cant believe everything you read but....
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/u/uraniumyellowcake.htm
Too political for me, but I will say I think it's 500 tons of pure unadulterated browncake, or maybe bullshiznit even. lol
[SIZE="5"]Delicious Radioactive Cake 111!!!111[/SIZE]
(http://www.geekologie.com/2008/01/25/sinistar-cake.jpg)
WTF!!!^^^!!! lol
Considering the big push, all of a sudden, for nuclear plants in Central Canada and New Brunswick, I wouldn't be surprised if it was completely true.
I just would have thought something like this would have been in the mainstream media than it has been if it is. i would have thought for sure it would raise some eyebrows.
How dare Canada start making nuclear power? Those bastages...
Does Canada even have enough people to feasibly justify building a nuclear power plant? :flip::evilgrin:
**** canada, where did all this plutonium come from?
Per Capita, we use more electricity than anyone. ;) It's not necessarily a good thing, but it is plenty of reason. Quebec is mostly Hydro Power, and parts of BC too. Manitoba just started their windfarm project, which is supposed to cost at least $1B (When they say $1B today, it'll cost two when it's finished.) over the next few years. The company I work for just got a contract to build 13 Windmill bases in Cape Breton. It's all about power, here. :D
Well since it's on the CNN site also
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/07/07/iraq.uranium/index.html
I'm guessing it true...
Does anbody feel any differant about Bush's motives for attacking Iraq and how true the threat was? A good point I noticed from the CNN site...
"Iraq has no nuclear power generating plants."
So just what was Saddam planning to do with 500 TONS of Uranium?
To my knowladge it's only good for two things.
"A national defense buttstuffyst says President Bush should be commended for keeping quiet about a discovery that could have blown his critics out of the water. "
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2117840/posts
Thats in part what i was thinking.
What I can’t understand is how this was kept so low key for so long, The CNN article is dated July 7, it is now 5 months later. There are comments that the media wanted to save face after their Bush Bashing…. But I dunno, seems like SOMEBODY would have gone off to exploit the hell out of this. and I’m JUST now reading it?
I find that part of this to be VERY questionable, that just doesn’t make sense to me.
Hmmm....
Snopes seems to indicate that the story is untrue:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/yellowcake.asp
There was apparently some uranium moved, but it was not some secret stockpile to be used for WMD's as the e-rumour states. It was from old, well documented sources.
DON'T DROP THAT SH*T!!!
Got it in one of them special CIA napkins.