are low on stock because of the success of C4C. They'll ramp up production and demand will dry up as C4C either runs out of money or takers, then they'll be in the same boat...
Title: Oh My...
Post by: shame302 on August 10, 2009, 04:46:47 PM
Snopes reports this as false but it is only half false. The language was there, and has been changed. It apparently was in the tos for the dealers as stated before.
Bush sucked, Obama sucks just as bad (i believe much more as i do believe his policies/alignment are damaging) ANYONE extreme left or right are nuts. CFC in its entirety is a piss poor idea. Name one thing that the government runs so well that i would happily have them in direct control of my familys health care....restraint, reform and restructure are what needs to happen. The insane bailouts stimulous and other scams are never going to positivly effect the country. Here is the thing. There is so much information out there, so little time to sort through any of it and even less to process it. IMO, none of the media out there is un-bias so good luck to ANYONE that thinks they have all the answers. Some things make sense, Like respecting the BOR. Everything needs regulation to some degree but without crossing the line. That can be applied everywhere.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: 20thanniver-ls on August 10, 2009, 06:00:04 PM
Quote from: Chuck W;286006
Yes, I do think so. The only people it is "helping" are those folks who were thinking about buying a new car anyway and are looking for an easy way to unload that SUV they bought, which is usually a second or third car in some cases.
The people who can actually use a reliable, newer mode of transportation are those people who are struggling to make ends meet and have one older car. CARS or not, they can't afford a new car and all the additional expenses, such as the higher cost of insurance and plates, not to mention the taxes. The cars they COULD afford, and get many more years of use out of are the ones being traded in on this program, and summarily destroyed, all in the name of "progress". To quite a few folks, a 10yr old car, in good running order is a step up.
The media is all a flutter right now reporting that "dealerships are running out of cars", and trying to prop up what a good thing this program is for the economy, but it's all smoke and mirrors. When the money dries up, people are not going to be flocking to dealerships to buy cars, because the people who couldn't afford it in the first place, still won't be able to, and those who took advantage of the program won't be out to buy another car anytime soon. Car sales will drop again, and the complaining about how bad the economy is will begin anew.
The just went full retard when they decided to give more money to it. And we all know, you never go full retard.
Sounds like you hit it right on the nose. The majority of people who actually need a new car probably couldn't get one anyway, not only because they couldn't afford it, but they are lacking in credit most of the time because of their low income. Wealthier people see a good chance to trade in that 2nd or 3rd car for a brand new, not needed one.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: xjeffs on August 11, 2009, 02:43:26 PM
Quote from: Chuck W;286006
The just went full retard when they decided to give more money to it. And we all know, you never go full retard.
Great reference. Simple Chuck.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: jcassity on August 11, 2009, 09:54:37 PM
Quote from: shame302;286080
. Name one thing that the government runs so well .
they know how to blow shiznit up real well!!
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Carl on August 11, 2009, 11:12:50 PM
Quote from: Chuck W;286006
The just went full retard when they decided to give more money to it. And we all know, you never go full retard.
(http://i32.tinypic.com/2ryjadz.gif)
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Chuck W on August 12, 2009, 09:04:17 AM
Quote from: Carl;286308
(http://i32.tinypic.com/2ryjadz.gif)
I suppose you can take it that way if you want, but it wasn't intended as a specific statement, but don't turn any of my statements around to suit your Obama-bashing.
I don't discrimiate...all politicians suck. And if you think that this plan wouldn't have come into being with ANY other person in the WH, you are pretty naive. The system is broken, period.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Cougar5.0 on August 13, 2009, 05:30:02 PM
Quote from: Chuck W;286332
... And if you think that this plan wouldn't have come into being with ANY other person in the WH, you are pretty naive. The system is broken, period.
I wrote and received a response from Senator Gregg (R-NH) several years ago about this same plan as I was concerned about it back then. This has been kicking around for quite some time now.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Blackout on August 13, 2009, 07:13:13 PM
Quote from: Chuck W;286332
I suppose you can take it that way if you want, but it wasn't intended as a specific statement, but don't turn any of my statements around to suit your Obama-bashing.
I don't discrimiate...all politicians suck. And if you think that this plan wouldn't have come into being with ANY other person in the WH, you are pretty naive. The system is broken, period.
LOL I thought that picture was absolutely hilarious!
And you are right Chuck, Anybody else in the whitehouse, we would have had the same shiznit happen.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Carl on August 15, 2009, 01:08:31 AM
Quote from: Chuck W;286332
I suppose you can take it that way if you want, but it wasn't intended as a specific statement, but don't turn any of my statements around to suit your Obama-bashing.
I don't discrimiate...all politicians suck. And if you think that this plan wouldn't have come into being with ANY other person in the WH, you are pretty naive. The system is broken, period.
I actually don't mind Obama at all. I am a registered democrat and voted for him. I don't lean either way, and agree that the system is broke.
oh, by the way....
(http://i26.tinypic.com/2zqekgw.jpg)
Title: Oh My...
Post by: xjeffs on August 15, 2009, 09:10:26 AM
Quote from: Carl;286750
I actually don't mind Obama at all. I am a registered democrat and voted for him. I don't lean either way, and agree that the system is broke.
oh, by the way....
(http://i26.tinypic.com/2zqekgw.jpg)
Thanks for the laugh Carl.
Title: Oh My...
Post by: 86XR7project on August 15, 2009, 09:28:06 AM
What ever happened to no posting about politics?
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Thunder Chicken on August 15, 2009, 12:41:11 PM
Did you read this whole thread? I said I'd make an exception as long as it doesn't get ugly, and so far it hasn't gotten ugly.
And to put the "Any party would've done it" theory into perspective, I just read in the newspaper that the Canadian government is mulling our own C4C (in which case I will be truly pissed). The Canadian government happens to be a Conservative government (the Canadian equivalent to the Republicans).
Title: Oh My...
Post by: Carl on August 15, 2009, 04:59:08 PM
Quote from: Thunder Chicken;286796
Did you read this whole thread? I said I'd make an exception as long as it doesn't get ugly, and so far it hasn't gotten ugly.
And to put the "Any party would've done it" theory into perspective, I just read in the newspaper that the Canadian government is mulling our own C4C (in which case I will be truly pissed). The Canadian government happens to be a Conservative government (the Canadian equivalent to the Republicans).
Hey, as long as they buy Fords up there like they are down here right? :burnout:
Title: Oh My...
Post by: 86XR7project on August 15, 2009, 06:23:03 PM